Cases

REVERSE in part; AFFIRM in part and Opinion Filed May 25, 2022 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00071-CV CENTRAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant V. RELIANCE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court Dal

Opinion RICHMAN, J. This is an appeal by the Governor, the Director of the Department of Personnel Administration (DPA), and dozens of state government entities (collectively, the Governor) from a judgment of the Alameda Superior Court issuing a writ of mandate as petitioned by Local 1000 of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) on behalf of approximately 95,000 members employed by the State of Cali

OPINION AND ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is an insurance coverage dispute between Central Flying Service, Inc., and *1040StarNet Insurance Company. Central Flying Service commenced this action seeking a declaration that it was entitled, to a defense, and indemnity for claims against it as a result of an airplane crash

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________ ) PREEMINENT PROTECTIVE ) SERVICES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-502 (RMC) ) SERVICE EMPLOYEES

*302Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court. In this case, we decide whether the First Amendment allows a public-sector union to require objecting nonmembers to pay a special fee for the purpose of financing the union’s political and ideological activities. I A Under California law, public

689 F.Supp.2d 891 (2010) FOREST SERVICE EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS and Daphne Sewing, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Defendant. Case No. 5:08-CV-00091-TBR. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Paducah Division. February 10, 2010. *893 Timothy M. Bechtold, Bechtold Law Firm, PLLC, Missoula, MT, for Pla

MEMORANDUM OPINION T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge This is the latest in the recent series of constitutional challenges to the National Security Agency’s (“NSA”) data gathering efforts.1 In this case, plaintiffs, nine organizations that communicate over the Internet, allege that the NSA’s interception, collection, review, and storing of plaintiffs’ Internet communic

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 98-3177, 98-3683, 98-3721, 99-1097, 99-1124, 99-1382 Beverly California Corp., f/k/a Beverly Enterprises, Petitioners/Cross-Respondents, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO, and Districts 1199P and 1199II, SEIU, AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent. On Petitions for Review and Cross-Applications for Enforceme

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) NATIONAL TREASURY ) EMPLOYEES UNION, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 25-0381 (AB

610 F.3d 782 (2010) David H. SCHEFFER, Mary C. Bergevin, Joseph L. Stephany, Laura J. Swartzenberg, on behalf of themselves and the class they seek to represent, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 828; The Civil Service Employees Association; AFSCME, Local 1000; AFL-CIO; and American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 07-3683-c

542 F.Supp.2d 617 (2008) SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF HOUSTON, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-06-3309. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 31, 2008. *624 Jonathan D. Weissglass, Katherine M. Pollock, Altshuler Berzon LLP, San Francisco, CA, Patrick M.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0063p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on │ be

2022 UT App 23 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS NICK KELLY, Appellant and Cross-appellee, v. TIMBER LAKES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Appellee and Cross-appellant, AND HOLLYVALE RENTAL HOLDINGS LLC, Appellee. Opinion No. 20191079-CA

2022 UT App 23 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS NICK KELLY, Appellant and Cross-appellee, v. TIMBER LAKES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Appellee and Cross-appellant, AND HOLLYVALE RENTAL HOLDINGS LLC, Appellee. Opinion No. 20191079-CA

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00746-CV Williamson Central Appraisal District, Appellant v.

HASELTON, P. J. Petitioner, Service Employees International Union Local 503 (SEIU), seeks judicial review of the final order of the Employment Relations Board (ERB) in an unfair labor practice case. Service Employees International Union, Local 503 v. State of Oregon, Judicial Department, 21 PECBR 98 (2005). ERB concluded that respondent Oregon Judicial Department (OJD) had not committed an unfair labor practice, ORS 2

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00746-CV Williamson Central Appraisal District, Appellant v. Research Park Property Trust, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 04-1106-C26, HONORABLE BILLY RAY STUBBLEFIELD, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORAND

647 F.3d 435 (2011) SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 32BJ, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Docket No. 10-3616-ag. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Submitted: April 26, 2011. Decided: August 1, 2011. *438 Andrew L. Strom, Office of the General Counsel, SEIU Loc

123 P.3d 300 (2005) 202 Or. App. 469 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 503, Oregon Public Employees Union, Respondent, v. STATE of Oregon, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, Home Care Commission and Department Of Human Services, Petitioners. UP-60-02; A122094. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted August 10, 2004.

781 F.Supp.2d 488 (2011) MILLER TRUCK LINES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CENTRAL REFRIGERATED SERVICE, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-939-C. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division. March 17, 2011. *490 Stockard R. Hickey, III, Gwin, Steinmetz & Baird, PLLC, Louisville, KY, for Plaintiff.