⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

15 opinions for “Sandra Joyce Macon”

Powell v. Powellpublic domain
District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1995-02-17 · Published · cited 0× · 877 F. Supp. 628; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2131; 1995 WL 75396
877 F.Supp. 628 (1995) Eugene E. POWELL, Plaintiff, v. Joyce Marie POWELL, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 94-110-VAL (WDO). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division. February 17, 1995. *629 Sandra J. Popson, Macon, GA, for plaintiff. Eugene E. Powell, pro se. W. Edward Meeks, Jr., Ocilla, GA, f
Powell v. Powellpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996-04-15 · Published · cited 86× · 80 F.3d 464; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7734; 1996 WL 143407
CARNES, Circuit Judge: Pursuant to the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act (the “FSPA”), 10 U.S.C. § 1408, a state court awarded part of Eugene Powell’s naval retirement pay to his ex-wife, Joyce Powell, as alimony. Instead of appealing that award, Mr. Powell filed a complaint in federal district court against Mrs. Powell and John Dalton, who is Secretary of the Nav
State v. Moorepublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011-09-07 · Published · cited 0× · 75 So. 3d 22; 2011 La.App. 4 Cir. 0025; 2011 La. App. LEXIS 1025; 2011 WL 4000812
75 So.3d 22 (2011) STATE of Louisiana v. Cleveland MOORE. No. 2011-KA-0025. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. September 7, 2011. *23 Leon A. Cannizzaro, Jr., District Attorney, Brad Scott, Assistant District Attorney, New Orleans, LA, for State of Louisiana. Mary Constance Hanes, Louisiana Appellate Project, Ne
In re ROC Pretrialpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001-10-10 · Published · cited 0× · 75 S.W.3d 15; 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 6762; 2001 WL 1195696
We are asked to consider whether a nonsuit order is void to the extent it dismisses claims not encompassed by the motion for nonsuit. We hold the order is not void and therefore dismiss the appeals of 155 appellants against nine appellees. Factual and Procedural Background This appeal arises out of a mass tort action that consolidated eighteen cases involving over eight thousand plaintiffs and over thirty defendants. The notice of appeal and t
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015-05-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2015 Ark. 200
Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989-11-13 · Published · cited 16× · 887 F.2d 1438
887 F.2d 1438 56 Ed. Law Rep. 777 Willie Eugene PITTS, a minor, by his mother and next friend,Mrs. Anna Mae PITTS, Victor Martin; a minor, by his fatherand next friend, Robert L. Martin; Kelvin, Felicia, Alfred,Orma, and Alfredia Henderson, minors, by their mother andnext friend, Rebecca Henderson, Patricia Joyce Reeves, aminor, by her mother and next friend, Mrs. Rosa Lee Reeves;Anthony Reed a
Ex Parte Edwardspublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001-01-12 · Published · cited 25× · 816 So. 2d 98; 2001 WL 29232
Because I believe the trial judge did not err in refusing to instruct the jury as requested by the defendant, I must respectfully dissent. Punishing a defendant for unintentionally causing the death of another while in the commission of a misdemeanor is not a new legal concept, in either a criminal case or a civil case. For example, in Pippin v. State,19 Ala. App. 384, 387, 97 So. 615<
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2011-08-19 · Published · cited 2× · 791 F. Supp. 2d 431; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93019; 2011 WL 2119256
791 F.Supp.2d 431 (2011) ASHLEY II OF CHARLESTON, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PCS NITROGEN, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Ross Development Corporation; J. Holcombe Enterprises, L.P.; James H. Holcombe; J. Henry Fair, Jr.; Allwaste Tank Cleaning, Inc. n/k/a PSC Container Services, LLC; Robin Hood Container Express, Inc.; City of Charleston, South Carolina, Third-Party Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:05-cv-2782-MBS.<
District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1995-09-29 · Published · cited 0× · 904 F. Supp. 1315; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15519
904 F.Supp. 1315 (1995) Larry ROE, Perry O. Hooper, Sr., James D. Martin, and Willie J. Williams, Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Persons, Plaintiffs, v. MOBILE COUNTY APPOINTING, BOARD, Honorable Lionel W. Noonan, Wilcox County Appointing Board, Honorable Jerry Boggan, As Representatives of Those Persons Who are Designated by Alabama State Law as the Appointing Boards in Each of Alabama's Counties and Those Persons Who Are Designated by
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002-11-26 · Published · cited 1× · 313 F.3d 447; 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 293; 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1141; 2002 Daily Journal DAR 13303; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24125; 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,353; 90 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 641
313 F.3d 447 Eleanor STATON; Beverly Trotter; Kevin Biglow, Plaintiffs-Appellants,Solomon Williams; Shirley Miller; Deborah Woods; Wendy Kelly; Myron Knight; Michael Eckles; Donald Ballard; William Bell, Clarence Thompson; Doreen Ferguson; Cynthia Evans; Willie Wilson; Mary Dean; Brian Todd; Tim Jones; David Brawley; Mara Ferrari; Rhonda Capps; Charles Jones; David Roberts; Verlene Maholmes; Terry Fisher; Carol Calender; Evalean Moore; Ralph Wi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003-04-29 · Published · cited 1050× · 327 F.3d 938; 55 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1299; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8139; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3610; 2003 WL 1964051
327 F.3d 938 Eleanor STATON; Beverly Trotter; Kevin Biglow, Plaintiffs-Appellants,Solomon Williams; Shirley Miller; Deborah Woods; Wendy Kelly; Myron Knight; Michael Eckles; Donald Ballard; William Bell; Clarence Thompson; Doreen Ferguson; Cynthia Evans; Willie Wilson; Mary Dean; Brian Todd; Tim Jones; David Brawley; Mara Ferrari; Rhonda Capps; Charles Jones; David Roberts; Verlene Maholmes; Terry Fisher; Carol Calender; Evalean Moore; Ralph Wi
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989-10-11 · Published · cited 0× · 887 F.2d 1438; 1989 WL 125728
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge: In 1985, in this case, we stated: The district court[’s] ... characterization of the DeKalb County School System as unitary was error. As the defendants suggest, it is possible that the district court did not intend its use of the word ‘unitary’ to be equated with the unitary status that requires dismissal of the action. The court may have been stating merely that a co
District Court, S.D. New York · 1995-10-20 · Published · cited 8× · 903 F. Supp. 532
903 F.Supp. 532 (1995) The STATE OF NEW YORK, by Attorney General Dennis C. VACCO, et al., Plaintiff, v. REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LTD., et al., Defendants. No. 95 Civ. 3143 (JGK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 20, 1995. Pamela Jones Harbour, Joseph Opper, Linda J. Gargiulo, Assistant Attorneys General, New York City, for State of New York and loca
Luevano v. Campbellpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 1981-11-19 · Published · cited 1× · 93 F.R.D. 68; 27 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 721; 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18023; 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,322
ORDER MODIFYING THE LIST OF DEFENDANT CLASS MEMBERS JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge. The parties have jointly approached the Court and requested modification of the list of members of the defendant class in this case, attached to the proposed Consent Decree as Appendix B. For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED, that: 1. (a) The Federal Reserve System, which is c
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002-11-26 · Published · cited 5× · 313 F.3d 447; 2002 WL 31656586
TROTT, Circuit Judge, Dissenting: As they always do, my conscientious colleagues display a thorough and scholarly grasp of the issues that arise in the settlement of class lawsuits. With all respect, however, I see this settlement and the district court’s approval of it in a different light. Thus, I respectfully dissent. Three main worries, each of which in my view is just an illusion, app