Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sanchez v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC”
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Hill v. Vanderbilt Capital Advisors, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Vanderbilt Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint, filed August 31, 2010 (Doc. 36); (ii) the Individual State Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Claims, filed August 31, 2010 (Doc. 41); and (iii) the Motion of the Educational Retirement Fund to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Claims Und
ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
607 F.Supp.2d 781 (2009) PETRO FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, LLC; and TA Operating, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. ALL AMERICAN PROPERTIES, INC.; et al., Defendants. All American Properties, Inc.; All American Plazas, Inc., Counter Plaintiffs, v. Petro Franchise Systems, LLC; and TA Operating LLC, Counter Defendants. No. EP-08-CV-387-KC. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE William Spencer and Spencer Brothers LLC v. Civil No. 18-cv-1191-LM Opinion No. 2020 DNH 147 Michael Doran, et al. O R D E R Plaintiffs William Spencer (“William”) and Spencer Brothers LLC (“Spencer Brothers”) filed a second amended complaint bringing two claims against five current and
ACCEPTED 14-14-00855-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/18/2015 12:34:30 PM
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
Eastern Maine Medical Center v. Walgreen Co.public domain
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2025 ME 10 Docket: BCD-23-73 Argued: March 7, 2024 Decided: February 6, 2025 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ. EASTERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTER et al. v. WALGREEN CO. et al. HORTON, J. [¶1] Eastern Maine Medica
AU Electronics, Inc. v. Harleysville Group, Inc.public domain
Memorandum Opinion and Order GARY FEINERMAN, District Judge This insurance coverage dispute pits AU Electronics, Adnan Vadria, and Umair Ya-sin (collectively, “AU,” unless context requires otherwise) against Harleysville Group and Harleysville Lake States Insurance Company (together, “Harleysville,” unless context requires otherwise). In the underlying suits, Sprint and T-Mobile, the large wire
City of Evanston v. N. Ill. Gas Co.public domain
John Z. Lee, United States District Judge After several environmental studies, the City of Evanston ("the City") found contaminants known as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ("PAHs") in the soil in the area of James Park, as well as on and around a decommissioned water main that runs along Dodge Avenue ("the Dodge Water Main"). The City also found high levels of methane gas at certain points around James Park. The City attributes th
Riccatone v. Colorado Choice Health Planspublic domain
Opinion by JUDGE KAPELKE * 1 Plaintiffs, Kirsten K. Riceatone, Brian Ricceatone, and Ashlee D. Duran, appeal from the summary judgments entered by the district court in favor of defendants, Colorado Choice Health Plans, doing business as San Luis Valley Health Maintenance Organization (Choice), Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. (GBS), and CNIC Health Solutions, Inc. (CNIC). We affirm.
Tesla v. NLRBpublic domain
Case: 21-60285 RESTRICTED Document: 259-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED October 25, 2024 No. 21-6028
Doyle v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge: This case presents a question that appears to be of first impression: whether someone who performs community service as a condition of an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (“ACD”) of criminal charges qualifies as an “employee” for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “FLSA” or “Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Plaintiffs
606 F.Supp.2d 201 (2009) RENAISSANCE MARKETING, INC., Plaintiff v. MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Alpha One Security Solutions, Inc., Jorge Javier Marrero, Jane Doe, John Doe, ABC Company, XYZ Insurance Company, Defendants. Civil No. 08-1823 (SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 31, 2009. *203 Ramon L. Gara
Applied Capital, Inc. v. Gibsonpublic domain
(2007) APPLIED CAPITAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. Francis GIBSON; Gary Bellinger; Brian Ambrose; Kirk Voyles; Heritage Commercial Services, Inc.; Gerald Lee Scogin, Jr; Grizzly Drilling, Inc.; Justin Herman, New Energy Co., L.L.C., and Edward L. Presley, Defendants. No. CV 05-00098 JB/ACT. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. August 31, 2007. MEMORANDU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-2320 (RBW) ) FEDERAL BUREAU OF
Denver Homeless Out Loud v. Denver, Coloradopublic domain
Appellate Case: 21-1025 Document: 010110679283 Date Filed: 05/03/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 3, 2022
Jenkins v. University of Minnesotapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Stephanie, Jenkins brings this action alleging sexual harassment and several common law tort claims against Defendants Ted Swem, Dr. David Andersen, and the University of Minnesota (“the University”). Jenkins alleges that while she was conducting research for her Ph.D. program with the University, Swem, a scientist from the United States Fi
Leshinsky v. Telvent GIT, S.A.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Phillip Leshinsky brought this action against Defendants Telvent GIT, *436S.A. (“Telvent GIT”), Telvent Farradyne, Inc. (“Farradyne”), Telvent Caseta, Inc. (“Caseta”), Glenn Deitiker, and Alfredo Escriba (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging whistleblower claims under Sectio
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 7, 2013. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00893-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LAR