Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “SHEET METAL WORKERS' HEALTH & WELFARE FUND OF LOCAL NO. 19 v. MAXIMUM MECHANICAL”
441 F.Supp.2d 405 (2006) PENSION FUND, PLAN Robert J. ROBINSON, Jr., and Thomas J. Donohue, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SHEET METAL WORKERS' NATIONAL PENSION FUND, PLAN A, et al., Defendants. No. 3:05CV917 (MRK). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. July 27, 2006. *406
Massachusetts Laborers' Health and Welfare Fund v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusettspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1317 MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS' HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND; TRUSTEES OF THE MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS' HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, as Fiduciaries, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
10 F.3d 700 62 USLW 2301, 17 Employee Benefits Cas. 1826 Curtis GUIDRY, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant,v.SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL NO. 9,Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant and Cross-Appellee,Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund; Sheet MetalWorkers' Local Unions and Councils Pension Plan,Defendants and Cross-Appellees,Sheet Metal Workers' Local No. 9 Pensio
BRORBY, Circuit Judge. The issue in this case is whether Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) § 206(d)(1), 29 U.S.C. § 1056(d)(1) (1988), and its coordinate section in the Internal Revenue Code, I.R.C. § 401(a)(13)(A) (1986), prohibit garnishment of Mr. Guidry’s pension benefits after the benefits have been paid and received. I. BACKGROUND The relevant facts are undi
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: *71Table of Contents I. Introduction.............................................................75 A. Overview............................................................75 B. Plaintiffs’ C
Joint Apprenticeship & Training Committee of Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n, Local No. 9 v. Chapmanpublic domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW H. DALE COOK, Chief Judge, Sitting by Designation. This matter came on for nonjury trial on December 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14, 1989. Plaintiffs bring this action against the defendants for alleged breach of contract. In support of their claim, plaintiffs state that they are multi-employer apprenticeship training funds. As training funds, plaint
Allegheny Reprod. Health v. PA DHSpublic domain
[J-65-2022] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. ALLEGHENY REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH : No. 26 MAP 2021 CENTER, ALLENTOWN WOMEN'S : CENTER, DELAWARE COUNTY : Appeal from the Orders of the WOMEN'S CENTER, PHILADELPHIA : Commonwealth Court at No. 26 MD WOMEN'S CENTER, PLANNED : 2019 dated January 28, 2020, and PAREN
437 F.Supp.2d 851 (2006) Darin WINTERS, as personal Administrator of the ESTATE OF Donald WINTERS, Plaintiff v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and Keith Ferguson, Sheriff, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Benton County, Arkansas, Defendants. NO. 4:04-CV-00206 GTE. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division. June 2, 2006.
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Local 2, Office and Professional Employees Int'l Union, Afl-Ciopublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting in Part and Denying in Part Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss; and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court following the parties’ negotiat
315 F.Supp. 1202 (1970) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. LOCAL NO. 86, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL AND REINFORCING IRONWORKERS, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 8618. United States District Court, W. D. Washington, N. D. June 5, 1970. Supplemental Orders June 16, 1970. *1203
868 F.Supp. 1278 (1994) QUAKER STATE MINIT-LUBE, INC., Plaintiff, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 91-C-461J. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. March 21, 1994. *1279 *1280 *1281 Shane D. Smoot, Quaker
193 F.3d 613 (3rd Cir. 1999) IN RE: TMI LITIGATIONLORI DOLAN; JOSEPH GAUGHAN; RONALD WARD; ESTATE OF PEARL HICKERNELL; KENNETH PUTT; ESTATE OF ETHELDA HILT; PAULA OBERCASH; JOLENE PETERSON; ESTATE OF GARY VILLELLA; ESTATE OF LEO BEAM, APPELLANTS NO. 96-7623IN RE: TMI LITIGATIONALL PLAINTIFFS EXCEPT LORI DOLAN, JOSEPH GAUGHAN, RONALD WARD, ESTATE OF PEARL HICKERNELL, KENNETH PUTT, ESTATE OF ETHELDA HILT, PAULA OBERCASH, JOLENE PETERSON,
Good Fund, Ltd.-1972 v. Churchpublic domain
540 F.Supp. 519 (1982) The GOOD FUND, LTD.1972, a Texas limited partnership, and Good Financial Corporation, a Texas corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Marcus F. CHURCH and Marcus F. Church, Trustee; the Dow Chemical Company, a Delaware corporation; Rockwell International Corporation, a Delaware corporation; and the United States of America, Defendants. Perry S. McKAY, Charles C. McKay and the First National Bank of Denver, Personal Representative
Richard M. Ragsdale v. Bernard J. Turnock, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Healthpublic domain
841 F.2d 1358 56 USLW 2531 Richard M. RAGSDALE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Bernard J. TURNOCK, Director of the Illinois Department ofPublic Health, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 85-3242. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Oct. 22, 1986.Decided March 10, 1988.As Amended April 13, 1988.Rehear
NO. 04-15-00021-CV IN THE TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO APPELLANT VS. MICHAEL AND THERESA HAYES APPELLEES Appealed from the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas. Hon. David J. Rodriguez, Pres
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local 14 International Union of Operating Engineerspublic domain
415 F.Supp. 1155 (1976) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. LOCAL 14 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS et al., Defendants. No. 72 Civ. 2498 (CHT). United States District Court, S. D. New York. May 6, 1976. *1156 *1157 *1158 Paul
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
37 F.3d 945 63 USLW 2244, 63 USLW 2260, 18Employee Benefits Cas. 2161,2 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 495,2 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 640 KEYSTONE CHAPTER, ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC.,in representation of its members,v.Thomas P. FOLEY, in his official capacity as the Secretaryof Labor and Industry for the Commonwealth ofPennsylvania.Pennsylvania State Building and Cons
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local 638public domain
421 F.Supp. 603 (1975) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, and the City of New York, Plaintiffs, v. LOCAL 638 et al., Defendants. LOCAL 28, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Third-Party Defendant. LOCAL 28 JOINT APPRENTICESHIP COMMITTEE, Fourth-Party Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Fourth-Party Defendant. No. 71 Civ. 2877 (HFW).
727 F.2d 1247 234 U.S.App.D.C. 148 NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC., et al.v.Donald J. DEVINE, Director, United States Office ofPersonnel Management, Appellant. No. 83-1822. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Nov. 17, 1983.Decided Feb. 17, 1984.As Amended Feb. 17, 1984.