Cases

Opinion by JUDGE RICHMAN ¶ 1 In this construction defect case, Sopris Lodging, LLC, assignee of the claims of third-party plaintiffs TDC/BEI Joint Venture, LLC (TDC), Charles R. Lakin, and Tyler Casebier, appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of third-party defendants, Schofield Excavation, Inc. (Schofield), and Colorado Engineerin

The will of Mary A. Pitzer, which was probated on March 28, 1903, contained the following item, to-wit: "I give and devise to my nephew, Emmett Pitzer, for his use and benefit during his lifetime the following described real estate in Boone County, in the State of Indiana, to-wit: the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 18 North of Range 2 East, and at his death the same to descend to his surviving children." Emmett Pitzer, then a resident of Boone County, India

2024 IL App (4th) 220961 FILED January 9, 2024 NO. 4-22-0961 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate IN THE APPELLATE COURT Court, IL

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2022 WY 103 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2022 August 24, 2022 CITY OF RAWLINS, Appellant (Respondent), v. S-21-0278 STEPHANIE SCHOFIELD, Appellee (Petitioner).

32 So.3d 90 (2009) Leo SCHOFIELD, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D08-1641. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. August 28, 2009. *91 Richard G. Bartmon of Law Offices of Richard G. Bartmon, Boca Raton, for Appellant. FULMER, Judge. Leo Schofield Jr. appeals the summary denial of

PER CURIAM. Leo Schofield appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, in which he argued that he was entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.1 We write to address why we must affirm. In 1989, Schofield was convicted of first-degree murder for the death of his wife, Michelle, in Februa

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TED STEWART, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Maverik Country Store, Inc.’s (“Maverik”) Motion for Summary Judgment.1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendant’s Motion. I.

488 F.Supp.2d 1258 (2007) Melbert Ray FORD, Petitioner, v. Derrick SCHOFIELD, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent. Civil Action File No. 1:01-CV-2595-TWT. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. May 11, 2007. *1259 *1260

493 F.Supp.2d 1255 (2007) Carlton GARY, Petitioner, v. Derrick SCHOFIELD, Warden, Respondent. No. 4:97CV181 CDL. United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Columbus Division. May 30, 2007. *1256 John Richard Martin, Michael Kennedy McIntyre, Atlanta, GA, for Petitioner. ORDER LAND, District Judge.<

Originally enacted in 1872, Penal Code section 836 codified the common law rule which generally precluded a peace officer from making a warrantless arrest for a misdemeanor not committed in the officer's presence. At that time, of course, there were no automobiles and no "drunk drivers." Then, an inebriated person either riding a horse or driving a wagon, posed little danger to the public. Times have changed. Now, an inebriated person driving a motor

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: Timothy D. Carr, a Georgia prisoner convicted of murder and sentenced to death, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On appeal, Carr raises three claims: (1) the prosecution withheld the evidence of his co-defendants’ agreements in violation of Brady v. Maryland, <

BARKETT, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I will confess that the grisly facts of this case easily tempt one to merge Conklin’s killing of the victim with his acts upon the body after death. However, notwithstanding the atrocious desecration of the body,1 Conklin was entitled to a fair determination of whether he was guilty of murder or whether, as he claims, he killed George Crooks in

Carley, Chief Justice. After a jury trial, Appellant Sam Green was found guilty of the malice and felony murder of Candy Wright, a separate charge of aggravated assault against Ms. Wright, and the rape and aggravated assault of Leanna Ziel. The felony murder verdict was vacated by operation of law, and the charge of aggravated assault against Ms. Wright was merged into the malice murder count. The trial court entered judgmen

J^FITZSIMMONS, J. This appeal is concentrated on the issue of the applicability of a tax assessment on the portion of green coke burned up in a coke calcining process at Reynolds Metals Company (Reynolds). The trial court held that Reynolds was due a refund of the taxes that it had paid under protest to the City of Baton Rouge, East Baton Rouge Parish and East Baton Rouge Parish School Board (City Parish). This court affirms f

857 So.2d 304 (2003) Donald GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D01-3063. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. October 10, 2003. *305 Donald Green, pro se. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Timothy A. Freeland, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. <

33 S.W.3d 485 (2000) 343 Ark. 244 Willie GREEN v. STATE of Arkansas. No. CR 99-323. Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 14, 2000. *487 John Wesley Hall, Jr., Little Rock, for appellant. Mark Pryor, Att'y Gen., by: Mac Golden, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellee. LAVENSKI R. SMITH, Jus

PATTI B. SARIS, Chief Judge. I ADOPT the report and recommendation without opposition and DISMISS ARFA for lack of personal jurisdiction. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON ARFA’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT October 17, 2013. DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This action was brought

790 F.Supp.2d 947 (2011) GREEN VALLEY INVESTMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF WINNEBAGO, Defendant. Case No. 08-C-0706. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. May 16, 2011. As Amended July 15, 2011. *949 Jeff Scott Olson, Jeff Scott Olson Law Firm SC, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff. Barbara J. Zabawa,

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Schofield v White-Rodgers Div. ([appeal No. 1] 170 AD2d 952 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Boehm, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Den-man, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

668 F.Supp. 1126 (1987) Stephen M. KULA, Plaintiff, v. J.K. SCHOFIELD & CO., INC. and John K. Schofield, Defendants. No. 86 C 6471. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. July 17, 1987. *1127 *1128 John J. Moran, Rock, Fusco, Reynolds & Heneghan, John F. O'Meara, Chicago, Il