Cases

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 511 KA 14-01961 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V ORDER DAMIAN MACHADO-RODRIGUEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (SARA A. GOLDFARB OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DIS

807 N.E.2d 1100 (2004) 347 Ill. App.3d 638 283 Ill.Dec. 259 Lusta JOHNSON, Jr., a Minor, by his Father and Next Friend, Lusta JOHNSON, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 1-02-2689, 1-02-2868:C. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. March 31, 2004.<

226 F.2d 475 Manuel Machado MEDINA, Appellant and Cross-Appellee,v.Sara ERICKSON, Administratrix of the Estate of Peter Erickson, Deceased, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.Sara ERICKSON, Administratrix of the Estate of Peter Erickson, Deceased, Appellant,v.Manuel Machado MEDINA, Appellee. No. 14186. No. 14194. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.<

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge: Appellant Daniel Brink, joined by thirty-one other individuals, brought a class action lawsuit stemming from the workers’ compensation benefits owed to class members under the Defense Base Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1651 et seq., for injuries suffered

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 294 KA 14-01615 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FREDDIE JACKSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (SARA A. GOLDFARB OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRAC

CORRECTED OPINION WARNER, J. In this challenge to a development order permitting mining on U.S. Sugar’s property within the Agricultural Production Future Land Use area in Palm Beach County, the trial court granted summary judgment holding that the order is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan of Palm Beach County and enjoining activities under that order, based upon 1000 Friends of Fla., Inc. v.

MEMORANDUM OPINION EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs, thirty-one civilian government contractor employees (and/or their surviving relatives), bring this purported class action against twenty-three defendants, which include United States government contractors (the “Contractor Defendants”) and their insurance carriers (the “Insurer D

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL RICHARD CHARLES Certiorari acogido BROWN WOOD Y como APELACIÓN MARICARMEN GIANATI procedente del MEDINA Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Apelados

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 10-AUG-2026 07:50 AM Dkt. 83 SO

AFFIRMED as modified; and Opinion Filed January 31, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01459-CR REYNALDO PALOMO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal Distri

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND REMANDING THE CASE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Following Charles Borreani’s death, his surviving relatives filed suit against Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, and Kaiser Permanente Medical Group (collectively “Kaiser”) alleging they withheld critical infor

Filed 9/28/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR A166355 In re UBER TECHNOLOGIES WAGE AND HOUR CASES. (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CJC-21-005179; J.C.C.P.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1921 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:23-cr-00055- SOM-1 v. LUIS MIGUEL CASTRO ALAVEZ, OPINION Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United State

WIIG, District Judge. The questions presented in these appeals and cross-appeals from a decree and orders of the trial court, involving the same parties and arising out of the same factual situation, were consolidated for argument and disposition in this court. Peter Erickson’s administratrix was awarded the sum of $6,041.40 as the chief engineer’s share of the catch of the fishing vessel D/V Alphecca for

USCA11 Case: 24-10131 Document: 99-1 Date Filed: 11/19/2025 Page: 1 of 21 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10131 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Justice HOBBS delivered the Opinion of the Court. INDEX OF OPINION INtrOGUCtOM ............... ...se asr kee keren + ek en re e e e r eae n e e e aa a ee e e ea ae ee eee. 653 sml 654 I. FACKS .... ...... .. sll sles vy a area a k ea een 6 k ea a arn e n e ea aa na n e e a a a ee e e aa e aa ee es 654 A. The Burlington-Barr Lake System ........

810 F.Supp.2d 1100 (2011) In re HYDROXYCUT MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. Case No. 09md2087BTM (CAB). United States District Court, S.D. California. August 29, 2011. *1104 Gayle M. Blatt, Casey, Gerry, Schenk, Francavilla, Blatt & Penfield LLP, Todd D. Carpenter, Tonna K. Farrar, Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint,

BRORBY, Circuit Judge. The Government of Northern Ireland, United Kingdom issued warrants for the arrest of Appellant, George Finbar Ross, for forty-one charged offenses stemming from Mr. Ross’ alleged involvement in a fraudulent investment scheme. The United States subsequently arrested Mr. Ross pursuant to an extradition treaty existing between the United States and the United

291 S.C. 401 (1987) 353 S.E.2d 884 Sara Rikard SUTTON, Petitioner-Respondent v. Harold Edwin SUTTON and Barbara B. Sutton, Respondents, of whom Harold Edwin Sutton is Appellant. 0888 Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard December 15, 1986. Decided March 2, 1987. *402

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH FEB 17 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS