Cases

LOURIE, Circuit Judge, dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc without opinion. WALLACH, Circuit Judge, dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC PER CURIAM. ORDER A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by appellant Schaeffler Group USA, Inc., and responses t

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge WALLACH. O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”) provided for the distribution of antidumping duties collected by the United States to “affected domestic producers” (“ADPs”) of the dumped goods. See Pub.L. No. 106-387, §§ 1001-03, 114 Stat. 1549, 1549A-72 to - 75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)),

OPINION CARMAN, Judge: Plaintiff brought five cases 1 challenging the constitutionality of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA” or “Byrd Amendment”). 2 These cases were consolidated by order of the

781 F.Supp.2d 1358 (2011) SCHAEFFLER ITALIA S.R.L. and Schaeffler Group USA, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Timken Company, Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 11-73. Court No. 09-00386. United States Court of International Trade. June 22, 2011. *1359 Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. From 1973 to 1982, FAG Bearings Corporation released thousands of gallons of trichloroethylene (TCE), a volatile organic compound now classified as a hazardous substance, at its manufacturing facility in Joplin, Missouri. In 1991, the Missouri Department of Health and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) detected TCE contamination in residential wells in the Villages of Silver Creek and Saginaw,

EDWARD S. SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge. This case arises out of a United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) antidumping administrative review of anti-friction bearing (“AFB”) sales. SKF GmbH is a, manufacturer and exporter of AFBs in Germany, and SKF USA, Inc. is a United States importer of German AFBs (collectively “SKF”). SKF appeals from two decisions of the United States Court of International Trade, which sustain

794 F.Supp.2d 1374 (2011) NSK CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, and FAG Italia S.p.A., et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Timken Company, Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 11-124. Court No. 06-00334. United States Court of International Trade. October 12, 2011. *1375 Crowell & Moring LLP (

774 F.Supp.2d 1300 (2011) NSK CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, and FAG Italia S.p.A., et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Timken Company, Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 11-54, Court No. 06-00334. United States Court of International Trade. May 13, 2011. *1301 Crowell & Moring LLP (Matth

774 F.Supp.2d 1296 (2011) NSK CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, and FAG Italia S.p.A., et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Timken Company, Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 11-43, Court No. 06-00334. United States Court of International Trade. April 20, 2011. Crowell & Moring LLP (Matthew P. Jaffe, Robert A. Lipstein, and Carr

744 F.Supp.2d 1359 (2010) NSK CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, and FAG Italia S.p.A., et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Timken Company, Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 10-133. Court No. 06-00334. United States Court of International Trade. December 9, 2010. *1360 Crowell & Moring LLP (

ORDER Timken Company submits a motion for a stay, pending appeal, of the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade. Upon consideration thereof, It Is Ordered That: NSK Corporation et al. and JTEKT Corporation et al. are directed to respond no later than May 27, 2011. The CIT’s judgment is temporarily stayed pending this court’s consideration of the papers sub

77 F.Supp.2d 1335 (1999) SKF USA INC. and SKF GmbH; FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG and FAG Bearings Corporation, Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Torrington Company, Defendant-Intervenor and Plaintiff, and NTN Bearing Corporation of America and NTN Kugellagerfabrik (Deutschland) GmbH; SNR Roulements, Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 99-127. Court No. 97-01-00054-S.<

712 F.Supp.2d 1356 (2010) NSK CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, and Fag Italia S.p.A., et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Timken Company, Defendant-Intervenor. Court No. 06-00334. Slip Op. 10-38. United States Court of International Trade. April 12, 2010. *1359 Crowell & Moring LLP (Mat

637 F.Supp.2d 1311 (2009) NSK CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, and FAG Italia SpA, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Timken Company, Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 09-91. Court No. 06-00334. United States Court of International Trade. August 31, 2009. *1314 Crowell & Moring LLP (Matth

LOURIE, DYK, PROST, MOORE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges, concurring in the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. We concur in the decision of the court not to rehear this case en banc. Contrary to the urgings of the dissenters from the denial of rehearing en banc, there is no legal justification for this court to adopt a rule requiring deference to the substantial evidence determinations of the Cou

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises out of the second sunset review of antidumping duty orders on ball bearings from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”). Defendants-Appellants the United States International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) and The Timken Company (“Timken”) (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal from the Court of International Trade’s final judgment affirming the Commi

ORDER LOURIE, Circuit Judge. FAG Italia, S.p.A., Schaeffler Group USA, Inc., Schaeffler KG, the Barden Corporation, and the Barden Corporation (U.K.) Ltd. submit a motion for an injunction, pending appeal, to prevent the liquidation of entries of ball bearings from Germany that were produced or exported by Schaeffler KG or Schaeffler Technologies GmbH & Co. KG (formerly Schaeffler KG) and entered for con

OPINION STANCEU, Judge: This case arose from the actions of two agencies, the U.S. International Trade Commission (the “ITC” or the “Commission”) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”), that denied plaintiffs Ethan Allen Global, Inc. and Ethan Allen Operations, Inc. (collectively, “Ethan Allen”) certain monetary benefits under

818 F.Supp.2d 1355 (2012) ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendants, and American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade, Kincaid Furniture Co., Inc., L. & J.G. Stickley, Inc., Sandberg Furniture Manufacturing Company, Inc., Stanley Furniture Company, Inc., T. Copeland and Sons, Inc., and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Company, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 12-14. Court

Slip Op. 12- 14 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendants, Before: Gregory W. Carman, Judge Timothy C. Stanceu, Judge and Leo M. Gordon, Judge