Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Schultz v. American Battery Technology Company, Inc.”
In Re Teraforce Technology Corp.public domain
347 B.R. 838 (2006) In re TERAFORCE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and DNA Computing Solutions, Inc., Debtors. Nos. 05-38756-BJH-11, 05-83757-BJH-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. August 18, 2006. *839 *840 *841
Valente v. Textron, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge. Plaintiffs Matthew Valente and James Valente filed the instant products liability action in New York state court against Defendants Textron and the E-Z Go Division of Textron. Matthew Valente was seriously injured while operating a golf cart made by Defendants and alleges that Defendants are liable under a theory of strict liability, negli
Volterra Semiconductor Corp. v. Primarion, Inc.public domain
796 F.Supp.2d 1025 (2011) VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. PRIMARION, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. C-08-05129 JCS. United States District Court, N.D. California. May 4, 2011. *1035 Brian Joseph Keating, James W. Morando, Jeffrey M. Fisher, John L. Cooper, Racheal Turner, Farella Braun & Martel LLP, San
184 S.W.3d 840 (2006) SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS DIVISION, INC.; Springs Window Fashions, L.P.; and SWF, Inc. d/b/a SC-SWF, Inc., Appellants, v. The BLIND MAKER, INC., Appellee. No. 03-03-00376-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. January 20, 2006. Supplemental Opinion April 20, 2006. *850 Michael Diehl, Susman Go
MEMORANDUM OPINION T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge. This dispute between two competing providers of a specialized insurance service arises from a confidentiality and licensing agreement whereby one of the providers agreed to license its proprietary software for administering the service to the other provider. The agreement between the licensor and the licensee further provided that the licensor agree
30 F.Supp.2d 1182 (1998) MEDICAL LABORATORY MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS d/b/a Consultants Medical Lab, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. Civ 95-02494-PHX-ROS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. December 22, 1998 *1183 *1184
240 F.Supp.2d 465 (2002) STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. DARKPRINT IMAGING, INC., Defendant. No. 1:99-CV-00612. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. October 9, 2002. *469 William L. London, III, Sanford, NC, Jennifer Heisinger, Joseph C. Smith, Jr., Bartlit, Beck, Herman, Palenchar & Scott, Denver
Memorandum Opinion and Order LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge. In this breach of contract action, third-party Plaintiff NCS Power, Inc. (“NCS”) asserts that third-party Defendant Yoku Energy Technology Ltd. (“Yoku”) supplied nonconforming lithium-ion batteries to Plaintiff UTC Fire & Security Americas Corp., Inc. (“UTC”). Yoku now moves for summary judgment, arguing that this Court lacks
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
77 F.Supp.2d 514 (1999) LNP ENGINEERING PLASTICS, INC., and Kawasaki Chemical Holding Co., Inc., Plaintiffs, v. MILLER WASTE MILLS, INC., Trading as RTP Company, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 96-462-RRM. United States District Court, D. Delaware. December 17, 1999. *515 *516 Josy W. Ingersoll, and Joh
Hal Crews and Debra Leitch v. DkASI Corporation, Debra H. Holley, David Holley and ASI Gymnastics, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 05-14-00544-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 5/11/2015 10:04:41 AM
Philip Morris Inc. v. Angelettipublic domain
RAKER, Judge. Petitioners, a host of tobacco manufacturers and related entities, have filed a petition with this Court for a writ of mandamus or prohibition, asking that we direct the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to vacate its certification of two classes of Maryland residents who, as current or former users of tobacco products, have filed a suit against Petitioners claiming
264 Wis.2d 60 (2003) 2003 WI 108 665 N.W.2d 257 JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU, a mutual company (f/n/a Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin), Affiliated FM Insurance Company, AIU Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company (as successor to Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Company), American Employers' Insurance
FILED 15-0092 8/4/2015 3:59:31 PM tex-6352761 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
In re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ RENEWED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification (doc. 211), Teleetronies’ Memorandum in Opposition (doc. 271), Plaintiffs’ Reply (doc. 284) and Teleetronies’ Supplemental Memorandum (doc. 288). The Court held oral argument on the motion on February 3, 1997. The Co
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.* PER CURIAM: In United Steelworkers of America v. Marshall, 647 F.2d 1189 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 913, 101 S.Ct. 3148, 69 L.Ed.2d 997 (1981), this court affirmed most aspects of regulations promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) governing worker exposure to airborne lead
Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc.public domain
760 F.Supp. 1486 (1991) Lois ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. JACKSONVILLE SHIPYARDS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 86-927-Civ-J-12. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. January 18, 1991. Order, Injunction and Final Judgment March 8, 1991. *1487 *1488
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc.public domain
COFFEY, Circuit Judge. Since 1982 Johnson Controls, Inc. (hereinafter “Johnson Controls” or “Johnson”) has maintained a fetal protection policy designed to prevent unborn children and their mothers from suffering the adverse effects of lead exposure. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW (hereinafter “UAW”), several UAW local unions and a group of individual empl
Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.public domain
557 F.Supp. 739 (1983) ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY v. DAWSON CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., et al. C.A. No. 74-H-790. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. January 5, 1983. Nunc Pro Tunc Order January 5, 1983. *740 *741 *742
886 F.2d 871 50 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1627,51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,359, 58 USLW 2193,14 O.S.H. Cas.(BNA) 1217,1989 O.S.H.D. (CCH) P 28,673 INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE ANDAGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW, etal., Plaintiffs-Appellants,andLocal 322, Allied Industrial Workers of America, AFL-CIO,Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant,v.JOHNSON CONTROLS, IN