Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Schmid”
State v. Schmidpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Schmid, 2025-Ohio-14.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT GREENE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 2024-CA-16 : v.
Schmid v. Simmonspublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/27/2022 08:07 AM CDT - 48 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports SCHMID v. SIMMONS Cite as 311 Neb. 48 Lanny Schmid, an individual, appellee and
People v. Schmidpublic domain
People v Schmid (2020 NY Slip Op 07105) People v Schmid 2020 NY Slip Op 07105 Decided on November 25, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Schmid v. Simmonspublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/15/2022 12:08 AM CDT - 48 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports SCHMID v. SIMMONS Cite as 311 Neb. 48 Lanny Schmid, an individual, appellee and
Schmid v. McCauleypublic domain
I. Background Federal habeas review requires the Court to "presume that the state court's factual determinations are correct unless the petitioner rebuts the presumption by clear and convincing evidence." Perez-Gonzalez v. Lashbrook , 904 F.3d 557, 562 (7th Cir. 201
Matter of Schmidpublic domain
Per Curiam. Nuno Michel Schmid was admitted to practice by this Court in 1997 and lists a business address in London, England with the Office of Court Administration. Schmid now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the T
Schmid v. Town of Ausablepublic domain
Schmid v Town of Ausable (2025 NY Slip Op 04210) Schmid v Town of Ausable 2025 NY Slip Op 04210 Decided on July 17, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opi
Matter of Provost-Lutz v. Schmidpublic domain
Matter of Provost-Lutz v Schmid (2024 NY Slip Op 00708) Matter of Provost-Lutz v Schmid 2024 NY Slip Op 00708 Decided on February 9, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Jud
Schmid v. Schmidpublic domain
166 P.3d 1285 (2007) 2007 WY 148 Mike SCHMID, Appellant (Defendant), v. Pat SCHMID, Appellee (Plaintiff). Nos. 06-268, 06-270. Supreme Court of Wyoming. September 18, 2007. *1286 Representing Appellant: Clark D. Stith, Rock Springs, Wyoming. Representing Appellee: P. Richard Meyer and Robert N. Will
Schmid v. Knauerpublic domain
Appeal transferred, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, to the Appellate Division, Second Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (see NY Const, art VI, §§ 3 [b] [2]; 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]).
State v. Schmidpublic domain
OPINION ROSS, Judge. A game warden found Robert Schmid in a deer blind in a deer-hunting area during hunting season dressed in blaze orange clothing and armed with a shotgun loaded with deer slugs. Schmid appeals from his conviction of hunting deer without a license. He maintains that the deer-hunting statute, which prohibits “pursuing” game without a license, does not include his conduct because “pursuin
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 4, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D23-1757 Lower Tribunal No. 21-1020 Mt. Hawley Insurance Company, Appellant, vs. Schmid Construction, Inc., et al.
State of Minnesota v. Roger Benedict Schmidpublic domain
OPINION LILLEHAUG, Justice. A Department of Natural Resources officer encountered Roger Schmid sitting in a camouflaged ATV blind in an open field, wearing blaze orange, and possessing a loaded gun. Schmid was charged and convicted under Minn.Stat. § 97B.301 (2014), which states that a person may not “take” deer without a license. Schmid moved for a judg
Schmid v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Schmid)public domain
PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO CLAIM CATHERINE J. FURAY, Bankruptcy Judge. The Debtor and Plaintiff, Suzannah Meta Schmid (“Debtor”), filed an objection *741to Claim No. 2
Schmid v. Statepublic domain
13 So.3d 487 (2009) SCHMID v. STATE. No. 5D08-3775. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. July 14, 2009. Decision without published opinion Affirmed.
Anastazia Schmid v. Steve McCauleypublic domain
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Anastazia Schmid was convicted in Indiana of murdering her boyfriend. She testified that she had heard a voice telling her that she is the Messiah and that the boyfriend had to die because he had sexually abused her daughter. The jury found her guilty but mentally ill. This spared her any risk of capital punishment but did not avoid a long term in pri
Schmid v. Pastorpublic domain
216 P.3d 192 (2009) 2009 MT 280 352 Mont. 178 Scott W. SCHMID and Cindy L. Schmid, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Josef W. PASTOR, Patti E. Pastor, Monica Pastor, Lynn Thurlow and Tracy Holst, Defendants and Appellees. No. DA 08-0296. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs March 18, 2009. Decided August 25,
Schmid v. Schmidpublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM. Heinrich W. Schmid (Father) appeals from a Judgment Modifying Decree of Dissolution. Father contends the trial court erred (1) in ordering him to pay Donna K. Schmid (Mother) $900 per month, plus 82% of uncovered medical, hospitalization, and dental expenses because such an order was an abuse of discretion; (2) in entering an order of child support in the amount of $900 per month because
Schmid v. City & County of S.F.public domain
Filed 2/1/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR FREAR STEPHEN SCHMID et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A158861 v. (City & County of San Francisco CITY AND COUNTY OF Super. Ct. No. CGC-18-571283) SAN FRANCISCO et a
Schmid v. Bank of America, N.A.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. This case arises out of a bankruptcy petition filed by plaintiff Suzannah Meta Schmid under chapter 13 of the bankruptcy code. After defendants Bank of America, N.A. and Associated Bank, N.A. filed claims against the estate for approximately $40,000 and $30,000 respectively, plaintiff objected to the claims and filed an adversary proceeding in the bankru