Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “STURDIVANT v. United States”
Sturdivant v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Sturdivant v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Same case below, 420 Fed. Appx. 651.
Sturdivant v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Sturdivant v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Sturdivantpublic domain
*68Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Isaac Norel Sturdivant appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversi
Sturdivant v. United Statespublic domain
Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
Sturdivant v. United Statespublic domain
Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Sturdivantpublic domain
BAUER, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant, Juwan A. Sturdi-vant, pleaded guilty to four counts of interfering with commerce by robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and one count of using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Sturdivant appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress, having reserved the right to do so in his plea agreement. Sturdivant moved to suppress
Sturdivant v. United Statespublic domain
BELSON, Associate Judge: This case presents the question whether the warrantless search of an attic crawl space above appellant’s bedroom was permissible under the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant clause of the Fourth Amendment. The trial court denied appellant’s motion to suppress the evidence found in the crawl space. After a jury trial, at which that evidence was presented, appellant was convicted of one cou
Sturdivant v. United Statespublic domain
ZIEGLER, Judge By Special Assignment MEMORANDUM OPINION WITH ORDER ATTACHED This is an action by plaintiffs to recover income taxes paid to the United States for calendar year 1975. Plaintiffs (Mr. and Mrs. Sturdivant) contend that as residents of Puerto Rico during that tax year their income was fully taxable by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and should not have been subject to taxation by the U
United States v. Sturdivantpublic domain
513 F.3d 795 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Tyrone STURDIVANT, Appellant. United States of America, Appellant, v. Tyrone Sturdivant, Appellee. Nos. 06-3831, 06-4063. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 16, 2007. Filed: January 17, 2008. *796
United States v. Sturdivantpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee Elbert Sturdivant was convicted, following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Western District of New *24York, on one count of possession with intent to distribute and distribution of five or more grams of crack, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. On a previous appeal before this Court, we held that this count wa
Sturdivant v. Lizarragapublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Stogner v. Sturdivantpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
United States v. Tyrone Sturdivantpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-3831 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Tyrone Sturdivant, * *
Sturdivant v. Illinoispublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.
Oby v. Sturdivantpublic domain
Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Sturdivant v. McHughpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nathan Sturdivant appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea
Sturdivant v. Illinoispublic domain
App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
Sturdivant v. Kone Inc.public domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.