⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Schmid”

State v. Schmidpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-01-03 · Published · cited 5× · 2025 Ohio 14
[Cite as State v. Schmid, 2025-Ohio-14.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT GREENE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 2024-CA-16 : v.
Schmid v. Simmonspublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022-03-04 · Published · cited 1× · 311 Neb. 48
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/27/2022 08:07 AM CDT - 48 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports SCHMID v. SIMMONS Cite as 311 Neb. 48 Lanny Schmid, an individual, appellee and
People v. Schmidpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-11-25 · Published · cited 0× · 188 A.D.3d 1268; 132 N.Y.S.3d 827; 2020 NY Slip Op 07105
People v Schmid (2020 NY Slip Op 07105) People v Schmid 2020 NY Slip Op 07105 Decided on November 25, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Schmid v. Simmonspublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022-03-04 · Published · cited 19× · 311 Neb. 48
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/15/2022 12:08 AM CDT - 48 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports SCHMID v. SIMMONS Cite as 311 Neb. 48 Lanny Schmid, an individual, appellee and
Schmid v. McCauleypublic domain
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019-05-15 · Published · cited 1× · 385 F. Supp. 3d 710
I. Background Federal habeas review requires the Court to "presume that the state court's factual determinations are correct unless the petitioner rebuts the presumption by clear and convincing evidence." Perez-Gonzalez v. Lashbrook , 904 F.3d 557, 562 (7th Cir. 201
Matter of Schmidpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-05-11 · Published · cited 0× · 2017 NY Slip Op 3841; 150 A.D.3d 1474; 51 N.Y.S.3d 907
Per Curiam. Nuno Michel Schmid was admitted to practice by this Court in 1997 and lists a business address in London, England with the Office of Court Administration. Schmid now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the T
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-07-17 · Published · cited 1× · 2025 NY Slip Op 04210
Schmid v Town of Ausable (2025 NY Slip Op 04210) Schmid v Town of Ausable 2025 NY Slip Op 04210 Decided on July 17, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 00708
Matter of Provost-Lutz v Schmid (2024 NY Slip Op 00708) Matter of Provost-Lutz v Schmid 2024 NY Slip Op 00708 Decided on February 9, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Jud
Schmid v. Schmidpublic domain
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2007-09-18 · Published · cited 5× · 2007 WY 148; 166 P.3d 1285; 2007 Wyo. LEXIS 160; 2007 WL 2703092
166 P.3d 1285 (2007) 2007 WY 148 Mike SCHMID, Appellant (Defendant), v. Pat SCHMID, Appellee (Plaintiff). Nos. 06-268, 06-270. Supreme Court of Wyoming. September 18, 2007. *1286 Representing Appellant: Clark D. Stith, Rock Springs, Wyoming. Representing Appellee: P. Richard Meyer and Robert N. Will
Schmid v. Knauerpublic domain
New York Court of Appeals · 2015-09-10 · Published · cited 0× · 26 N.Y.3d 954; 38 N.E.3d 815; 17 N.Y.S.3d 71; 2015 NY Slip Op 84012; 2015 N.Y. LEXIS 2594
Appeal transferred, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, to the Appellate Division, Second Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (see NY Const, art VI, §§ 3 [b] [2]; 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]).
State v. Schmidpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013-12-23 · Published · cited 0× · 840 N.W.2d 843; 2013 WL 6725751; 2013 Minn. App. LEXIS 114
OPINION ROSS, Judge. A game warden found Robert Schmid in a deer blind in a deer-hunting area during hunting season dressed in blaze orange clothing and armed with a shotgun loaded with deer slugs. Schmid appeals from his conviction of hunting deer without a license. He maintains that the deer-hunting statute, which prohibits “pursuing” game without a license, does not include his conduct because “pursuin
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024-12-04 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 4, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D23-1757 Lower Tribunal No. 21-1020 Mt. Hawley Insurance Company, Appellant, vs. Schmid Construction, Inc., et al.
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015-02-25 · Published · cited 23× · 859 N.W.2d 816; 2015 Minn. LEXIS 73
OPINION LILLEHAUG, Justice. A Department of Natural Resources officer encountered Roger Schmid sitting in a camouflaged ATV blind in an open field, wearing blaze orange, and possessing a loaded gun. Schmid was charged and convicted under Minn.Stat. § 97B.301 (2014), which states that a person may not “take” deer without a license. Schmid moved for a judg
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013-04-24 · Published · cited 10× · 494 B.R. 737
PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO CLAIM CATHERINE J. FURAY, Bankruptcy Judge. The Debtor and Plaintiff, Suzannah Meta Schmid (“Debtor”), filed an objection *741to Claim No. 2
Schmid v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009-07-14 · Published · cited 0× · 13 So. 3d 487; 2009 WL 2517034
13 So.3d 487 (2009) SCHMID v. STATE. No. 5D08-3775. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. July 14, 2009. Decision without published opinion Affirmed.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016-06-08 · Published · cited 30× · 825 F.3d 348; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10357; 2016 WL 3190670
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Anastazia Schmid was convicted in Indiana of murdering her boyfriend. She testified that she had heard a voice telling her that she is the Messiah and that the boyfriend had to die because he had sexually abused her daughter. The jury found her guilty but mentally ill. This spared her any risk of capital punishment but did not avoid a long term in pri
Schmid v. Pastorpublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2009-08-25 · Published · cited 6× · 2009 MT 280; 216 P.3d 192; 352 Mont. 178; 2009 Mont. LEXIS 423
216 P.3d 192 (2009) 2009 MT 280 352 Mont. 178 Scott W. SCHMID and Cindy L. Schmid, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Josef W. PASTOR, Patti E. Pastor, Monica Pastor, Lynn Thurlow and Tracy Holst, Defendants and Appellees. No. DA 08-0296. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs March 18, 2009. Decided August 25,
Schmid v. Schmidpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998-11-24 · Published · cited 0× · 987 S.W.2d 340; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2104; 1998 WL 810185
ORDER PER CURIAM. Heinrich W. Schmid (Father) appeals from a Judgment Modifying Decree of Dissolution. Father contends the trial court erred (1) in ordering him to pay Donna K. Schmid (Mother) $900 per month, plus 82% of uncovered medical, hospitalization, and dental expenses because such an order was an abuse of discretion; (2) in entering an order of child support in the amount of $900 per month because
California Court of Appeal · 2021-02-01 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 2/1/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR FREAR STEPHEN SCHMID et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A158861 v. (City & County of San Francisco CITY AND COUNTY OF Super. Ct. No. CGC-18-571283) SAN FRANCISCO et a
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013-08-27 · Published · cited 0× · 498 B.R. 221; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121369; 2013 WL 4525613
OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. This case arises out of a bankruptcy petition filed by plaintiff Suzannah Meta Schmid under chapter 13 of the bankruptcy code. After defendants Bank of America, N.A. and Associated Bank, N.A. filed claims against the estate for approximately $40,000 and $30,000 respectively, plaintiff objected to the claims and filed an adversary proceeding in the bankru