⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “SILVER STATE STEEL GROUP, INC”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023-05-02 · Published · cited 16× · 66 F.4th 1110
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1613 ___________________________ Larry Johnson Plaintiff - Appellant v. Schulte Hospitality Group, Inc. Defendant -
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-11-22 · Published · cited 2× · 258 N.E.3d 614; 2024 Ohio 5503
[Cite as Gentry v. Silver Linings Agency, 2024-Ohio-5503.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO ANDINA GENTRY, : APPEAL NO. C-240036 TRIAL NO. A-2200060 Plaintiff-Appellant, : vs. :
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-10-24 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 7135
Ortiz v Silver Invs. (2018 NY Slip Op 07135) Ortiz v Silver Invs. 2018 NY Slip Op 07135 Decided on October 24, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judi
United States Court of International Trade · 2002-04-05 · Published · cited 0× · 201 F. Supp. 2d 1287; 26 Ct. Int'l Trade 403; 26 C.I.T. 403; 24 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1511; 2002 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 37
201 F.Supp.2d 1287 (2002) THE COMMITTEE OF DOMESTIC STEEL WIRE ROPE AND SPECIALTY CABLE MANUFACTURERS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Cooper Tools, Inc., Dragon Trading Inc., and the Indusco Group, and Usha Martin Industries, Ltd and Usha Martin Americas, Inc., and Nantong Wire Rope Co. and Nantong Zhongde Steel Wire Rope Defendant-Intervenors. Slip. Op. 02-36, Court No. 01-00209.
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-05-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE COLUMBIA PIPELINE GROUP, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED MERGER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2018-0484-JTL OPINION RESOLVING POST-TRIAL ISSUES Date Submitted: January 19, 2024 Date Decided: May 15, 2024 Ned Weinberger, Brendan W. Sullivan, LABATON KELLER SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Gregory V. Varallo, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LL
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2008-01-15 · Published · cited 23× · 942 A.2d 596; 2008 Del. LEXIS 20; 2008 WL 187511
942 A.2d 596 (2008) Carlo MATULICH, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. AEGIS COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., World Focus, Essar Investments Limited, Anshuman Ruia, Pramod Saxena, Rajiv Agarwal, Kannan Ramasamy, Madhu Vuppuluri, Richard Ferry, John-Michael Lind, Rashesh Shah, and Kamalnayan Agarwal, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 279, 2007. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: Decemb
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2016-02-19 · Published · cited 5× · 180 F. Supp. 3d 381; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20353; 2016 WL 2641793
ORDER Max 0. Cogburn, Jr., United States District Judge THIS MATTER is before the court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (# 21). After being fully briefed, the court heard oral arguments on the motion on January 25, 2016. Having considered the motion, briefs, arguments of counsel, and evidentiary record, the court enters the following findings, conclusions, and Order. FINDINGS AND C
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-03-10 · Published · cited 20× · 168 F. Supp. 3d 575; 2016 WL 1047392; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31080
OPINION & ORDER Ronnie Abrams, United States District Judge Plaintiff Gordian Group, LLC brings this diversity action against Defendant Sy-ringa Exploration, Inc. alleging breach of an investment banking services contract. Syringa moved to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of personal jurisdiction and pursuant to Rule 12(b)(7) for failure to join an ind
District Court, D. Nevada · 2015-01-09 · Published · cited 1× · 85 F. Supp. 3d 1200; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3261; 2015 WL 133796
ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. This case arises from the United States Citizenship & Immigration Service’s (“US-CIS”) decision to revoke its initial approval of various 1-526 petitions. Pending before the Court is the USCIS’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 30). For the reasons contained herein, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-07-17 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 07/16/2024 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:10:52 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-01-17 · Published · cited 20× · 233 F. Supp. 3d 4; 2017 WL 168866; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5798
