Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “SVB Financial Group v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,as Receiver”

Wiley v. United States (In re Wiley)public domain

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1999-09-07 · Published · cited 0× · 238 B.R. 895; 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 370; 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 1153

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW GEORGE L. PROCTOR, Bankruptcy Judge. Joseph Wiley (“Plaintiff’) and Linda Wiley (collectively “Debtors”) commenced the instant adversary proceeding after objecting to Claim 18 of the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) to Determine Dis-chargeability of Debt and to Determine Extent of Tax Liability Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 505. (Adv. Doc. 1.) The portion o

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

United States v. David Lonichpublic domain

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-01-10 · Published · cited 24× · 23 F.4th 881

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 18-10298 Plaintiff-Appellee, 18-10395 v. D.C. No. 3:17-cr-00139-SI-3 DAVID LONICH, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 18-10299 Plaintiff-Appellee, 18-10408 v. D.C. No.

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

Redback Networks, Inc. v. Mayan Networks Corp. (In Re Mayan Networks Corp.)public domain

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2004-02-05 · Published · cited 17× · 306 B.R. 295; 52 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 815; 53 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 105; 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 184; 42 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 196; 2004 WL 369886

306 B.R. 295 (2004) In re MAYAN NETWORKS CORPORATION, Debtor. Redback Networks, Inc., Appellant, v. Mayan Networks Corporation; David Judd, as the Estate Manager of Reorganized Debtor, Appellees. BAP No. NC-02-1483-JRyK, Bankruptcy No. 01-55393-ASW. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted on February 20, 2003. Fil

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: Mayan Networks Corp. → · find the judge →

Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co.public domain

District Court, E.D. Texas · 2012-06-28 · Published · cited 7× · 876 F. Supp. 2d 802; 2012 WL 2505741; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90284

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge. Before the Court are the parties’ post-trial motions. Having considered the parties’ written submissions and oral arguments, the Court: DENIES Samsung’s Renewed Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law that: (1) Samsung Does Not Infringe Any Claim of the Patents-in-Suit; (2) the Asserted Claims of the Patents-in-Suit are Invalid; (3) Samsung is No

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: Samsung Electronics Co. → · find the judge →

In Re Woodmere Investors Limited Partnershippublic domain

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995-02-03 · Published · cited 29× · 178 B.R. 346; 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 119

178 B.R. 346 (1995) In re WOODMERE INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 92-B-46455(CB). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. February 3, 1995. *347 *348 *349 Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft by Barry J. Dichter, James P. Seery, Jr., Susa

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →