Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) KEVIN SCHAAP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 17-cv-2837 (APM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) KEVIN SCHAAP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 18-cv-834 (APM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) KEVIN SCHAAP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 18-cv-834 (APM)

SANBORN, Circuit Judge. The defendant below was convicted of the charge that at Ft. Smith, Ark., on November 29, 1912, he— “did unlawfully attempt to introduce into the Indian country, to wit, into that’ part of the Indian country known as the Choctaw Nation of the Indian Territory, spirituous and intoxicating liquors, to wit, six gallons of alcohol, contrary to the" form of the statute,” etc.

760 F.Supp. 725 (1991) Kenneth SCHAAP and Marlene Schaap, Plaintiffs, v. EXECUTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC. and Motor Vacations Unlimited, Inc., Defendants. No. 89 C 7421. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. April 8, 1991. *726 Daniel R. Formeller, Jacqueline A. Criswell, James K. Borcia, Tressler, Soderstrom, Maloney &

ORDER BUA, District Judge. Plaintiffs Kenneth and Marlene Schaap filed this contract action against defendants Executive Industries, Inc. (“Executive”) and Motor Vacations Unlimited, Inc. (“Motor Vacations”), alleging that defendants sold them a motor home with substantial defects. In addition to their breach of contract claim, plaintiffs assert claims for breach of express and implied warranties. With the c

Marsh, J. (dissenting). The defendant, now 62 years of age, on March 4, 1952 entered a plea of guilty to violation of section 483-a of the Penal Law. The following day seeking the benefits of What was then considered a new flexible and humanitarian sentencing procedure, he requested and the court imposed a sentence of one-day-to-life. The record shows that he has been continuously incarcerated on the original charge since the dat

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-30337 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-03-00159-FVS ANDREW MILTON FLATTER, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Cour

BYBEE, Circuit Judge: Appellant Andrew Flatter was a postal service employee suspected of stealing mail. Before questioning him, officers conducted a pat-down search pursuant to Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), in order to ensure officer safety. The officers had no evidence that Flatter had a weapon; they conducted the search

PER CURIAM: Hamilton was convicted of gambling charges after arrests on July 22, 1957; September 16, 1959; November 10, 1959; November 6, 1961; and finally on May 21, 1965. He sought to enjoin the collection of a deficiency assessment based on an estimate of his income from July 1, 1961 through May 21, 1965, on the basis of three days receipts during May 1965, evidence of which had been seized during the execution of search

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SCALIA. SCALIA, Circuit Judge: This suit against the President of the United States and the heads of various departments and agencies responsible for the conduct of intelligence and counterintelligence activities challenges the legality of Executive Order No. 12333, entitled “United States Intelligence Activit

334 F.Supp. 1107 (1971) UNITED STATES ex rel. Daniel JACOBS, Petitioner, v. Hon. Robert FROEHLKE, Secretary of the Army, and John Doe, Commanding Officer, Fort Buckner, Okinawa, Respondents. No. 94-71. United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 16, 1971. *1108 Stephen L. Fine, Lubell, Lubell, Fine & Schaap,

Opinion Per Curiam. Opinion filed by WRIGHT, Chief Judge, concurring in the remand. PER CURIAM: This appeal presents the question whether the district court erred in dismissing a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) upon the basis of affidavits supplied by an official of the Central Intelligence

COFFIN, Chief Judge. This case raises questions concerning the duty of a district court to investigate and punish alleged prosecutorial misconduct at the insistence of a private party. Appellant was a defendant in a criminal case who obtained dismissal of the charges against him when, during the second day of trial, the assistant Unit

HART, J., (after stating the facts). The record shows that Slates had authority to sell drugs for the plaintiff and to collect past due accounts, either receiving payment therefor in money, or in the checks of customers drawn in favor of his principal. Slates indorsed the checks by writing his principal's name across the back thereof followed by the words, “per E. H. Slates.” The indorsement “per E. H. Slate

415 F.Supp. 459 (1976) UNITED STATES of America v. Delfin RAMOS COLON. Crim. No. 74-213. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 16, 1976. *460 Julio Morales Sanchez, U. S. Atty., D. Puerto Rico, Jose A. Quiles, Asst. U. S. Atty., D. Puerto Rico, San Juan, P. R., for plaintiff. Ludmilia Rivera, Juan Mari Bras a

429 F.2d 427 70-2 USTC P 15,957 Dennis HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Edward J. Fitzgerald, Jr.,District Director of Internal Revenue for the District ofManhattan, and Randolph W. Thrower, Commissioner of InternalRevenue of the United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. No. 755, Docket 34574. United States Court of Ap

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GAUVEY, United States Magistrate Judge. BACKGROUND United Oil Company, Inc. (“United Oil”), a distributor of hydraulic oils and industrial chemicals has brought an action in indemnity and contribution to recover the $820,098.89, which it paid to Mr. and Mrs. Jerry Tiede in settlement of their product liability claims against United Oil. Plaintiff

WALTER H. SANBORN, Circuit Judge. In September, 1922, Charles P. Morehead was adjudged a bankrupt. He then owed John Sehaap & Sons Drug Company $1,532.31, and this indebtedness was secured by a chattel mortgage to it on Morehead’s fixtures in his drug store. Pursuant to an order of the District Court, the trustee in bankruptcy sold at public auction, after due notice, the fixtures of the bankrupt for $1,500 to the John Sehaa

770 F.2d 202 248 U.S.App.D.C. 146 Javier SANCHEZ-ESPINOZA, et al., Appellants,v.Ronald Wilson REAGAN, President of the United States, et al. No. 83-1997. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued May 24, 1984.Decided Aug. 13, 1985. Appeal from the Unit