Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Schoenmann v. Fisher”
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ILLSTON, District Judge. On July 27, 2001, the Court heard argument on Trustee E. Lynn Schoenmann’s motions to dismiss two related actions. Having carefully considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion for the reasons set forth below. BACKGROUND These actions involve a dispute over
Opinion issued April 29, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00305-CV ——————————— 2017 YALE DEVELOPMENT LLC AND ALLEN J. FISHER, Appellants V. HOLTZAPPLE NEAL PROPERTIES GROUP LLC, Appell
Jackson v. Schoenmannpublic domain
This was an action for damages brought by appellant, J. C. Jackson, in the district court of Harris county against appellees, L. Schoenmann, W. P. McInereney, and Ed Blackman, as defendants. The defendants were alleged to be partners in the business of selling, delivering, and distributing beer. There was a sworn denial that the latter defendants were partners with Schoenmann in the beer business, but the question of partnership is not material to any issue presented on this appeal. Pl
Glean Tech Fund II LP v. Greg McIntoshpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GLEAN TECH FUND II LP, and GLEAN ) TECH II LLC - SERIES A-CL, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0032-PAF ) GREG MCINTOSH, KIMMY SCOTTI, ) RAHUL GANDHI, IRON MOUNTAIN ) INFORMATION MANAGEMENT LLC, ) IRON MOUNTAIN INC., EASTWARD ) FUND MANAGEMENT LLC, JAVIER ) VILLAMIZ
Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Quickpublic domain
I dissent in this case. The peremptory instruction requested by the appellant should have been granted by the court below. Stewart, the employee who drove the automobile negligently and caused the injury to Quick, had abandoned the master's business at the time of the injury, and was using the automobile in violation of his contract with the master. The automobile belonged to the master, and *Page 460 he was using it, not for any purpose of the mas
Malone v. Dawsonpublic domain
The defendants in error, doing business under the name of the Fidelity Products Company, brought this suit against the plaintiffs in error, doing business under the name of the Willis Gin Company, in the County Court of Harris County, to recover damages for an alleged breach of a contract of sale of one car of cottonseed. The facts pleaded and proven disclosed that on September 12, 1923, defendants in error agreed to purchase from plaintiffs in error a loaded car of cottonseed at $48 a