Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0077p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant. - UNITED STATES OF AME

412 F.Supp.2d 958 (2006) UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff, v. Robert WACHOWIAK, Jr. Defendant. No. 05-CR-22. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. February 3, 2006. *959 Brian E. Pawlak, United States Department of Justice, Office of the US Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff. Nancy Joseph, Federal Defender Se

OPINION GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. Oscar Flores was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The government appeals the district court’s imposition of a sentence of 100 months of incarceration in connection with Flores’s conviction. The government argues that the district court erred in concluding that Fl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Robert Thomas v. Civil No. 13-cv-259-LM Opinion No. 2022 DNH 042 P Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Berlin, New Hampshire ORDER Petitioner Robert Thomas is a federal prisoner currently incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institut

FUENTES, Circuit Judge The Eighth Amendment is an area of the law that is often fact-intensive and can require balancing the rights of incarcerated citizens with the administrative judgment of prison officials. This appeal, however, is straightforward. Former inmate Anthony Mammana raises a challenge under the Eighth Amendment to his confinement in a chilled room with constant lighting, no bedding, and only paper-like clothing. The

GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Rafael Rivera, pro se , brings this action against Defendants Federal Bureau of Prisons (the "BOP"), Tunesia Mitchell, and John Doe Medical Personnel 1-15 (the "John Doe Defendants") asserting claims stemming from medical treatment that he received while detained at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (the "MCC"). (See Am. Compl.) The action was referred t

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER Lawrence E. Kahn, U.S. District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Petitioner Jason James Clapper (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, in which he seeks prior custody credit for the period from September 8, 2011 to October 18, 2012. Dkt. Nos. 1 (“Petition”); 1-1 (“Exhibits”).1 Respondent oppo

CHIN, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Ellis Walker brought this action below pro se, alleging that the conditions of his confinement in the Federal Correctional Institution in Ray Brook, New York (“FCI Ray Brook”) amounted to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The United States District Court for the Northern District of New Y

DAVID N. HURD, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...272 II. BACKGROUND...274 *272III. LEGAL STANDARDS...274 A. Motions in Limine...274 B. Expert Testimony...275 IV. DISCUSSION...277 A. Plai

SPATT, District Judge: *318The Plaintiffs Gemma Samele ("Samele"), Selma Roher ("Roher"), And Salvatore Guadagna ("Guadagna") (the "Plaintiffs") commenced this putative class action against the Defendant Howard Zucker ("Zucker," or the "Commissioner"), as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health ("DOH"), alleging that the Defenda

20-2415 Walker v. Schult 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ------ 4 August Term, 2020 5 (Argued: May 25, 2021 Decided: August 16, 2022) 6 Docket No. 20-2415 7 _________________________________________________________ 8 ELLIS WALKER, 9

POOLER and WESLEY, Circuit Judges: On September 11, 2001, “19 Arab Muslim hijackers who counted themselves members in good standing of al Qaeda” hijacked four airplanes and killed over 3,000 people on American soil. Ashcroft v. Iqbal (Iqbal), 556 U.S. 662, 682, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009). This case raises a difficult and delicate set of legal issues concerning individuals who were caught up in the post-9/1

PER CURIAM: Donald Todd appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights suit on grounds of qualified immunity. We reverse and remand. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On September 30, 1993, Todd, a federal prisoner incarcerated in Texas, filed a complaint alleging violation of his civil rights by various Bureau of Pr

207 F.Supp.2d 581 (2002) Antonio MONTALVO, Plaintiff, v. George E. SNYDER, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 01-CV-420-KKC. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, London. May 28, 2002. Antonio Montalvo, Manchester, KY, pro se. Marianna Clay, U.S. Attorney's Office, Lexington, KY, for defendant. *582 MEMORANDU

WELBAUM, P.J. *920 {¶ 1} In this case, Defendant-Appellant, Tamara Remy ("Tamara"), appeals from her convictions and sentences on three counts of intimidation, three counts of domestic violence, three counts of endangering children, one count of complicity to rape, one count of rape, and thr

713 F.Supp.2d 194 (2010) Shon DUTTON, Petitioner, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Respondents. No. 08-CV-0874(VEB). United States District Court, W.D. New York. May 20, 2010. *196 Shon C. Dutton, Bradford, PA, pro se. Joel L. Violanti, U.S. Attorney's Office, Buffalo, NY, for Respondents. DECISION AND ORD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Ronald Blue West V. Case No. 13-cv-528-SM Opinion No. 2014 DNH 023 Deborah G. Schult, Warden, FCI Berlin O R D E R Before the court is Ronald Blue West's: complaint (doc. no. 1), motion to appoint counsel (doc. no. 3), motion to show exhaustion of administrative

13‐981 (L) Turkmen, et al. v. Hasty, et al. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 5 August Term, 2013 6 7 (Argued: May 1, 2014 Decided: June 17, 2015) 8

369 F.Supp. 1182 (1973) George McMILLAN, Plaintiff, v. Norman CARLSON, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 72-2551-M. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 31, 1973. *1183 Herman Schwartz, Amherst, N. Y., John Reinstein, Mass. Civil Liberties Union, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff. J

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The Plaintiff Mona T. Kanciper (the “Plaintiff’ or “Kanciper”) commenced this civil rights action on April 30, 2012, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, et seq. (“Section 1983”), as well as Article IV, Section 1 of the New York State Constitution and Section 30 of the New York State Executive Law, stemming from the execution of a search warrant on