Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. This action arises out of statements regarding the internal controls and accounting practices of Weatherford International Ltd. (“Weatherford” or the “Company”), after Weatherford announced in 2011 that it had understated its tax expenses from 2007 through 2010 by over $500 million. Lead plaintiff American Federation of Musicians and Employer’s Pension F

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge. Pending before the Court are the following motions: Filed by Plaintiff Tesco Corporation (“Tesco” or “Plaintiff’): — Motion for Entry of Judgment on the Verdict as a Matter of Law, or Alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 711)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge. Pending before the Court are the following motions: — Frank’s Casing Crew & Rental Tools, Inc.’s (“Frank’s”) Motion for Attorney’s Fees for Post-Trial Discovery and New Trial (if Granted) (Doc. No. 633); — Frank’s Posh-Trial Motion for Summary Judgment on Obviousness Base

722 F.Supp.2d 755 (2010) TESCO CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL INC., National Oilwell Varco, L.P., Offshore Energy Services, Inc., and Frank's Casing Crew & Rental Tools, Inc., Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-cv-2531. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. August 5, 2010. *758 Glenn A.

750 F.Supp.2d 780 (2010) TESCO CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL, INC., National Oilwell Varco, L.P., Offshore Energy Services, Inc., and Frank's Casing Crew & Rental Tools, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-08-2531. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 27, 2010. *785 Gle

722 F.Supp.2d 737 (2010) TESCO CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL, INC., National Oilwell Varco, L.P., Offshore Energy Services, Inc., and Frank's Casing Crew & Rental Tools, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-08-2531. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. January 5, 2010. *738 Glenn

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-15-00338-CV TOWN OF SHADY SHORES APPELLANT V. SARAH SWANSON APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 442ND DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

815 F.Supp.2d 1204 (2011) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF KANSAS AND WESTERN MISSOURI, Plaintiff, v. Sandy PRAEGER, Kansas Insurance Commissioner, in her official capacity, Defendant. Case No. 11-2462-WEB-KGG. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 29, 2011. *1206 Andrew D. Beck, Brigitte Amiri, Jennifer Dalven, Ame

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-05-327-CR COY WAYNE WALKER APPELLANT V.

COLBERT, J. ¶ 1 This appeal determines the constitutionality of section 57 of the Administrative Worker’s Compensation Act (AWCA), found at title 85A of the Oklahoma Statutes. Following a review of the record on appeal, the transcripts of the proceedings below, and the briefs of the parties and amici, this Court holds the forfeiture provision found at section 57 of title 85A violates the adequa

SARAH S. VANCE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *714Both parties move for summary judgment on plaintiff's claim of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,413,725 ('725 Patent).1 Plaintiff also mov

MEMORANDUM OPINION STEPHEN C. ST. JOHN, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion for Contempt against Col-linswood Lake Apartments, LLC, George Eberwine, and Kittrell Eberwine and the Motion for Sanctions (collectively, the “Sanctions Motion”) filed by Robert Edward Seaton, Jr., and Sarah Nichole Sea-ton on June 27, 2011. An evidentiary hearing was held on the Sanctions Motion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The petitioner,' Danilo Alexander Pine-da, wasinitially detained as an inadmissible criminal alien by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in January 2014. In this Petition for a Writ, of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, he seeks a second bond hearing under the Second Circuit’s decision in Lora v. Shanahan, 804 F.3d 60

COMBS, Y.C.J.: FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 1 The focus of this appeal concerns the validity of HB 2630; 2014 Okla. Sess. Laws c. 375 (effective November 1, 2014). 1 HB 2630 created the Retirement Freedom Act (74 O.S. Supp. 2014, § 935.1 et seq.). The main purpose of HB 2630 was to create a new

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-340 Filed: 3 March 2020 Cumberland County, No. 13 CVD 5523 MARIA HONTZAS POULOS, Plaintiff v. JOHN EMANUEL POULOS, AJ PROPERTIES OF FAYETTEVILLE, LLC, BEAR ONE INVESTMENTS, LLC, BEAR PLUS ONE, LLC, BEAR SIX INVESTMENTS, LLC, CUMBERLAND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, LLC, FAYETTEVILLE ENDOSCOPY, LLC, FAYETTEVILLE GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOCIATES, PA, ICARIAN PARTNERS,

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by email at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-340 Filed: 3 March 2020 Cumberland County, No. 13 CVD 5523 MARIA HONTZAS POULOS, Plaintiff v. JOHN EMANUEL POULOS, AJ PROPERTIES OF FAYETTEVILLE, LLC, BEAR ONE INVESTMENTS, LLC, BEAR PLUS ONE, LLC, BEAR SIX INVESTMENTS, LLC, CUMBERLAND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, LLC, FAYETTEVILLE ENDOSCOPY, LLC, FAYETTEVILLE GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOCIATES, PA, ICARIAN PARTNERS,

OPINION MAY, Judge. David M. Green appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. He argues his trial counsel was ineffective because counsel did not object to the empaneling of an anonymous jury at Green’s murder trial. We affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I agree with the majority that the Weatherford suit constituted a public disclosure, thereby triggering the requirement that the relators be “original sources” in order to proceed with their qui tarn suit. I disagree, however, with the majority’s assessment of the record, and conclude that Szerlip has met her burden of showing “original source” status, thereby

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2025 ND 216 In the Matter of the Estate of Marvin C. Lepp, Deceased Murray J. Lepp, Personal Representative, Petitioner and Appellant and Michael L. Lepp, Personal Representative, Petitioner and Appellee v. Maureen J. Lepp, and Dacotah Bank, Respondents and Appellees and Myron C. Lepp, Myra M. American Horse, Maxine J.