Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “SHELTON v. COMMITTEE FOR POLICE OFFICERS DEFENSE PAC”
Foote v. Ludlow School Committeepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1069 STEPHEN FOOTE, individually and as Guardian and next friend of B.F. and G.F., minors; MARISSA SILVESTRI, individually and as Guardian and next friend of B.F. and G.F., minors, Plaintiffs, Appellants, JONATHAN FELICIANO; SANDRA SALMERON, Plaintiffs, v. LUDLOW SCHOOL COMMITTEE; TODD GAZDA, forme
Americans for Prosperity Found v. Xavier Becerrapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY No. 16-55727 FOUNDATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-09448- v. R-FFM XAVIER BECERRA, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of California, Defendant-Appellant. AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY No. 16-55786 FOUNDATION,
ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM
NUMBER 13-16-00332-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MARK A. CANTU III, Appellant, v. COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee. On appeal from the 398th District Court of Hid
OPINION BY Judge ANNE E. ... COVEY. Pennsylvanians for Union Reform (PFUR) petitions for review of -the Pennsylvania Office of-Open Record’s (OOR) June 12, 2014 Final Determination denying PFUR’s appeal from the Pennsylvania Office of Administration’s (OA) denial - of PFUR’s Right-to-Know Law (RTKL) 1 <
Arlo Tatum, Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defensepublic domain
444 F.2d 947 144 U.S.App.D.C. 72 Arlo TATUM, Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors,et al., Appellants,v.Melvin R. LAIRD, Secretary of Defense, et al. No. 24203. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Jan. 20, 1971.Decided April 27, 1971. Mr
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 17–1592 Filed June 29, 2018 GREGORY BALDWIN, Appellee, vs. CITY OF ESTHERVILLE, IOWA; MATT REINEKE, Individually and in his Official Capacity as an officer of the Estherville Police Department; and MATT HELLICKSON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as an officer of the Estherville Police Department, Appellant. Certified questions of law from the Unite
421 F.2d 1090 137 U.S.App.D.C. 155 JEANNETTE RANKIN BRIGADE et al., Appellants,v.CHIEF OF THE CAPITOL POLICE et al., Appellees. No. 21566. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Dec. 9, 1968.Decided June 20, 1969. Miss Harriet Van Tassel, Newark, N.J.,
WALD, Circuit Judge: Appellants in these consolidated appeals brought actions in district court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from certain of the provisions of section 321 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, 2 U.S.C. § 441b, 1 (“FECA” or the “Act”). Their complaints alleged that these pro
Union Pac. R. Co. v. Ruefpublic domain
McPHERSON, District Judge. This is a bill in equity brought against the defendants asking that they be enjoined from in any manner interfering with complainant’s property, its business, or with its employés. The complainant is a corporation of the state of Utah. The defendants are all citizens of the state of Nebraska, excepting three, one of whom is a citizen of Wyoming, one of Illinois, and one of the state of Ohio. But, these
Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of Columbiapublic domain
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge: This appeal tenders for resolution questions as to the examinatorial entitlements of the criminally accused at federal preliminary hearings. Appellants, Lawrence D. Coleman, Jorge D. Dancis and Ronald Shepard, were arrested and charged 1 with the commission of unrelated crimes within the District of Columbi
737 F.2d 1 237 U.S.App.D.C. 219 Julius HOBSON, et al.v.Jerry WILSON, Thomas J. Herlihy, Jack Acree, ChristopherScrapper, Edward Jagen, John Mahaney & GeorgeSuter, Appellants,John B. Layton, et al.Julius HOBSON, et al.v.Jerry WILSON, et al.Charles D. Brennan, Courtland J. Jones, Gerald T. Grimaldi,George C. Moore & Gerould W. Pangburn, Appellants.Julius HOBSON, et al.
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA UMIALIK INSURANCE CO., ) ) Supreme Court
Mannina v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) VICTORIA MANNINA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-931 (KBJ/RMM) ) DISTRICT O
Keith v. Health-Pro Home Care Servs., Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-72 No. 33A21 Filed 17 June 2022 THOMAS KEITH and TERESA KEITH v. HEALTH-PRO HOME CARE SERVICES, INC. Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 275 N.C. App. 43 (2020), reversing a judgment entered on 11 April 2018 by Judge Marvin K. Blount in Super
Keith v. Health-Pro Home Care Servs., Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-72 No. 33A21 Filed 17 June 2022 THOMAS KEITH and TERESA KEITH v. HEALTH-PRO HOME CARE SERVICES, INC. Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 275 N.C. App. 43 (2020), reversing a judgment entered on 11 April 2018 by Judge Marvin K. Blount in Super
State of Alaska v. The Estate of Harry Powellpublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA STATE OF ALASKA, ) ) Supreme Cour
State v. Abella.public domain
*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 17-DEC-2019 08:22 AM IN THE SUPREME
Faulconbridge v. Statepublic domain
142 P.3d 777 (2006) 2006 MT 198 333 Mont. 186 Alan Ray FAULCONBRIDGE, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Elisha Kay Faulconbridge and Bernice Kay Faulconbridge, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE of Montana, Defendant and Respondent and Cross-Appellant. No. 04-592. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on
Shauntae Anderson v. William Crouchpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1927 Doc: 119 Filed: 04/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 147 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1721 MAXWELL KADEL; JASON FLECK; CONNOR THONEN-FLECK; JULIA MCKEOWN; MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR.; C.B., by his next friends and parents; SAM