Cases

McFadden, Judge. This is an appeal from the judgment entered on the defense verdict in a dental malpractice action. We affirmed in Stolte v. Fagan, 311 Ga. App. 123 (714 SE2d 339) (2012). In Stolte v. Fagan, 291 Ga. 477 (731 SE2d 653) (2012), our Supreme Court reversed and remanded. We therefore vacate our earlier decision. The appellant enumerated refusal to strike certain prospective j

714 S.E.2d 339 (2011) 311 Ga. App. 123 STOLTE et al. v. FAGAN et al. No. A11A0445. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 11, 2011. Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, Keith Allen Pittman, Robert C. Lamar, Atlanta, for appellants. Hall, Booth, Smith & Slover, Terrell William Benton III, Dean T. Cleaveland, Atlanta, for appellees. McFADDEN

Hunstein, Chief Justice. We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in this professional negligence action to address (1) the standard for harmless error where a trial court refuses to strike an unqualified juror and (2) the trial court’s duties under OCGA § 9-10-185 to remedy prejudicial statements by counsel. Finding that the Court of Appeals erred in its analysis of both issues, we reverse and remand for further proceedi

¶ 1. Defendant Alexander Stolte appeals the decision of the Orange Criminal Division denying his motion for bail review. Defendant, charged with second-degree murder and held without bail, requested that the court review bail based on evidence developed after his initial bail hearing in March 2010. The criminal division refused to consider the new evidence and to reopen the question of whether the evidence of defendant’s guilt is “great,” as required to

716 S.E.2d 796 (2011) 311 Ga. App. 710 STOLTE v. HAMMACK. No. A11A1221. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 16, 2011. Davis & Desautel, Stephen Bruce Davis, Andrew Craig Desautel, Atlanta, for appellant. Downey & Cleveland, Jonathan Colby Jones, for appellee. ANDREWS, Judge. Edward Stolte sued Andrew Hammack fo

730 N.W.2d 244 (2007) PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Michael STOLTE, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 132524. COA No. 272269. Supreme Court of Michigan. May 2, 2007. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

31 Kan.App. 2d 639 (2003) 70 P.3d 695 DAVID P. STOLTE, Appellant, v. WILLIAM L. CUMMINGS, J. SHELTON, J. HRABE, and J. BRAUN, Appellees. No. 89,229 Court of Appeals of Kansas Opinion filed June 13, 2003. Paula D. Hofaker, of Logan, for appellant. Robert E. Wasinger, of the Kansas Department of Corrections, for appellee.</

991 S.W.2d 336 (1999) The STATE of Texas, Appellant, v. Charles William STOLTE, Appellee. No. 2-98-491-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. April 8, 1999. *338 Tim Curry, Criminal District Attorney, Charles Mallin, John A. Stride, Shawn Paschall, Elizabeth C. Jack, and Phelesa Guy, Assistant District Attorneys, Fort Worth,

139 S.W.3d 406 (2004) James C. STOLTE, Trustee, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF GUADALUPE, Appellee. No. 04-04-00083-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. May 26, 2004. *407 David G. Pfeuffer, Brazle & Pfeuffer, L.L.P., Frank B. Suhr, New Braunfels, for appellant. Robert E. Etlinger, 1st Asst. County Atty.-Guadalupe Coun

By the Court. Judgment affirmed.

FOURTH DIVISION PHIPPS, C. J., ANDREWS, P. J and MCFADDEN, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ July 10, 201

By Judge Melvin R. Hughes, Jr. In this legal malpractice case, the defendants have requested that the court reconsider its ruling denying their Plea in Bar. The ruling was made in a November 20, 1997, opinion letter. For the following reasons the court, reconsidering, decides that its initial assessment was wrong and will change the ruling. As noted, the matter before the court is defendants’ Plea in Bar

By Judge Melvin R. Hughes, Jr. This is a legal malpractice case. Pending for decision now is defendants’ Plea in Bar. The Plea is based on fee question of fee statute of limitations applicable in an underlying case, a medical malpractice proceeding, in which fee defendants, a law firm and a lawyer in fee firm, represented plaintiff. In fee Plea, defendants state feat they cannot be held liable for legal malpractice in their r

475 So.2d 959 (1985) BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant, v. Loraine F. STOLTE and Unemployment Appeals Commission, Department of Labor and Employment Security, State of Florida, Appellees. No. BD-431. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. September 10, 1985. *960 Eric J. Holshouser of Coffman, Coleman, Henley &

328 N.W.2d 462 (1982) 213 Neb. 113 Ella Beth STOLTE, Appellant, v. Herbert A. BLACKSTONE, Appellee. No. 81-633. Supreme Court of Nebraska. December 17, 1982. Wright, Simmons & Selzer, Scottsbluff, and P.J. Heaton, Jr., Sidney, for appellant. Richard M. Van Steenberg of Van Steenberg, Brower, Chaloupka, Mullin & Holyoke, Scottsb

Ringold, J. On the morning of April 25, 1977, the date set for trial, Lenora Hall orally moved for a voluntary non-suit under CR 41(a)(1)(B). The order granting the voluntary nonsuit without prejudice provided as follows: [I]t is therefore; Ordered, adjudged and decreed that prior to refiling of Lenora W. Hall's personal injury action against Alfred H. Stolte and Ja

ON MOTION TO DISMISS GLICKSTEIN, Judge. Judgment payee Stolte, Inc. has moved to dismiss judgment payor Great American Insurance Company’s appeal. Stolte contends that the appeal is barred because Great American’s payment in full of the amount of the judgment, after Great American’s motion for retrial was denied, constitutes voluntary payment, and moots the appeal. We deny the motion.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 85-2-00397-4, Fred R. Staples, J., entered June 19, 1986. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Green, J., concurred in by Thompson, A.C.J., and Munson, J.

353 F.Supp. 1392 (1972) Kenneth W. STOLTE, Jr., Donald F. Amick, Plaintiffs, v. Melvin R. LAIRD, Secretary of Defense, Stanley R. Resor, Secretary of the Army, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 1764-70. United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 22, 1972. *1393 Edward F. Sherman, Bloomington, Ind., Melvin L. Wulf and Euge

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 80-2-01837-4, Gordon Swyter, J., entered March 5, 1981. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Green, J., concurred in by Mclnturff, C.J., and Munson, J.