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge In April of 2016, pro se plaintiff Adam Apton—the lessee of a 2013 Volkswagen Passat—received a “safety recall” letter from Defendant Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (“Volkswagen”), notifying him of an airbag defect in his vehicle. (Compl., Attach, to Notice of Removal, ECF N
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2007-06-20 · Published · cited 1× · 497 F. Supp. 2d 1347; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46693; 2007 WL 1790706
497 F.Supp.2d 1347 (2007) Melissa McGUIRE, Plaintiff, v. THE RYLAND GROUP, INC., Defendant. No. 605CV1421ORL22KRS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. June 20, 2007. *1348 Carlos Raul Diez-Arguelles, Attorneys Trial Group, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff. Charles J. Cacciabeve, Christopher Mark Paolini
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009-12-17 · Published · cited 5× · 421 B.R. 891; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 4031; 2009 WL 4906589
421 B.R. 891 (2009) In re RAYMOND PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC., et al., Debtors. Raymond Professional Group, Inc., Plaintiff, Raymond Management Services, Inc. n/k/a Raymond Professional Group-Design/Build, Inc., Co-Plaintiff to Count VI v. William A. Pope Company, Defendant. William A. Pope Company, Counter-Plaintiff as to Count VI v. Raymond Professional Group, Inc. and Raymond Management Services, Inc., n/k/a Raymond Profession
Silver v. Brownpublic domain
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2009-11-30 · Published · cited 1× · 678 F. Supp. 2d 1187; 2009 WL 5220297
678 F.Supp.2d 1187 (2009) David SILVER, Plaintiff, v. Matthew A. BROWN, Growth Technologies International, Inc. and Jack McMullen, Defendants. No. Civ. 09-0510 JB/ACT. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. November 30, 2009. *1193 David Silver, Espanola, NM, Plaintiff Pro Se. Kristofer C. Knutson, Christopher M. Gri
District Court, E.D. New York · 2010-04-27 · Published · cited 30× · 708 F. Supp. 2d 277; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41218; 2010 WL 1688359
708 F.Supp.2d 277 (2010) Dr. Gerald FINKEL, as Chairman of the Joint Industry Board of the Electrical Industry, Plaintiff, v. The TRIPLE A GROUP, INC. and Michael Volpe, Defendants. No. 07-CV-2653 (RRM)(SMG). United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 27, 2010. *279 David Ronald Hock, Cohen, Weiss & Simon, LLP, New Yo
District Court, S.D. New York · 2009-08-28 · Published · cited 8× · 651 F. Supp. 2d 72; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77149; 2009 WL 2709298
651 F.Supp.2d 72 (2009) GAYLE MARTZ, INC., Plaintiff, v. SHERPA PET GROUP, LLC, Tim R. Ford and Kevin T. Sheridan, Defendants. Sherpa Pet Group, LLC, Tim R. Ford and Kevin T. Sheridan, Counterclaim/Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Gayle Martz, Inc., Gayle Martz, Individually and in her capacity as Officer and Director of Gayle Martz, Inc. and Sam J. Nole, Individually and in his capacity as Officer and Director of Gayle Martz, Inc., Counter
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009-03-10 · Published · cited 10× · 256 F.R.D. 284; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19812; 2009 WL 637676
RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND APPOINTMENT OF CLASS COUNSEL (DOC. NO. 121) JANET C. HALL, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................287 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND................................................288 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW............................
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2011-09-29 · Published · cited 1× · 822 F. Supp. 2d 1201; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130841; 2011 WL 5320620
822 F.Supp.2d 1201 (2011) GULF STATES REORGANIZATION GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. NUCOR CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:02-CV-2600-RDP. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Eastern Division. September 29, 2011. *1204 Philip Clark Jones, Philip Clark Jones, Greenburg, Spence & Taylor, PC, Rockville, MD, Ralph
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013-07-25 · Published · cited 28× · 433 Md. 170; 70 A.3d 347; 2013 WL 3828799; 2013 Md. LEXIS 466
ADKINS, J., dissenting. On August 21, 2008, Michael Eaton entered JMGM’s bar where, over a six-hour period, he was served at least twenty-*200one alcoholic drinks, to the point of becoming violent and aggressive. Eaton then left the bar, got in his car, drove down the road at eighty-eight to ninety-eight miles per hour, collided with another car, and killed an innocent t
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2014-12-02 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued December 2, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00016-CV ——————————— WUXI TAIHU TRACTOR COMPANY, LTD., Appellant V. THE YORK GROUP, INC., App