Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “SHELLEY v. MULLEN”
Shelley v. Patrickpublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM. Barry E. Shelly, proceeding in forma pauperis, appeals from an order of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denying his motions to proceed informa pauperis and dismissing his complaints for failure to prosecute under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). For the reasons that follow, we will summarily vacate and re*300<
OPINION BY Judge SIMPSON. This workers’ compensation matter filed in 1995 involves computation of an average weekly wage. We consider the term “wage” in the context of the injured worker’s dual role as employee and as president and sole owner of the Subchapter S corporate employer. John Mullen (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) tha
Donald Swearingen, et al. v. Estate of Vivian Swearingen, et al. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-05-132-CV DONALD SWEARINGIN, BILLY APPELLANTS J
Chilton's Administrator v. Shelleypublic domain
Reversing. James E. Chilton died testate on October 22, 1927, at the age of 88 years. His wife had died on March 25, 1925. He left the bulk of his estate to Shelby Roberts, a nephew of Mrs. Chilton. A contest of the will was instituted by Mr. Chilton's collateral heirs, and the trial resulted in a judgment in favor of the propounders which was affirmed on appeal to this court. Shelley v. Chilton, 236 Ky. 221, 32 S.W.2d 974
Overton v. Camden Countypublic domain
574 S.E.2d 150 (2002) G. Wayne OVERTON and Abode of Camden, Inc., Petitioners-Appellees, v. CAMDEN COUNTY, Camden County Board of Commissioners, and the Camden County Board of Adjustment, Respondents-Appellants. No. COA02-276. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 31, 2002. *151 Hornthal, Riley, Ellis & Maland, L.L.P.,
Overton v. Camden Countypublic domain
574 S.E.2d 157 (2002) G. Wayne OVERTON, Petitioner-Appellee, v. CAMDEN COUNTY and the Camden County Board of Adjustment, Respondents-Appellants. No. COA02-275. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 31, 2002. *158 Hornthal, Riley, Ellis & Maland, L.L.P., by Donald I. McRee, Jr., Elizabeth City, for petitioner-appellee.<
156 B.R. 761 (1993) In re SPRINGFIELD CONTRACTING CORP., Debtor. Kevin R. HUENNEKENS, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. James H. MARX, Sr. and James H. Marx, Jr., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 89-02057-RS, Adv. No. 92-3025. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. July 6, 1993. William H. Schwarzschild, III, Williams, Mullen, Christian & Dobbins,
Colwell v. Mentzer Investments, Inc.public domain
973 P.2d 631 (1998) Virginia D. COLWELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MENTZER INVESTMENTS, INC. f/k/a Alpine Motorsports, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. No. 96CA1014. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. IV. April 16, 1998. Rehearing Denied May 28, 1998. Certiorari Denied March 29, 1999. *635 Don, Hiller &
154 B.R. 214 (1993) In re SPRINGFIELD CONTRACTING CORP., Debtor. Kevin R. HUENNEKENS, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. James H. MARX, Sr., and James H. Marx, Jr., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 89-02057-RS, Adv. No. 92-3025. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. April 22, 1993. *215
Crestar Bank v. Triton/Richmond Associates Ltd. Partnership (In Re Triton/Richmond Associates Ltd. Partnership)public domain
103 B.R. 764 (1989) In re TRITON/RICHMOND ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Virginia limited partnership, Debtor. CRESTAR BANK, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. TRITON/RICHMOND ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Virginia limited partnership, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 89-01166-RS, Adv. No. 89-0332-RS. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. August 2, 1989.
290 F.Supp.2d 674 (2003) KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. TARGET STORES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 3:02CV633. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia. Richmond Division. November 7, 2003. *675 *676 R. Webb Moore, Esquire, Lisa S. Goodwin, Esquire, Hirschler
Platt v. Orickpublic domain
[Cite as Platt v. Orick, 2024-Ohio-1537.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT AUGLAIZE COUNTY BRADLEY PLATT, ET AL., CASE NO. 2-23-11 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEES, v. CASSIE O., OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Auglaize County Common Pleas
Angell v. Ber Care, Inc. (In Re Caremerica, Inc.)public domain
409 B.R. 737 (2009) In re CAREMERICA, INC., Debtor. James B. Angell, Trustee, Plaintiff v. Ber Care, Inc., f/k/a PPS, Inc., Adcar, Inc., Ann H. Day, Antonia P. Elliott f/k/a Antonia Ferrara, Joseph Alex Cannon Jr., Cher Cannon, Diversified Enterprise, Inc., d/b/a Cannon Construction, Cape Associates, LLC, Capital Resource Solutions, LLC, Carolina Long Term Care, LLC, d/b/a Carolina Care, LLC, City of Kinston, City of Wilson, Crescent State Ba
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BLACKWELL N. SHELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter comes on upon the filing of a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to join Dena K. Cantor as a defendant pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 719(a) or alternately to direct the Debtor to amend its complaint to add Cantor as a defendant. Upon the filing of an answer by Herman Cantor Corporation and upon the submission o
Williams v. City of Pittsburghpublic domain
32 F.Supp.2d 236 (1998) Ernest WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, et al., Defendants. Stephanie Wimbs and Dorothy Wimbs, Plaintiffs, v. SGT. J.A. Kearney, Deputy Sheriff of Allegheny County, et al., Nos. CIV. A. 96-560, CIV. A. 98-229. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. December 29, 1998. James W. Carroll, Jr., Tabakin, Ca
Morris v. Statepublic domain
YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice When the trial judges of this State don their robes and ascend the bench each morning, those with criminal dockets are often confronted with defendants who are rude, disruptive, noncompliant, belligerent, and in some cases, even murderously violent. In the face of this reality, Texas trial judges shoulder another heavy burden: the burden to tame the chaos before them, impose order, and uphold the dignity
Better Government Ass'n v. City Colleges of Chicagopublic domain
2024 IL App (1st) 221414 No. 1-22-1414 Opinion filed September 19, 2024 Fourth Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIR
Mouktabis v. Clackamas County Assessorpublic domain
763 Submitted February 3 on respondents’ motion to dismiss filed March 30, appel- lant’s response and motion for sanctions filed May 11, respondents’ reply filed June 1, and respondents’ motions for ORS 19.360 review filed May 8; motion to dismiss denied, motion for sanctions denied, motions for ORS 19.360 review denied, supplemental money judgments vacated and remanded, otherwise affirmed September 7, 2023
MEMORANDUM OPINION PAYNE, District Judge. This consolidated civil action arises out of the construction of the Chesterfield Crossing Shopping Center (the “Project”). The four buildings comprising the Project each have suffered significant structural damage since construction was completed. The owners of three of the four buildings each filed actions against the developer/owner seeking contractual indemnif