Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Salud Services, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.”
Salud Services, Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc.public domain
OPINION JOEL SCHNEIDER, United States Magistrate Judge. This Opinion addresses whether plaintiffs will be granted leave to amend their consolidated MDL complaint to add more plaintiffs, change their class definition, and clarify their theory of the case insofar as their defect claim is concerned. The motion comes on the heels of the first case management conference where the Court essentially adop
TRANSFER ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman. Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407,. defendant Caterpillar, Inc. (Caterpillar) moves for centralization of this litigation in the Southern District of Florida. This litigation currently consists of five actions pending in the Eastern District of California, the Southern District of Florida, the Western District of Lo
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is plaintiff Puerto Rico Medical Emergency Group, Ine.’s motion to file a second amended complaint, (Docket No. 40), which defendants oppose, (Docket No. 43). For the reasons explained below, the Court DENIES plaintiffs motion, without prejudice. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A. Pleadings and Motions
GUSTAVO A. GELPI, United States District Judge This case involves the removal of a state court complaint and a subsequent motion to remand. (Docket Nos. 1; 13). Mennonite General Hospital, Inc. ("Plaintiff") sued Molina Healthcare of Puerto Rico, Inc. ("Molina"), MMM Healthcare, LLC ("MMM"), and MSO of Puerto Rico, Inc. ("MSO") (collectively "Defendants") in Puerto Rico state court, requesting injunctive and monetary relief for the
Dial v. Healthspring of Alabama, Inc.public domain
501 F.Supp.2d 1348 (2007) Della DIAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HEALTHSPRING OF ALABAMA, INC., and Marcus Trotter, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 2:07-0412-KDC. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division. August 9, 2007. *1349 Ted L. Mann, Mann & Cowan, P.C., Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiffs. Charles B. Paterson,
Maine Municipal Ass'n v. Mayhewpublic domain
ORDER ON MOTION TO REMAND JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge. The rules under which a federal court evaluates whether to retain a case removed from state court are occasionally obtuse. Here, the Plaintiffs filed a complaint in state court, the Defendants removed it to federal court, and the Plaintiffs want it returned to state court. Under rules peculiar to a federal court’s retention of jurisdiction in such
257 F.3d 58 (1st Cir. 2001) FAUSTINA DAVILA- ALVAREZ; RAMON FERNANDEZ-RAMIREZ; ROSA ALVAREZ-OQUENDO; RAFAEL HERNANDEZ, Plaintiffs, Appellants,v.ESCUELA DE MEDICINA UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DEL CARIBE; HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DR. RAMON RUIZ ARNAU (HOSPITAL REGIONAL DE BAYAMON);ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO; MUNICIPIO DE BAYAMON; DEPARTAMENTO DE SALUD ESTATAL; DR. EDMEE SOLTERO, FIRST PHYSICIAN; DR. RAMON MONGE, SECOND PHYSICIAN, Defend
Moline MacHinery, Ltd. v. POLLSBURY CO.public domain
259 F.Supp.2d 892 (2003) MOLINE MACHINERY, LTD., Plaintiff, v. THE PILLSBURY CO., Defendant. No. CIV.00-2352 MJD/RLE. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. March 25, 2003. *894 Joseph J. Mihalek, Duluth, MN, for plaintiff. Stephen P. Lucke, Minneapolis, MN, for defendants. ORDER DAVIS, Distric
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants 1 Faustina Dávila-Alvarez, Ramón Fernández, Rosa Alvarez-Oquendo and Rafael Fernández filed the tort action underlying this appeal in the Puerto Rico courts on November 7, 1995. It was removed to the federal district court for the District of Puerto Rico on November 25, 1997. On
Rimbert v. Eli Lilly and Co.public domain
(2008) Mark Gilbert RIMBERT, individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estates of Gilbert John Rimbert, and Olivia Acosta Rimbert, deceased, Plaintiff, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant. No. CIV 06-0874 JB/LFG. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. August 22, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Ju
El Juez Asociado Señor Alonso Alonso emitió la opinión del Tribunal. La controversia en los méritos del presente caso se cir-cunscribe a determinar si es válida la norma del patrono Puerto Rico Telephone Company (en adelante P.R.T.C.) que prohibía a sus empleados unionados —que como parte de sus funciones usuales tienen contacto con el público— uti-lizar en sus uniformes durante sus horas laborables, y en medio