Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “SARAH C PEARSON”
Pearson v. Pearsonpublic domain
BRIEF FOR APPELLANT: Brett Houston Oppenheimer, Louisville, Kentucky, Davis S. Strite, Louisville, Kentucky, Joseph Charles Klausing, Louisville, Kentucky. ORAL ARGUMENT FOR APPELLANT: Joseph Charles Klausing, Louisville, Kentucky. BRIEF FOR APPELLEE: Anna Stahr Rueff, Louisville, Kentucky, Gregory L. Smith, Louisville, Kentucky. COUNSEL FOR NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY: Carmen C. Sarge, Cincinnati,
Pearson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewpublic domain
OPINION FRIEDMAN, Judge. Priscilla Pearson (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR) affirming a referee’s decision which denied unemployment compensation benefits to Claimant pursuant to sections 1002(11) and 1201(b)(9) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).1 We reverse. From November 1994 until December
People v. Pearsonpublic domain
185 Mich. App. 773 (1990) 462 N.W.2d 839 PEOPLE v. PEARSON Docket No. 121788. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 15, 1990. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Gay Secor Hardy, Solicitor General, Richard Thompson, Prosecuting Attorney, Robert C. Williams, Chief, Appellate Division, and Sarah E. Hunter,
Pearson v. Rodriguezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Thomas F. Hogan, Senior United States District Judge Plaintiffs Michael Townsend Pearson (“Mr. Pearson”) and Eli Ivanova Pearson (“Ms. Pearson”) seek judicial review of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (“USCIS”) denial of Mr. Pearson’s Form 1-130, Petition for Alien Relative, which he filed on behalf of his nonciti-zen spouse, Ms. Pearson. Pending before the Court
Marietta Robinson v. Sarah Pezzatpublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. TATEL, Circuit Judge: We return once again to the familiar yet significant issue of the proper role of the district court at summary judgment. In this section 1983 action, plaintiff sought to hold police officers liable for unlawfully seizing her property in violation of the Fourth Amendment when the offic
Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. Earl Pearsonpublic domain
ACCEPTED 15-25-00037-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/14/2025 7:48 PM 15-25-00037-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Dennis Alan Eichhorn v. Sarah Eichhornpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-20-00382-CV Dennis Alan Eichhorn, Appellant v. Sarah Eichhorn, Appellee FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-FM-19-002120, THE HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Rutter v. Jones, Blechman, Woltz & Kelly, P.C.public domain
568 S.E.2d 693 (2002) 264 Va. 310 Charles RUTTER, Executor of the Estate of Mildred Duncan v. JONES, BLECHMAN, WOLTZ & KELLY, P.C., et al. Record No. 012612. Supreme Court of Virginia. September 13, 2002. *494 D. Hayden Fisher (Schaffer & Cabell, on briefs), for appellant. John Y. Pearson, J
Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. Earl Pearsonpublic domain
ACCEPTED 15-25-00037-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 3:02 PM No. 15-25-00037-CV
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0017 ══════════ Sarah Gregory and New Prime, Inc., Petitioners, v. Jaswinder Chohan, et al., Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for th
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vtcourts.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2024 VT 76
Sarah Doe v. Jerald Neveleffpublic domain
*385 EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Sarah Doe and several other anonymous female immigrants (“Plaintiffs”) were sexually assaulted while being transported from an immigration detention center. They brought a Bivens action against federal officials George Robertson (“Robertson”) and Jo
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0017 ══════════ Sarah Gregory and New Prime, Inc., Petitioners, v. Jaswinder Chohan, et al., Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for th
Beroth Oil Co. v. N.C. Dep't of Transp.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-74 Filed: 21 November 2017 Forsyth County, Nos. 10-CVS-6926; 11-CVS-2998, 7119, 7120, 8170-8174, 8338; 12- CVS-4851, 4853-4859, 4861-4870, 4873-4876, 4916, 5953-5961, 5963, 6321, 6322, 6652, 7721, 8189; 13-CVS-1645, 4506, 6794, 7129; 14-CVS-4803-4806, 4808, 4809, 5702, 5703, 6311; 15-CVS-0301, 0610, 2471-2532, 3208-3231, 4011-4016, 4655-4657, 5447, 5448, 6744, 7770-777
Pearson v. DMH 2 Limited Liability Co.public domain
MOORE, THOMAS M., J.S.C. INTRODUCTION: This matter comes to the court by way of motion and cross-motion for summary judgment. These motions require the court to determine whether a restrictive covenant prohibiting commercial use, recorded in the chain of title to 200 Bloomfield Avenue, Verona, New Jersey is enforceable against the present property owner. Having reviewed the submissions of the parties and hav
Alaska Stock, LLC v. Pearson Education, Inc.public domain
*1030ORDER TIMOTHY M. BURGESS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is an action by Plaintiff Alaska Stock, LLC (“Alaska Stock”) against Pearson Education, Inc. (“Pearson”) and several pseudonymously named parties for copyright infringement and fraud.1 Pearson has moved for summary judgment and Alas
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0017 ══════════ Sarah Gregory and New Prime, Inc., Petitioners, v. Jaswinder Chohan, et al., Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for th
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16-0252 Filed October 12, 2016 Upon the Petition of BRETT ALLAN MORRIS, Petitioner-Appellant, And Concerning SARAH OPOIEN, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Grundy County, Linda M. Fangman, Judge. A father appeals from the district court’s order denying
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WOLF, DISTRICT JUDGE In this case, plaintiff Dana-Farber Cancer Instituté, Inc. (“Dana-Farber”) seeks to correct inventorship of five patents. Defendants Ono Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (“Ono”), Tasuku Honjo (“Honjo”), and E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. and Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co. (collectively “BMS”) have moved to transfer this case to the District of Delaware, where .they are litigating earli
M.A. ex rel. Avila v. Norwoodpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER Joan H. Lefkow, United States District Judge Children identified as M.A., F.L, Y.R., and H.S., who have been receiving in-home shift nursing services under Illinois’s Medicaid program, have filed this putative civil rights class action against Felicia F. Nor-wood, Director of the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services (HFS) alleging violations of (1) the Due