Cases

OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge: Kay-R Electric Corporation (“Kay-R”), an electrical subcontractor, brought this suit under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a-270d (1988), against Stone & Webster Construction Co. (“Stone & Webster”), a general contractor that had contracted with the United States to furnish the materials and perform the labor for the construction of three buddi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-IA-00881-SCT THE MISSISSIPPI STATE PORT AUTHORITY AT GULFPORT v. EUTAW CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/22/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WINSTON L. KIDD TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: CHRISTOPHER DANIEL MEYER DORSEY R. CARSON, JR. LOWRY CHRISTOPHER LOMAX M. BRANT PETTIS

270 B.R. 1 (2001) In re STONE & WEBSTER, INCORPORATED; 1430 Enclave Parkway Corporation; 245 Summer Street Corporation; AEC International Projects, Inc.; Associated Engineers & Consultants, Inc.; Auburn VPS General Corporation; Auburn VPS Limited Corporation; Belmont Constructors Company, Inc.; Commercial Cold Storage, Inc.; DSS Engineers, Inc.; Enclave Parkway Realty, Inc.; Fast Supply Corporation; GSES Holding, LLC; International Engineers and

279 B.R. 748 (2002) In re STONE & WEBSTER, INCORPORATED; 1430 Enclave Parkway Corporation; 245 Summer Street Corporation; AEC International Projects, Inc.; Associated Engineers & Consultants, Inc.; Auburn VPS General Corporation; Auburn VPS Limited Corporation; Belmont Constructors Company, Inc.; Commercial Cold Storage, Inc.; DSS Engineers, Inc.; Enclave Parkway Realty, Inc.; Fast Supply Corporation; Gses Holding, LLC; International Engineers an

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court, Judge Kollar-Kotelly, dismissing a complaint filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in favor of a complaint filed in the federal district court for the Southern District of

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. This contract action comes before the Court following a highly choreographed “race-to-the-courthouse” in which the counterparties to an agreement concerning the design and construction of nuclear electrical generating units in Waynesboro, Georgia sought to file their mirror-image complaints first in th

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge This contract action involves an agreement concerning the design and construction of nuclear electrical generating units in Waynesboro, Georgia. On July 25, 2012, Plaintiffs Stone & Webster, Inc. and Westinghouse Electric Company LLC (together “Plaintiffs”) filed the instant [1] Compla

*594OPINION1 Mary F. Walrath, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is the Objection of the SWE & C Liquidating Trustee (the “Trustee”) to claims filed by Travelers Indemnity Company and its affiliates, including Travelers Casualty and Surety Company (“Travelers”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court w

*1130 DUBINA, Chief Judge: Petitioner Stone & Webster Construction, Inc. (“S&W”) seeks this court’s review of Respondent Secretary of Labor’s decision in favor of S&W’s former employee, James Speegle, who intervened in this case. In contradiction to the findings of an administrative law jud

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. Before the Court is a motion for sanctions filed by the plaintiff Mid-Atlantic Constructors (“Mid-Atlantic”) after the defendant Stone & Webster Construction (“Stone & Webster”) filed a subpoena on a third-party past the discovery deadline and without prior notice to the plaintiff. For the reasons set forth below, the motion for sanctions is granted and

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 19, 2012

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 19, 2012

OPINION RENDELL, Circuit Judge: This case arises from a bitter bidding dispute for a contract to strip and repaint the Commodore Barry Bridge. The Delaware River Port Authority (“DRPA”) rejected the lowest bidder, Alpha Painting & Construction Company, Inc. (“Alpha”), because it determined that Alpha was not a “responsible” contractor. Instead, DRPA awa

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER FRANK MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge. In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiffs GenOn Mid-Atlantic, LLC, and GenOn Chalk Point, LLC (together, “GenOn”), seek a determination that they need not pay defendant Stone & Webster, Inc. (“Shaw”),1 any additional money in connection with a construction contract, (ECF No. 1 Exs. 1

2020 UT App 150 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JULIE JOHNSON AND BRENT JOHNSON, Appellants, v. OKLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC., Appellee. Opinion No. 20180967-CA Filed November 5, 2020 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Andrew H

286 B.R. 532 (2002) In re STONE & WEBSTER, INCORPORATED, et al., Debtors. No. 00-02142 PJW. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. November 14, 2002. *533 Adam G. Landis, Kathleen P. Makowski, Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling, Wilmington, DE, Anthony Princi, Lorraine McGowen, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York

Opinion VERTEFEUILLE, J. The defendant, Jill P. Eder, appeals from the decision of the trial court denying her motion to discharge a mechanic’s lien filed by the plaintiff, Stone-Krete Construction, Inc., in this action for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The defendant contends that the trial court improperly concluded that the mechanic’s lien complied with the “subscribed and sworn to” require

HINES, Presiding Justice. This appeal is before this Court on certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit1 in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case which raises the issue of whether Georgia law exempts the funds in a health savings account (“HSA”) from inclusion in the bankruptcy estate. The questions certified are: (

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00238-CV ___________________________ LIVE SYSTEMS, LLC, Appellant V. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY AND IMPERIAL CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellees On Appeal from the 415th District Court Parker County, Texas Trial Court No. CV23-0544 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and W

LEVAL, Senior Circuit Judge. This appeal concerns primarily the sufficiency of a complaint alleging securities fraud under the standards of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“PSLRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4. With respect to most of the claims, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss, based principally on the court’s conclusion that the allegations we