Cases

PER CURIAM. In these consolidated cases, Mosazghi Simon, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture,* and an order denying his motion to reopen the Board’s decision. To obtain reversal

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00194-CR EX PARTE Gerald Simon GONZALES Original Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 9, 2025 No. 04-25-00194-CR EX PARTE Gerald Simon GONZALES Original Proceeding 1 ORDER Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios,

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-3540 ___________ Simon Kiloobe Lubale, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an v. * Order of the Board of

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. In October 2003, an Immigration Judge (IJ) denied Simon Kiloobe Lubale’s application for asylum and related relief, but permitted him to depart voluntarily. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissed Lubale’s appeal, and granted a 60 day period of voluntary departure until July 15, 2005. On August 12, 2005, Lubale moved to reopen his proceedings. Th

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Appellant, Juan “John” Simon Gonzales (Gonzales), was convicted, on his guilty plea pursuant to a plea agreement, of one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2). The district court sentenced Gonzales to a term of imprisonment of 120 months, a 3 y

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ July 20, 2006 decision. Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). A

MEMORANDUM *** Maria Segura Sequera petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order granting her voluntary departure. 1. The IJ did not abuse his discretion by failing to continue Petitioner’s removal *549hearing. The record does not reflect that P

*571MEMORANDUM ** Adriana Hernandez Duran, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial evidence, Ra

MEMORANDUM ** Simon Karapetyan, a native of Russia and citizen of Armenia, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence,

MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The tempor

MEMORANDUM ** Maria Eugenia Aviles and Erasmo Vicario Najera, natives and citizens of Mexico and husband and wife, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, summarily affirming the immigration judge’s denial of their application for cancellation of removal. We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to estab

MEMORANDUM ** Hanny Youssef Ghaly, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming and adopting an Immigration Judge’s (“U”) order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the BIA’s decision for substa

MEMORANDUM** Refugio Castaneda Marquina, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Bhasin v. Gonzales, 428 F.3d 977, 983 (9th Cir.2005), we deny the petition for review. The BIA did no

MEMORANDUM **** Carlos Cabuyales Lopez and Fanny Ruth Arteaga, a married couple, and their two minor children, Juan David Cabuyales Arteaga and Katherine Cabuyales Arteaga, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum and withholding of removal.1 The IJ denied the petitioners’

MEMORANDUM ** Ricardo Lucero-Ceron, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming without opinion an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence,

MEMORANDUM ** Hany Felobous petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the decision of the Immigration Judge finding Felobous subject to an order of removal from the United States and denying Felobous’s application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we remand for a further hearing. Because th

MEMORANDUM ** Juana Lorena Tzoc-Alfaro, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals that summarily affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, see Na

MEMORANDUM *** Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that petitioner failed to present sufficient persuasive and credible evidence that her departure from Somalia was a result of persecution on account of a protected ground. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1244-45 (9th Cir.2000). Substantial evidence supports also the BIA’s finding that petitioner did not establish that she was entitled

MEMORANDUM ** Juan Jose Martinez-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, Abebe v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d 1037, 1040-41 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), and deny the petition for review. Martinez-Gonz