Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sandra A. Manning”
Manning v. CitiMortgage, Inc. (In re Manning)public domain
ORDER BRUCE A. HARWOOD, Bankruptcy Judge. In this adversary proceeding, Kevin M. Manning (the “Debtor” or “Plaintiff’) seeks a determination that CitiMortgage, Inc. (the “Defendant”) is liable for violating the discharge injunction contained in 11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(2). Before the Court are the Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc No. 36) (the “Plaintiffs Motion”) and the Defendant
Dustin Buxton v. Sandra Kurtinitispublic domain
FLOYD, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant, Dustin Buxton, applied and was denied admission into the Radiation Therapy Program (RTP) at the Community College of Baltimore County (CCBC) in 2013 and 2014. Buxton brought *425 this action alleging that points were deducted from his application score and
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING CIKLIN, C.J. We deny the appellant’s motion for rehearing. Because of the inclusion of a dissent to our denial of the motion for rehearing, we re-issue our February 18, 2015 opinion with the addition of the dis*271sent to allow the appeal to be considered in full context. Simon and Sandra Docksw
Manning v. Chamberspublic domain
290 B.R. 328 (2003) Sylvia MANNING, not individually, but in her capacity as Chancellor of the University of Illinois at Chicago, Appellant, v. Sandra Ann CHAMBERS, Appellee. No. 02 C 8834. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 25, 2003. *329 Norman P. Jeddeloh, Deborah H. Shefrin, Barry A. Chatz
Eduardo Guzman v. Sandra Shewrypublic domain
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION ORDER The opinion filed in this case on September 23, 2008, 544 F.3d 1073, is AMENDED as follows: At page 13362, line 24, 544 F.3d at 1078, of the slip opinion, after the sentence concluding “halt the temporary suspension,” insert a new footnote reading <In his complaint, Guzman alleges that he also brings this
Chambers v. Manning (In Re Chambers)public domain
283 B.R. 913 (2002) In re Sandra Ann CHAMBERS, Debtor. Sandra Ann Chambers, Plaintiff, v. Sylvia Manning, not individually, but in her capacity as Chancellor of the University of Illinois at Chicago, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 99 B 33040. Adversary No. 01 A 00355. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 1, 2002.
NUMBER 13-20-00072-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG SANDRA CORTINAS A/K/A SANDRA RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 156th D
Artamendi v. Manningpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Upon the conclusion that the evidence adduced below established that the standards of United States v. Nebbia, 357 F.2d 303 (2d Cir.1966) were satisfied as a matter of law, the trial court is ordered to require- the acceptance of the tendered $700,000.00 bond and thereupon to release the petitioner from custody. Habeas Corpus granted.
BLACK, Circuit Judge: Appellants, the School Board of Hills-borough County, Florida, and its officials, appeal two orders of the district court which subject them to continued supervision under a federal desegregation decree. See Manning v. Sch. Bd. of Hillsborough County, Fla., 24 F.Supp.2d 1277 (M.D.Fla.), mot. to alter or amend den., mot. for clari
People v. Manningpublic domain
People v Manning (2024 NY Slip Op 02431) People v Manning 2024 NY Slip Op 02431 Decided on May 3, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <
Frank Ronald Marek v. Earl A. Lawrencepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 38827 FRANK RONALD MAREK and GAYLE A. ) MAREK, husband and wife, ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ) Lewiston, May 2012 Term v. ) ) 2012 Opinion No. 81 EARL A. LAWRENCE and SANDRA L. ) LAWRENCE,
Commonwealth v. Manningpublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM: Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted. LARSEN and McDERMOTT, JJ., dissent.
Sandra C. Parker v. Rodney Boyerpublic domain
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Sandra and Dana Parker made claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and under state law against police officers who conducted a search of their home. They made similar claims against a television station whose reporting crew entered the house after the police did. The district court granted summary judgment for the Parkers against three police officers on their fourth-amendment claims and granted
Manning v. School Bd. of Hillsborough County, FLpublic domain
135 F.Supp.2d 1192 (2001) Andrew L. MANNING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The SCHOOL BOARD OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA (formerly Board of Public Instruction of Hillsborough County, Florida), et al., Defendants. No. 8:58CV3554T17EAJ. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. January 10, 2001. *1193 Marianne Engelma
People v. Manningpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest Illinois Official Reports to the accuracy
People v. Manningpublic domain
2020 IL App (2d) 180042 No. 2-18-0042 Opinion filed July 16, 2020 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE
244 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 2001) Andrew L. MANNING, a minor, by his father and next friend, Willie MANNING, Shayron R. Reed, by her father and next friend, Sanders B. Reed, Sandra E. Reed, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.THE SCHOOL BOARD OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA (formerly Board of Public Instruction of Hillsborough County, Florida), Clyde McLeod, et al., Defendants- Appellants. No. 99-2049.
Chambers, Sandra Ann v. Manning, Sylviapublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-1557 IN R E: SANDRA ANN CHAMBERS, Debtor-Appellee, APPEAL OF: SYLVIA MANNING, not individually, but in her capacity as Chancellor of the University of Illinois at Chicago. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the No
Manning v. School Bd. of Hillsborough County, Fla.public domain
24 F.Supp.2d 1277 (1998) Andrew L. MANNING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE SCHOOL BOARD OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA (formerly Board of Public Instruction of Hillsborough County, Florida), et al., Defendants. No. 58-3554-CIV-T-17. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. October 26, 1998. *1278
Sandra Dottenwhy v. Aspirus, Inc.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 23-1660 and 23-1661 MEGAN PASSARELLA and SANDRA DOTTENWHY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ASPIRUS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the