Cases

225 F.Supp.2d 16 (2002) Larry D. STEWART, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Paul H. O'NEILL, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury Defendant. Reginald G. Moore, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Paul H. O'Neill, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury Defendant. Miguel A. Contreras, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Paul H. O'Neill, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 90-2841(RCL), CIV.A. 00-953(RWR

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1432 Doc: 46 Filed: 06/25/2025 Pg: 1 of 13 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1432 SALLY W. TARQUINIO, Plaintiff − Appellant, v. JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LAB,

OPINION Relators, Stewart Title Company and E. Russell Nunnally, seek the issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel the Honorable John Street, 352nd Judicial District Court Judge of Tarrant County, to vacate two orders entered subsequent to removal of the case to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas. The writ of mandamus is conditionally granted in part and denied in part. FACTS The procedural history is a

ORDER RE JURY SELECTION PROCEDURES AND MOTIONS IN LIMINE ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge. With the trial approaching, the Court here provides its instructions concerning its jury selection procedure and its rulings on the parties’ motions in limine. 1. JURY SELECTION PROCEDURE General. The Court orders that the jury be selected using the “Arizona Blind Strik

BROWN, Chief Judge. | ] Defendant, Michael Ray Stewart, appeals from an adverse judgment awarding general and special damages to plaintiffs, Sherri Renee Moore and Joseph Ford. For the reasons set forth herein, we reverse in part and amend in part the judgment of the trial court, and as amended, affirm. Facts and Procedural History This case involves a fight between a hu

MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge. Presently pending and ready for resolution in this discrimination case is the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Morgan State University (“Morgan State”), Dallas R. Evans, Warren Hayman, Martin R. Resnick, T. Joan Robinson, Benjamin Welsh,' and David Wilson. (ECF No. 34). Also pending is Defendant’s motion to strike Plaintiffs opposition to

MEMORANDUM OPINION PETER J. MESSITTE, District Judge. James Davenport, pro se, has sued Sallie Mae, Inc., and SLM Corporation (since renamed, so collectively, “Navient”), alleging numerous federal and state law violations resulting from Navient’s reporting of Davenport’s credit history to various credit reporting agencies. Navient has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 99). For

JUSTICE GOLDENHERSH delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, Sally A. Stewart, appealed from the judgment of the circuit court of Cook County entered in favor of defendant, the village of Summit, upon allowance of its motion for summary judgment. In this action plaintiff sought to recover damages for injuries suffered when she

OPINION OF THE COURT George G. Bernhard, J. This support proceeding arises out of a divorce action in the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Benson, J.), part of which has been referred to this court for determination. The father *308objects to the amended support order dated June 18, 1990 of the Hearing Examiner (Gilbert, H.E.). Th

State of Maryland v. Willie B. Stewart No. 53, September Term 2018 Criminal Law – Inconsistent Verdicts. The indictment charged the defendant with robbery, second-degree assault, and theft. The jury returned a guilty verdict on the robbery and theft charges and a not guilty verdict on the second-degree assault charge. The verdicts on the robbery and assault charges were not inconsistent so as to require reversal of the robbery conviction. Circuit Court for Baltimore County

Justice JONES Concurring in Parts IIIA, IIIC, and IV, and Concurring in the result of Part IIIB. The Court’s treatment of the issue of professional goodwill is right on point. James had urged that the Court make a distinction between the personal goodwill of his professional practice and the “enterprise” or professional goodwill of the business. In my view, the

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 31, 2011 SALLY JO WITTY v. CHRISTOPHER CANTRELL ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County No. L-17145 David R. Duggan, Judge No. E2010-02303-COA-R3-CV-FILED-JUNE 29, 2011 Sally Jo Witty is a teacher employed by the Blount County School System. She filed this ac

DAVIS, J., dissenting: I need to make clear at the outset that I support the prior decisions of this Court holding that an expert may provide evidence on the battered woman’s syndrome when a defendant asserts self-defense in a homicide prosecution. I believe such evidence is critical in domestic abuse situations where a spouse is forced to protect herself from imminent death or serious bodily injury. The facts o

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James E. Davenport appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davenport v.

PER CURIAM. Sally Stewart (Plaintiff) sued Jack and Wanda Reynolds (“Reynolds”) and the City of Reeds Spring (“City”) for damages for injuries sustained when she fell after leaving Reynolds’ store in Reeds Spring, Missouri. After Plaintiff presented her case and rested, the court directed a verdict favorable to Reynolds, but denied City’s motion for a directed verdict. Ultimately, the jury found for Plaintiff and against Cit

696 F.Supp.2d 863 (2010) LEAR AUTOMOTIVE DEARBORN, INC. and Lear Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. and Johnson Controls Interiors LLC, Defendants. Case No. 04-73461. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. March 11, 2010. David M. Hayes, Edward J. Hood, Clark Hill, Detroit, MI, Kimball R. Anderson, Winston and Strawn, Robert

585 S.E.2d 622 (2003) 262 Ga. App. 426 STEWART v. The STATE. No. A03A0414. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 11, 2003. Reconsideration Denied July 17, 2003. *623 Russell C. Gabriel, for appellant. Kenneth W. Mauldin, Dist. Atty., Julayaun M. Waters, Brian V. Patterson, Asst. Dist. A

Stewart v New York City Tr. Auth. (2014 NY Slip Op 09063) Stewart v New York City Tr. Auth. 2014 NY Slip Op 09063 Decided on December 30, 2014 Appellate Division, First Department Manzanet-Daniels, J., J. <

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Defendant Davy E. Stewart appeals from his conviction and sentence after a jury found him guilty on four counts of a six-count indictment. Stewart was acquitted on the conduct charged in Counts 1 and 2 of the indictment, and he does not challenge on appeal his conviction on Count 3, which charged him with being an unlawful user of or addict to a controlled substance in possession of a fully automat

386 S.C. 373 (2009) 688 S.E.2d 579 Marvin STEWART, individually and in his capacity as the chairman of, and as a duly elected member of Constituent School District 20; Pam Kusmider, individually and as a duly elected member of Constituent District 20; Tara Lowry, as an individual; and Constituent District Number 20, Appellants, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent. No. 4613.