Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Scott Alan Ebert”
Commonwealth v. Failorpublic domain
770 A.2d 310 (2001) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Scott Alan FAILOR, Appellant. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Keith A. Blosser, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 6, 2000. Decided April 18, 2001. *311 Samuel William Milkes, Taylor Putney Andrews, Carlisle, for Scott Fai
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-12-0000538 02-OCT-2017 01:56 PM NO. SCMF-12-0000538 S
McManaway v. KBR, INC.public domain
695 F.Supp.2d 883 (2010) Mark McMANAWAY; David Rancourt; Brent Lasher; Jody Aistrop; William Earl Bickell; Matthew Dale Board; Larry Bunner; William DeLashmutt; Jeffrey Fromme; Jeffery Henke; Anthony Huff; Ben McIntyre; Jeffrey Alan Varner; Tommy J. Ebert, JR.; *884 Lucas Ray Whistle; Micah Partlow; Jurgen P. Turner, Jr.; Russell Kimberling; Scott Wyatt; Gary Fischl; Stephen Salamone; Russell Garvin; Daniel Kribs; Dav
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigationpublic domain
667 N.W.2d 405 (2003) In re SILICONE IMPLANT INSURANCE COVERAGE LITIGATION. Nos. C5-01-1546, C3-01-1738, C3-01-1741, C5-01-1742, C4-01-1747, C6-01-1748, C4-01-1778, C9-01-1811, C0-01-1812, C1-01-1821, C4-01-1828, C6-01-1829, C8-01-1850, C2-01-1861, C4-01-1862, C7-01-1869, C6-01-1894, CX-01-1896, C1-01-1897, C9-01-1906; C3-01-1917, C3-01-1920, C7-01-1922, C2-01-1925, C3-01-1965. Supreme Court of Minnesota.<
McManaway v. KBR, Inc.public domain
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TO ENTER A “LONE PINE” ORDER WILLIAM G. HUSSMANN, JR., United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Honorable William G. Hussmann, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, on Defendants’ Motion to Amend Case Management Plan to Enter a “Lone Pine” Order filed September 14, 2009. (Docket No. 105). Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to
Stevenson v. Lanhampublic domain
736 A.2d 363 (1999) 127 Md. App. 597 Warren R. STEVENSON v. Richard A. LANHAM, Sr. No. 445, Sept. Term, 1998. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 1, 1999. *365 Joseph B. Tetrault (David C. Wright on the brief), Chestertown, for appellant. Alan D. Eason, Assistant Attorney General (J. Jos
Northern States Power Co. v. City of Ashlandpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. From 1885.until 1947, a manufactured gas plant operated in Ashland, Wisconsin, on a bluff above Lake Superior, generating gas for heating and lighting. For that entire time, the. plant discharged tar wastes into the bluff. In 1987, plaintiff Northern States Power Company acquired the plant site and shortly thereafter discovered contamination. It notified
Hall v. Dillon Companies, Inc.public domain
189 P.3d 508 (2008) Ruthie M. HALL, Appellant, v. DILLON COMPANIES, INC., Appellee. No. 99,476. Supreme Court of Kansas. July 25, 2008. *510 Bruce Alan Brumley, of Topeka, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellant. Scott Mann, of Mann Law Offices, LLC, of Hutchinson, argued the cause and was on the brief for
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–1942 Filed May 12, 2017 LAURIE FREEMAN, SHARON MOCKMORE, BECCY BOYSEL, GARY D. BOYSEL, LINDA L. GOREHAM, GARY R. GOREHAM, KELCEY BRACKETT, and BOBBIE LYNN WEATHERMAN, Appellees, vs. GRAIN PROCESSING CORPORATION, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Muscatine County, Thomas G. Reidel, Judge. Defendant appeals district court ruling certifyi
MEMORANDUM CAROL E. JACKSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs Wilson Road Development Corporation (WRDC), Brenda Diimey, Daniel Dumey, and the Brenda Kay Du-mey and Daniel E. Dumey Revocable Living Trusts initiated this action on May 11, 2011, seeking monetary and declaratory relief under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§
Wolfe v. Clarkepublic domain
819 F.Supp.2d 538 (2011) Justin Michael WOLFE, Petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,[1] Respondent. Civil Action No. 2:05cv432. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. July 26, 2011. *543 James Griffin, Alan Dial, Brian Meiners, King & Spalding, Washin
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–1942 Filed May 12, 2017 Amended July 13, 2017 LAURIE FREEMAN, SHARON MOCKMORE, BECCY BOYSEL, GARY D. BOYSEL, LINDA L. GOREHAM, GARY R. GOREHAM, KELCEY BRACKETT, and BOBBIE LYNN WEATHERMAN, Appellees, vs. GRAIN PROCESSING CORPORATION, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Muscatine County, Thomas G. Reidel, Judge. Defe
G0llehon Farming v. United Statespublic domain
207 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2000) G0LLEHON FARMING, GOLLEHON GRAIN CO., GREG P. ALZHEIMER, JIM ANDERSON, LARRY F. ARENDT, ARMSTRONG FARMS, BAR TRIANGLE J RANCH, B.M. (BUD) BEASTROM, JAMES BEASTROM, CECIL BENJAMIN, DELLAS BENTZ, CARTER BERG, ET AL, DENNIS BERTSCH, HERMAN BERTSCH, ROGER BERTSCH, MYRNA BERTSCH, RANDY BERTSCH, PIUS BLACK, ARLO BODIN, SIDNEY BOE, ALBERT L. BOECKEL, GAYLEN E. BRANDT, GILBERT BRAUN, ERVIN BREN, BUDAK FARMS, BART BURDICK, JER
Dueck v. Clifton Club Co.public domain
[Cite as Dueck v. Clifton Club Co., 2017-Ohio-7161.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 103868 and 103888 ARTHUR P. DUECK, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS
Gollehon Farming v. United Statespublic domain
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants Gollehon Farming and 347 other farmers and grain elevator companies (hereinafter “Gollehon Farming”) appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Montana dismissing their monetary, declaratory, and class action claims against the United States based on alleged mis-measurement of the protein content of wheat inspected by the Federal Grain Inspecti
Salem Financial, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Tax Refund Suit; STARS Structured Transaction Between BB & T Bank and Bar-clays Bank; Availability of Foreign Tax Credits From Payment of United Kingdom Taxes; Deductions for Interest and Transaction Costs; Economic Substance Doctrine Applied to Trust and Loan Components of Transaction; Assessment of Penalties. OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. In this tax refund case, t
Tavernetti v. Superior Courtpublic domain
22 Cal.3d 187 (1978) 583 P.2d 737 148 Cal. Rptr. 883 THOMAS FREDRICK TAVERNETTI et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. L.A. 30895. Supreme Court of California. September 22, 1978. *188 COUNSEL
Romer v. Evanspublic domain
517 U.S. 620 (1996) ROMER, GOVERNOR OF COLORADO, et al. v. EVANS et al. No. 94-1039. United States Supreme Court. Argued October 10, 1995. Decided May 20, 1996. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO *621 Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breye