⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Scott Alan Ebert”

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001-04-18 · Published · cited 31× · 770 A.2d 310; 564 Pa. 642; 2001 Pa. LEXIS 800
770 A.2d 310 (2001) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Scott Alan FAILOR, Appellant. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Keith A. Blosser, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 6, 2000. Decided April 18, 2001. *311 Samuel William Milkes, Taylor Putney Andrews, Carlisle, for Scott Fai
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017-10-04 · Published · cited 0×
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-12-0000538 02-OCT-2017 01:56 PM NO. SCMF-12-0000538 S
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2010-02-25 · Published · cited 3× · 695 F. Supp. 2d 883; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17185; 2010 WL 724599
695 F.Supp.2d 883 (2010) Mark McMANAWAY; David Rancourt; Brent Lasher; Jody Aistrop; William Earl Bickell; Matthew Dale Board; Larry Bunner; William DeLashmutt; Jeffrey Fromme; Jeffery Henke; Anthony Huff; Ben McIntyre; Jeffrey Alan Varner; Tommy J. Ebert, JR.; *884 Lucas Ray Whistle; Micah Partlow; Jurgen P. Turner, Jr.; Russell Kimberling; Scott Wyatt; Gary Fischl; Stephen Salamone; Russell Garvin; Daniel Kribs; Dav
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003-08-21 · Published · cited 48× · 667 N.W.2d 405; 2003 Minn. LEXIS 511
667 N.W.2d 405 (2003) In re SILICONE IMPLANT INSURANCE COVERAGE LITIGATION. Nos. C5-01-1546, C3-01-1738, C3-01-1741, C5-01-1742, C4-01-1747, C6-01-1748, C4-01-1778, C9-01-1811, C0-01-1812, C1-01-1821, C4-01-1828, C6-01-1829, C8-01-1850, C2-01-1861, C4-01-1862, C7-01-1869, C6-01-1894, CX-01-1896, C1-01-1897, C9-01-1906; C3-01-1917, C3-01-1920, C7-01-1922, C2-01-1925, C3-01-1965. Supreme Court of Minnesota.<
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2009-11-20 · Published · cited 1× · 265 F.R.D. 384; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109069; 2009 WL 4061581
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TO ENTER A “LONE PINE” ORDER WILLIAM G. HUSSMANN, JR., United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Honorable William G. Hussmann, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, on Defendants’ Motion to Amend Case Management Plan to Enter a “Lone Pine” Order filed September 14, 2009. (Docket No. 105). Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to
Stevenson v. Lanhampublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999-09-01 · Published · cited 13× · 736 A.2d 363; 127 Md. App. 597; 1999 Md. App. LEXIS 140
736 A.2d 363 (1999) 127 Md. App. 597 Warren R. STEVENSON v. Richard A. LANHAM, Sr. No. 445, Sept. Term, 1998. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 1, 1999. *365 Joseph B. Tetrault (David C. Wright on the brief), Chestertown, for appellant. Alan D. Eason, Assistant Attorney General (J. Jos
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2015-09-11 · Published · cited 1× · 131 F. Supp. 3d 802; 81 ERC (BNA) 1811; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121145; 2015 WL 5330275
OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. From 1885.until 1947, a manufactured gas plant operated in Ashland, Wisconsin, on a bluff above Lake Superior, generating gas for heating and lighting. For that entire time, the. plant discharged tar wastes into the bluff. In 1987, plaintiff Northern States Power Company acquired the plant site and shortly thereafter discovered contamination. It notified
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008-07-25 · Published · cited 7× · 189 P.3d 508; 286 Kan. 777; 2008 Kan. LEXIS 395
189 P.3d 508 (2008) Ruthie M. HALL, Appellant, v. DILLON COMPANIES, INC., Appellee. No. 99,476. Supreme Court of Kansas. July 25, 2008. *510 Bruce Alan Brumley, of Topeka, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellant. Scott Mann, of Mann Law Offices, LLC, of Hutchinson, argued the cause and was on the brief for
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-05-12 · Published · cited 3× · 895 N.W.2d 105; 47 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20071; 2017 WL 1967416; 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 48
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–1942 Filed May 12, 2017 LAURIE FREEMAN, SHARON MOCKMORE, BECCY BOYSEL, GARY D. BOYSEL, LINDA L. GOREHAM, GARY R. GOREHAM, KELCEY BRACKETT, and BOBBIE LYNN WEATHERMAN, Appellees, vs. GRAIN PROCESSING CORPORATION, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Muscatine County, Thomas G. Reidel, Judge. Defendant appeals district court ruling certifyi
