Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “SMITH & CHAMBERS SALVAGE”
808 F.Supp. 1492 (1992) SMITH & CHAMBERS SALVAGE, a Washington General Partnership, Plaintiff, v. INSURANCE MANAGEMENT CORP.; Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.; and Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, Defendants. No. CY-91-3055-AAM. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. May 11, 1992. *1493
Commonwealth v. Chamberspublic domain
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 17-P-441 Appeals Court COMMONWEALTH
River Salvage, Inc. v. Kingpublic domain
JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge. In August 1992, River Salvage, Inc., d/b/a Treasures of the Steamship Arabia (River Salvage) filed suit against Ja Chi King (Bang), U-Mart International, Inc. (U-Mart), Cheung’s Restaurant, Inc., River Market Venture I, L.P., and the Planned Industrial Expansion Authority of Kansas City, Missouri to stop the infiltration of water into the Steamboat Arabia Museum (Museum) from the grocery and restauran
Pettit v. Smithpublic domain
ORDER DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Plaintiff Ron Zachary Pettit filed a motion for spoliation sanctions in January 2014. Doc. 163. The Court held a hearing on March 26, 2014, at which it heard oral argument on Plaintiffs motion. Doc. 195. Based on the argument, the Court allowed Plaintiff to conduct additional discovery and file a renewed motion for sanctions. Id. Plaintiff has now filed
Bos v. Smithpublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice Garza This appeal involves a suit filed by ap-pellee Craig S. Smith, individually and as next friend of. his minor children M.W.F.S., C.S.S., J.E.S., and V.A.S., against appellants Larry and Mary Bos. Following a bench trial, the trial court rendered judgment awarding over $10 million plus interest to Smith in his individual and representative capacities. On app
Smith v. Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.public domain
*1246 ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated February 28, 2012 (doc. 309). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Co
Smith v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Ass'npublic domain
825 F.Supp.2d 859 (2011) E. Boyd SMITH, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. C-11-260. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division. November 21, 2011. *861 David Zuehl Conoly, Attorney at Law, Corpus Christi, TX, for Plaintiff. William Lance Lewis, Baron
Smith v. Arthur Andersen LLPpublic domain
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge: Gerald K. Smith, in his capacity as Plan Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Boston Chicken, Inc. and various related entities (the Trustee) filed an action alleging a variety of claims. Later, the Trustee filed motions seeking district court approval of settlements reached with certain of the *995defendants and requesting bar orders
Smith v. Magraspublic domain
124 F.3d 457 Alan D. SMITH; Kathleen Mackay; Adam G. Christian;Barbara Weatherly; Appellees,De Vos & Co.; Virgin Islands Bar Association,v.Clement MAGRAS, Individually and in His Capacity As Comm. OfDept. of Licensing and Consumer AffairsClement Magras &*Government of the VirginIslands, Appellants. No. 96-7660.
State of Iowa v. Andrew James Lopezpublic domain
WATERMAN, Justice. Most criminal cases are resolved through guilty pleas resulting from plea bargains negotiated by defense counsel and the prosecution. 1 Our precedent makes clear that prosecutors are required to scrupulously honor the letter and spirit of plea agreements to maintain the integrity of the plea-bargainin
213 F.Supp.2d 331 (2002) NATIONAL WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, INC., Defendant. No. 93 CIV. 7244(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 29, 2002. *332 *333 Benjamin Zelermyer, Serchuk & Zelermyer, White Plains, NY, Andre
United States v. Smithpublic domain
686 F.Supp. 847 (1988) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Bernard SMITH, Defendant. No. 87-CR-374. United States District Court, D. Colorado. March 25, 1988. *848 *849 Catharine M. Goodwin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for plaintiff. Charles Szekely, Asst. Federal Public Defend
In re the Personal Restraint of Tortorellipublic domain
Chambers, J. John Tortorelli was found guilty of theft, trafficking in stolen property, and criminal profiteering arising from his business of salvaging stray logs and submerged trees from Lake Washington. Tortorelli made several challenges to his convictions in his direct appeal, *86which were rejected by the Court of Appeals. In this personal restraint petition he raises
PBI Bank, Inc. v. Signature Point Condominiums LLCpublic domain
OPINION JONES, JUDGE: These appeals arise out of a judgment entered by the Jefferson Circuit Court following a jury trial. In accordance with the jury’s verdict, the trial court awarded the Appellees, Signature Point Condominiums LLC, Signature Point Apartments LLC, and Signature Point KTC LLC, (collectively “Signature Point”), $1,515,000 in compensatory damages plus $5,500,000 in punitive damages for
Motion for Rehearing Granted in Part and Denied in Part; Reversed and Remanded; Opinions of October 5, 2004 Withdrawn and Opinion on Rehearing filed November 29, 2005 Motion for Rehearing Granted in Part and Denied in Part; Reversed and Remanded; Opinions of October 5, 2004 Withdrawn and Opinion on Rehearing filed November 29, 2005.
Austin v. Superior Courtpublic domain
85 Cal.Rptr.2d 644 (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 1126 Bessie AUSTIN et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Orange County, Respondent; Chambers, Noronha & Lowry et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. G024438. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three. June 9, 1999. *645 Smith, Smith and Harter,
Tovar-Mauricio v. T.R. Driscoll, Inc.public domain
DILLON, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with Section in of the majority’s opinion affirming the Commission’s order with respect to the issues raised in the cross-appeal filed by General Casualty Insurance Company (“General Casualty”). However, I respectfully dissent from Section II with respect to the appeal filed by the Sheet Metal Contractors Self-
In Re Tortorellipublic domain
66 P.3d 606 (2003) 149 Wash.2d 82 In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of John TORTORELLI, Petitioner. No. 71251-4. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued May 9, 2002. Decided April 10, 2003. *607 James Lobsenz, Seattle, for Petitioner. Norm Maleng, King County Prosecutor, Lynn Pru
United States v. Helaman Hansenpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-10548 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cr-00024- MCE-1 HELAMAN HANSEN, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the
Smith v. Blakey, Administratorpublic domain
213 Kan. 91 (1973) 515 P.2d 1062 CHERYL K. SMITH, Appellee, v. JAMES L. BLAKEY, Administrator, substituted for Dorothy I. Cropp, deceased, Appellant. No. 46,940 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed November 3, 1973. Robert L. Howard, of Foulston, Siefkin, Powers & Eberhardt, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Darrell L. Warta,<