Cases

626 F.Supp. 386 (1986) Samuel R. PIERCE, Jr., Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Plaintiff, v. Charlie DEW, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 85-1359-Y. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 27, 1986. Karen F. Green, Martha B. Sosman, Asst. U.S. Attys., Boston, Mass., for plaintiff. *387 Daniel S. Manning,

243 S.E.2d 177 (1978) Chester F. DEW, unmarried, Charles B. Dew et ux., Estelle G. Dew, Barbara Ann D. Shockley et vir., Robert H. Shockley, John Brook Dew et ux., Beatrice Thayer Dew, Janet Marie D. Donnelly et vir., Edwin Regan Donnelly, Grace Dew Edwards et vir., Redger L. Edwards, R. L. Edwards, Jr., unmarried, Doris Dew Matthews et vir., Russell Thomas Matthews, Erminee J. Dew Wade, widow, J. Elaine Potere et vir., William N. Potere, Jr., Willa Bell

7 . . wR~.§’LZ; /‘4’7'/ 03 6£)…@/" 02 V,Q. @/7~' ,\/p~_ Q(¢?_@/‘;L/’£B’/'/ . REcElon lN /;)L ,HVQMRT oF chMlNALAPPEAR.S § usc 2,1"{211§ § Abel Acosta, Clerk § C’O ]1.\/07`/`»5/5/47'/0,¢/ 717 77e/791 CZOq/Q,v- /7`/*Jl3 @@C¢'@T` 955 C/<”H//‘/"Q’L < / /347 27 A)OWEZMS '/'/7%/‘/' pnm/0ch (5’¢@171 M§/¢=?) f V'Zé® A/\i §.`//»0’7 hé?éf?)*$ @,<’)O

L(@;A_/p, 6 /@: L/,h@m /'@@c¢xma;( ~ :/ ¢/v_§ l /)q,da?_(>Z) _,U LUK/ hug M_; 4 05 QCO.A/W,]L' fm /,Gdl/CM+§ w ,/L_b\ /`S OU/Q S~NY'/Ué MU§_ _L:;X`LM/)(£ C°'Gd/UYQL)(S SEUWE _IUU&.S:’ n 6 0/\6+,._1_ hM(; do &M/ L~> '~QS\$ {L<> /'@M ‘}“'\A|/>([ _:£ L|{)OU 'jp`"{'i£>k) ()Q_S:l:§ A'+ M(T; +|m " LL:,E' Aé>c-"‘LJ"` /3,\ VAE_` \\ 117\"“*( Plo jj {QA 1>[&3 `

KING, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. In this auditing malpractice case, Thomas L. Wallace and T.L. Wallace Construction, Inc. (“Wallace” or ‘Wallace Construction”) appeal the Marion County Circuit Court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of McArthur, Thames, Slay, and Dews, PLLC (“McArthur Thames”) for lack of causation. Wallace seeks to recover dama

724 S.E.2d 552 (2012) Charissa YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, Fred Hart, individually, and Brett Samuels, individually, Defendants. No. COA11-1020. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 21, 2012. *554 Law Offices of Glen C. Shults, Asheville, by Glen C. Shults, for plaintiff-appellant. Goldsmith, G

273 S.W.2d 290 (1954) Harley E. WILT et al., Respondents, v. Melton V. WATERFIELD, Appellant. No. 44058. Supreme Court of Missouri. Division No. 2. November 8, 1954. Rehearing Denied December 13, 1954. *291 Irving Achtenberg, Kansas City, for appellant. Gresham, Boughan & Whipple, Walter J. Gresham, Ka

OPINION RILEY, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellant-Defendant, Rahsaan A. Johnson (Johnson), appeals his conviction of fourteen Counts of possession of animals for fighting contests, Class D felonies, Ind. Code § 35-46-3-8. We affirm. ISSUES

Opinion filed September 20, 2007

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: The survivors of Samuel Carriere appeal the removal and eventual dismissal of their wrongful death and survival actions against a number of defendants. We affirm. I. Samuel Carriere, a Sears, Roebuck and Company (Sears) security supervisor, was killed by unidentified assailants while he was investi

Certiorari to the Kansas City Court of Appeals. The opinion sought to be quashed is one that was rendered by that court in a cause lately pending before it, entitled: "State of Missouri at the relation of Laorine A. Marty, Relator, v. Samuel A. Dew, Judge of Division 6 of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, Respondent." The opinion follows: "This is an original proceeding in certiorari to review the record in a habeas corpus case in Division 6 of t

This is an action for divorce brought by the respondent against the appellant. The decree of divorce was granted by the trial court to respondent, and appellant appealed. *Page 957 The petition for divorce is in the conventional form and the grounds alleged are, in effect, that the appellant (defendant) was guilty of such indignities to plaintiff (respondent) as to render his condition intolerable in that while plaintiff was away from his home in t

Original proceeding in prohibition. On January 14, 1925, Frank W. McMillan, as plaintiff, filed in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, at Independence, his bill in equity against Kansas City Missouri River Navigation Company, a corporation, and certain individuals designated as directors, as defendants. Thereafter, on March 11, 1925, the defendants filed a general demurrer to the bill. On March 21, 1925, while the demurrer was still pending, the court of its own motion transferred the cause

Dew Bros. sued the Sugarland Railway Company as a common carrier for the reasonable market value of nine bales of cotton, upon substantially this allegation as to its liability: "That on or about the 30th day of August, 1917, plaintiffs tendered and delivered to, and defendant accepted for transportation and shipment at De Walt, Ft. Bend county, Texas, nine (9) bales of cotton, aggregating in weight five thousand (5,000) pounds, which said cotton was loaded into a car, furnished by def

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Samuel Eugene Deweese has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Deweese has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record r

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUBEN CASTILLO, Judge. Plaintiff Marlita Thomas (“Plaintiff’) brought this suit against Cook County, the Sheriff of Cook County (“Sheriff’), and various officers and medical technicians at the Cook County Department of Corrections (“CCDOC” or “Jail”) after her son, Norman Smith (“Smith”), died of pneumo-coccal meningitis on April 30, 2004, while being held as a pretrial detain

*806CLAY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The jury’s verdict should be upheld, inasmuch as the majority’s view of Federal Rule of Evidence 408 rests on an implausible reading of the Rule which cannot be reconciled with the intent of the Rule or the case law that was approved by the advisory committee’s note to Rule 408’s recent amendment. I would hold that the

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-339C Filed: December 28, 2022 CULLY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Samuel J. Fortier, Fortier & Mikko, P.C., Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff. Joseph A. Pixley and Bret R. Vallacher, Trial Attorneys, L. Misha Preheim, Assistant Director, Patricia M. McCarthy, D

Action for personal injuries. The jury found for plaintiff and assessed his damages at the sum of $15,000. Defendant has appealed from the judgment rendered on such verdict. The petition alleged several negligent acts on the part of defendant. At the request of plaintiff, the trial court gave an instruction withdrawing from the consideration of the jury all grounds of negligence alleged in the petition, except the single ground submitted in Instruction 1, which was based on the humanit

This is a suit in equity brought in the Circuit Court of Jackson County April 16, 1924, to declare void a deed made April 30, 1866, by R.J. Lewis and A.A. Goodman, to trustees, therein named, of the Grand Avenue Methodist Episcopal Church. The property conveyed is located on the corner of Grand Avenue and Ninth Street, Kansas City, and is described as lots numbered 109 and 110, Swope's addition. Upon a trial to the court in March, 1925, there was a judgment for the defendants, from whi