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016-09-16 · Published · cited 1× · 209 F. Supp. 3d 1093; 83 ERC (BNA) 1233; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126237; 2016 WL 4944082
MEMORANDUM CAROL E. JACKSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs Wilson Road Development Corporation (WRDC), Brenda Diimey, Daniel Dumey, and the Brenda Kay Du-mey and Daniel E. Dumey Revocable Living Trusts initiated this action on May 11, 2011, seeking monetary and declaratory relief under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§
Wolfe v. Clarkepublic domain
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011-07-26 · Published · cited 7× · 819 F. Supp. 2d 538; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91447; 2011 WL 3251494
819 F.Supp.2d 538 (2011) Justin Michael WOLFE, Petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,[1] Respondent. Civil Action No. 2:05cv432. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. July 26, 2011. *543 James Griffin, Alan Dial, Brian Meiners, King & Spalding, Washin
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-05-12 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–1942 Filed May 12, 2017 Amended July 13, 2017 LAURIE FREEMAN, SHARON MOCKMORE, BECCY BOYSEL, GARY D. BOYSEL, LINDA L. GOREHAM, GARY R. GOREHAM, KELCEY BRACKETT, and BOBBIE LYNN WEATHERMAN, Appellees, vs. GRAIN PROCESSING CORPORATION, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Muscatine County, Thomas G. Reidel, Judge. Defe
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000-03-27 · Published · cited 14× · 207 F.3d 1373; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 5140
207 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2000) G0LLEHON FARMING, GOLLEHON GRAIN CO., GREG P. ALZHEIMER, JIM ANDERSON, LARRY F. ARENDT, ARMSTRONG FARMS, BAR TRIANGLE J RANCH, B.M. (BUD) BEASTROM, JAMES BEASTROM, CECIL BENJAMIN, DELLAS BENTZ, CARTER BERG, ET AL, DENNIS BERTSCH, HERMAN BERTSCH, ROGER BERTSCH, MYRNA BERTSCH, RANDY BERTSCH, PIUS BLACK, ARLO BODIN, SIDNEY BOE, ALBERT L. BOECKEL, GAYLEN E. BRANDT, GILBERT BRAUN, ERVIN BREN, BUDAK FARMS, BART BURDICK, JER
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-08-10 · Published · cited 14× · 2017 Ohio 7161; 95 N.E.3d 1032
[Cite as Dueck v. Clifton Club Co., 2017-Ohio-7161.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 103868 and 103888 ARTHUR P. DUECK, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 207 F.3d 1373; 2000 WL 310255
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants Gollehon Farming and 347 other farmers and grain elevator companies (hereinafter “Gollehon Farming”) appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Montana dismissing their monetary, declaratory, and class action claims against the United States based on alleged mis-measurement of the protein content of wheat inspected by the Federal Grain Inspecti
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013-09-20 · Published · cited 3× · 112 Fed. Cl. 543; 112 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6168; 2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1372; 2013 WL 5298078
Tax Refund Suit; STARS Structured Transaction Between BB & T Bank and Bar-clays Bank; Availability of Foreign Tax Credits From Payment of United Kingdom Taxes; Deductions for Interest and Transaction Costs; Economic Substance Doctrine Applied to Trust and Loan Components of Transaction; Assessment of Penalties. OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. In this tax refund case, t
California Supreme Court · 1978-09-22 · Published · cited 44× · 583 P.2d 737; 22 Cal. 3d 187; 148 Cal. Rptr. 883; 1978 Cal. LEXIS 284
22 Cal.3d 187 (1978) 583 P.2d 737 148 Cal. Rptr. 883 THOMAS FREDRICK TAVERNETTI et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. L.A. 30895. Supreme Court of California. September 22, 1978. *188 COUNSEL
Romer v. Evanspublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1996-06-03 · Published · cited 1433× · 134 L. Ed. 2d 855; 116 S. Ct. 1620; 517 U.S. 620; 1996 U.S. LEXIS 3245
517 U.S. 620 (1996) ROMER, GOVERNOR OF COLORADO, et al. v. EVANS et al. No. 94-1039. United States Supreme Court. Argued October 10, 1995. Decided May 20, 1996. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO *621 Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breye