Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “STEWART v. GAINES”
Stewart v. Gainespublic domain
370 F.Supp.2d 293 (2005) Lewis A. STEWART Plaintiff, v. Michael GAINES, et al., Chairperson, United States Parole Commission Defendants. No. CIV.A. 01-1756 EGS. United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 25, 2005. Lewis A. Stewart, Lorton, VA, Carl S. Nadler, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, John A. Jurata, Jr., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.
State v. Gainespublic domain
CARAWAY, J. liBy amended indictment, LaTroy Gaines was charged with one count of second degree murder in violation of La. R.S. 14:30.1. A jury found Gaines guilty as charged and he received the mandatory sentence of life imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of parole. Gaines now appeals, urging one attorney-filed assignment of error and five pro-se assignments of error all addressing the sufficiency of the evidence to
Workforce Development Cabinet v. Gainespublic domain
Dissent by Special Justice ROYSE. Respectfully, I dissent. I would reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals because Ms. Gaines failed to satisfy the express statutory prerequisites for initiating an action under KRS 61.102, and thus, the Franklin Circuit Court acted properly in granting summary judgment against her on this statutory cause of action. I believe the interpretation of KRS 61.102 is straightforw
Stewart v. United Statespublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Reginald B. Stewart appeals the district court’s order denying his request for limited discovery and dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stat
Gaines v. Statepublic domain
998 P.2d 166 (2000) Melvin Taylor GAINES, Appellant, v. The State of Nevada, Respondent. No. 33681. Supreme Court of Nevada. March 13, 2000. *167 Morgan D. Harris, Public Defender, and Sharon G. Dickinson, Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant. Frankie Sue Del Papa, Attorney General, Carson City; Stewart L. B
Ratliff v. Stewartpublic domain
508 F.3d 225 (2007) Sarah N. RATLIFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, Charles E. Gibson, III; Gigi Gibson; The Gibson Law Firm, PLLC, Appellants, v. Lawrence E. STEWART, M.D., Elder, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-61018. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. November 13, 2007. *226 *227 Charles
Stewart v. Aloiapublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Appellees J. Citron, Paul Gutman, Alan B. Haber, Lisa Hart-Cole, S. Ogawa, Ruth Miklos, Richard Neidorf, Dennis Perluss, Gerald Rosenberg and Bobbi Tillman (collectively, the “State Defendants”), move for summary affirmance of the district court’s order dismissing appellant’s complaint against the State Defendants with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b), on the groun
United States v. Gainespublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, STEWART, and STARITA Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Russell L. GAINES Aviation Boatswain’s Mate Aircraft Handling Third Class (E-4),
Stewart v. Weastpublic domain
228 F.Supp.2d 660 (2002) Carol E. STEWART v. Jerry WEAST, et al. No. CIV. JFM-00-2715. United States District Court, D. Maryland. October 28, 2002. *661 *662 Jerry R. Goldstein, Law Offices of Jerry R. Goldstein, Bethesda, MD, for plaintiff. Joann Robertson, Sharon V. Burrell, Joanne Ga
Gaines v. Statepublic domain
811 S.W.2d 245 (1991) Roderick Dewayne GAINES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 05-90-00725-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. June 11, 1991. Discretionary Review Refused October 2, 1991. *246 Bruce Anton, Dallas, for appellant. Jeffery B. Keck, Dallas, for appellee. Before STEWAR
TEAM AMERICA OF TENNESSEE v. Stewartpublic domain
On February 7, 2003, Jeffrey Stewart sued his former employer, Team America of Tennessee ("Team America"), seeking workers' compensation benefits for an injury Stewart alleged occurred on June 24, 2001. Team America answered and denied liability. Team America later asserted a third-party claim against First Baptist Church of Pleasant Grove ("First Baptist"), which had employed Stewart after he left his employment with Team America. The trial court conducted a hearing in Novembe
Kim Stewart v. Greg Stewartpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01542-COA KIM STEWART APPELLANT v. GREG STEWART APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/05/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. M. RONALD DOLEAC COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: PERRY COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPE
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Gainespublic domain
Judgment rendered February 28, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 55,473-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Gainespublic domain
Judgment rendered May 25, 2022. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 54,383-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA
People v. Stewartpublic domain
People v Stewart (2024 NY Slip Op 05546) People v Stewart 2024 NY Slip Op 05546 Decided on November 12, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <
Gaines v. Miss. Barpublic domain
CHAMBERLIN, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Philip W. Gaines petitions this Court for reinstatement to the practice of law following his suspension. Upon review of the petition, we appointed Chancellor T. K. Moffett as a special master to conduct an evidentiary hearing to develop the record further. Concerning the matters he reviewed, Chancellor Moffett recommends that Gaines be reinstated. The Mississippi Bar also supports Gaines's re
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Gainespublic domain
Judgment rendered February 22, 2023. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. ****** ON REMAND ****** No. 54,383-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND
Gaines-Tabb v. ICI Explosives, USA, Inc.public domain
EBEL, Circuit Judge. Individuals injured by the April 19, 1995, bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building (“Murrah Building”) in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, filed suit against the manufacturers of the ammonium nitrate allegedly used to create the bomb. The plaintiffs’ complaint set forth theories of negligence, negligence per se, negligent entrustment, ne
Stewart v. Kornpublic domain
KENNEDY, Justice, dissenting. I think the circuit court properly denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss. Therefore, I dissent from the issuance of the writ of mandamus. Mary P. Stewart, age 54, was admitted to Baptist Memorial Hospital with pneu-monitis on February 27, 1993. She died a few days later. Her daughter, Donna Stewart, as executrix of her estate, filed a medical malpractice comp
Gaines v. Miss. Barpublic domain
CHAMBERLIN, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Philip W. Gaines petitions this Court for reinstatement to the practice of law following his suspension. Upon review of the petition, we appointed Chancellor T. K. Moffett as a special master to conduct an evidentiary hearing to develop the record further. Concerning the matters he reviewed, Chancellor Moffett recommends that Gaines be reinstated. The Mississippi Bar also supports Gaines's re