Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Santos v. Allied International Credit Corp., (US)”
Depianti v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.public domain
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Generation after generation of parents have passed along a basic adage to their children: if at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. Such advice encouraging perseverance can serve one well throughout a myriad of life experiences. But while steadfast determination may, in the abstract, be worthy of aspiration, the legal field has—as is often the case—mad
Depianti v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CONCERNING SUMMARY JUDGMENT WOLF, District Judge. I. OVERVIEW. .116 II.BACKGROUND. 00 t—i A. Facts.■. 00 rH B. Procedural History. 05 t—H III.MOTIONS TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE PLEADINGS K o A. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Complaint. í3 o B. JPI’s Motion to File a Supplemental Answer
*565OPINION OF THE COURT Edward J. Greenfield, J. Plaintiff Credit Francais International, S. A., is a French banking corporation headquartered in Paris which was part of an international consortium of nine banks which loaned $25,000,000 to defendant Sociedad Financiera de Comercio, C. A., a Venezuelan financial institution, pursuant to a written depo
Grasso Enters., LLC v. CVS Health Corp.public domain
ORDER XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judge. On this date, the Court considered Defendants CVS Health Corporation, Care-mark, LLC, and CaremarkPCS Health, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration (docket no. 44) and each party’s subsequent responses (docket nos. 23, 24, 42, and 43). The Court also considered Plaintiff Grasso Enterprises, LLC’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (docket no. 26) and the sub
Hodges v. Sasil Corp.public domain
Justice ZAZZALI delivered the opinion of the Court. Plaintiffs, two sisters living in separate, federally-subsidized apartments, were regularly behind on their rent. Their missed rental payments prompted the filing of several summary dispossess actions seeking eviction. The summonses and complaints, prepared by the landlord’s attorneys, labeled the total amount due and owing — the actual monthly rental obligati
Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. ExxonMobil Corp.public domain
194 F.Supp.2d 378 (2002) SAUDI BASIC INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, Individually And in the Name of, and On Behalf of, Al-Jubail Petrochemical Company, A Partnership, Plaintiff, v. EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION, Defendant. Exxonmobil Corporation, Exxon Chemical Arabia, Inc., and Mobil Yanbu Petrochemical Company, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation, Defendant. Civil Action Nos. 98-4897(WHW), 00-3841(WHW).</
OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: These consolidated putative class actions are the latest in a series of cases in recent years to allege a longstanding conspiracy by some of the world’s largest banks to manipulate a benchmark interest rate. -In the other cases, plaintiffs allege efforts to fix the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), see, e.g., In re LIBOR-Based Fin. Inst
In Re Enron Corp.public domain
325 B.R. 671 (2005) In re ENRON CORP., et al., Reorganized Debtors. Enron Corp., Plaintiff, v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., et al., Defendants. Enron Corp., Plaintiff, v. Mass Mutual Life Insurance Co., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 01 B 16034(AJG), Adversary No. 03-92677 A, Adversary No. 03-92682 A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. June 15,
MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINTS ARTHUR J. GONZALEZ, Bankruptcy Judge. The issue presented is whether payments made by various entities in connection with certain transactions involving short-term commercial paper are “settlement payments” within the context of 11 U.S.C. § 546(e) which would, as a matter of law, preclude the relief sought by the plaintiff in the adversary
Toomey, J. Plaintiff, West Boylston Cinema Corporation (“West Boylston”), an exhibitor of “sub-run” movies,1 brings this action against National Amusements, Inc. (“National”), a competing exhibitor, and Paramount Pictures Corporation (“Paramount”), a movie distributor, alleging that Paramount’s grant of a “clearance” to National (i.e. licensing that enabled National to run allegedly more profitable “
Opinion issued August 28, 2025. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00651-CV ——————————— HUMPHRIES CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Appellant V. HIGHLAND VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, HIGHLAND VILLAGE GP LLC, HIGHLA
Bank of America Corp. v. Lemgruberpublic domain
385 F.Supp.2d 200 (2005) BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; Bank of America, N.A.; Bank of America Overseas Corporation; and Bankamerica International Financial Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Antonio Carlos Braga LEMGRUBER; Goldbeach Holdings Corporation; Powerstone Corporation; Timber Springs Corporation; Tiger International Overseas Corp.; American Versailles Fund; Santa Escolastica, Inc.; Interbrett Investec Group; Blue Water Capital; Agropastoril Aven
791 F.Supp. 489 (1992) BIEC INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. GLOBAL STEEL SERVICES, LTD., James L. Forand, Jr., Angelo R. Borzillo, James J. Connolly, and Paik W. Shin, Defendants. No. 92-0108. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 5, 1992. *490 *491
536 F.3d 68 (2008) AMERICAN STEEL ERECTORS, INC., Ajax Construction Co., American Aerial Services, Inc., Bedford Ironworks, Inc., and D.F.M. Industries, Inc., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. LOCAL UNION NO. 7, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL & REINFORCING IRON WORKERS, Defendant, Appellee. No. 07-1832. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. He
ACCEPTED 01-15-00989-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/3/2015 1:47:58 PM
711 F.Supp.2d 697 (2008) SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION and AAA Bonding Agency, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-05-cv-2159. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 24, 2008. *700 Joseph S. Grinstein, Susman Godfrey LLP, Alan
Kemp Industries, Inc. v. Safety Light Corp.public domain
857 F.Supp. 373 (1994) KEMP INDUSTRIES, INC. and Apollo Associates, Ltd., Plaintiffs, v. SAFETY LIGHT CORP., USR Industries, Inc., USR Chemicals, Inc., USR Lighting, Inc., USR Metals, Inc., U.S. Natural Resources, Inc., The Prudential Insurance Company of America and John Does I-X, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 92-95 (AJL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 28, 1994.<
Huertas v. East River Housing Corp.public domain
674 F.Supp. 440 (1987) Julio HUERTAS, Carmen Melendez, Francisco Garcia, Rosaria Esperon, Raphael Negron, Angelo Vasquez, Maria Sanchez, Joyce Johnson, and Betty Johnson, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, and the Lower East Side Joint Planning Council On Housing and It's Time, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. EAST RIVER HOUSING CORP., Seward Park Housing Corp., Hillman Housing Corp., Amalgamated Dwellings, Inc., Ralph Lippma
Opinion issued April 21, 2026. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00651-CV ——————————— HUMPHRIES CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Appellant V. HIGHLAND VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, HIGHLAND VILLAGE GP LLC, HIGHL
Ezpeleta v. Sisters of Mercy Health Corp.public domain
621 F.Supp. 1262 (1985) Elena EZPELETA, M.D., Plaintiff, v. SISTERS OF MERCY HEALTH CORPORATION, a Michigan Corporation, Defendant. No. H 83-143. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division. July 9, 1985. *1263 *1264 *1265 Robert G. Berger,