Cases

Partial Summary Judgment; National Parks Service Concessions Contract; Valuation of Concessioner’s Possesso-ry Interest; Leasehold Surrender Interest; Statutory Interpretation; Contract Interpretation; Implied-in-Fact Contract. OPINION HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT and STATUTORY FRAMEWORK Plaintiff, Seven Resorts, Inc. (Seven Resorts), asserts a claim for compensation a

143 F.Supp.2d 7 (2001) AMFAC RESORTS, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Defendants. National Park Hospitality Assn., Plaintiff, v. United States Department of the Interior, et al., Defendants. Hamilton Stores, Inc., Plaintiff, v. United States Department of the Interior, et al., Defendants. Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services, Inc., Plaintiff, v. United States Departm

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 31-MAR-2022 12:58 PM Dkt. 150 SO

USCA11 Case: 22-11504 Document: 35-1 Date Filed: 12/19/2023 Page: 1 of 30 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11504 ____________________ CHARLES HAROLD BEDGOOD, indi

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1815 ___________________________ Thomas Kohlbeck; Gay Hartfiel; Roger Leake; Rita Leake lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.; Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.

SUTTON, Circuit Judge. In this collective action, sales employees for Wyndham allege that the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to compensate them for overtime. After a bench trial, the district court found that the employees were similarly situated and had presented sufficient representative evidence to show that Wyndham violated the Act. The court concluded that the 156 employees worked an average of 52 hour

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT H. JACOBVITZ, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is the United States Trustee’s (“UST”) Amended Motion to Convert Chapter 11 Case to Chapter 7, or in' the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 808). (the “Motion”). The Debtor filed its Concurrence with and Response in Support of the Motion (Docket No. 318) (“Concurrence”). Creditors, Lawrence Castleman and Harminder

*269CERTIFIED QUESTIONS JUSTICE KITTREDGE: The Court agreed to answer the following certified questions from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina: 1. Does the South Carolina Real Estate Commission have exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether a violation of the South Carolina Vacation Time

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT H. JACOBVITZ, United States Bankruptcy Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion of Ramada Worldwide, Inc. Pursuant to Rule 3018(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure for Temporary Allowance of Claim for the Purpose of Voting to Accept or Reject the Plan (“Motion for Temporary Allowance of Claim”). See Docket No. 190. At the final hearing on the Motio

ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This lawsuit involves a claim under Colorado’s Premises Liability Act. The case arises from Plaintiffs injury when she was exiting the Colorado SuperChair chairlift at Breckenridge. Plaintiffs negligence claim was previously dismissed by Order of February 1,2016 (ECF No. 45).

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RODNEY W. SIPPEL, District Judge. This Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA) class action is before me on defendant Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. (Silver-leaf)’s motion to compel arbitrations and dismiss without prejudice, or alternatively to stay the action pending arbitration. Plaintiffs Robert and Lilly Iappini brought suit individually and on behalf of a purported clas

OPINION Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE' This is an employment 'discrimination suit filed by Michael Jackson (“Plaintiff’ or “Jackson”), against Landry’s Inc. (“Defendant” or “Landry’s”), formerly known as Landry’s Restaurants, Inc. Jackson alleges that he was discriminated against because of his disability and age in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE AS MODIFIED; AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND Andrew J. Guilford, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Norman Abramson and Car-reen E. Abramson sued Defendant Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. and four other corporate entities: Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation; Marriott Resorts, Tra

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRUCE KAYE AS TRUSTEE OF THE ) BRUCE KAYE REVOCABLE TRUST, ) DEBORAH KAYE AS TRUSTEE OF THE ) DEBORAH KAYE REVOCABLE TRUST, ) LAURIE KAYE KRUSS AND JASON ) LEIGH KAYE IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL ) CAPACITY AND AS TRUSTEES OF THE ) 2000 BRUCE KAYE DYNASTY TRUST, ) AND DENNIS A. RICHARD, )

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT Leslie E. Kobayashi, United States District Judge On December 24, 2015, Defendants Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. (“MORI”); Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation, doing business as Marriott Vacations Club (“MVC”); Marriott Resorts, Travel Company, Inc., doing business as MVC Exchange Company (“MVC Exchange”); Marriott

Chapter 11 Re Dkt No. 134 OPINION KEVIN GROSS, U.S.B.J. INTRODUCTION On September 9, 2014 (the “Petition Date”), Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc., and its affiliated Debtors, including Trump Taj Mahal Associates, LLC (the “Debtors”) filed for bankruptcy pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors have now filed Debtors’ Motion for Entry of a

OPINION & ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge. In this putative class and collective action, plaintiffs Thomas Bitner and Toshia Parker allege defendant Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. (“Wyndham”) maintained policies that required its sales representatives to work off the clock and in excess of 40 hours per week without proper minimum wage and overtime compensation in violation of the Fair Labor Sta

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION L. SCOTT COOGLER, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendants Wynd-ham Vacation Resorts, Inc. and Wyndham Vacation Ownership’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 78). Also pending is a motion to strike portions of the Plaintiffs’ undisputed fact section and certain exhibits admitted in support of the Plaintiffs’ response to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 129). F

PARIENTE, J. The underlying question in this case is whether the forum non conveniens doctrine was erroneously applied to force a United States citizen to litigate her negligence action in Mexico, when her lawsuit was filed against a corporation with its primary place of business in Florida and where the allegations of the complaint relate to an incident that took place in Mexico but center on conduct occurring in Florida.

Re: Dkt. No. 111 OPINION REGARDING MOTION OF TRUMP AC CASINO MARKS, LLC FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING THE AUTOMATIC STAY PURSUANT TO 11 US.C. § 362(d) TO ALLOW TERMINATION OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE DEBTORS KEVIN GROSS, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE The Court is deciding the motion of Trump AC Casino Marks, LLC (“Trump AC”) which seeks relief from the automatic stay pursuant to S