Cases

Justice WILLETT delivered the opinion of the Court. Texas, cellphone users help fund the State’s 911 emergency networks via two distinct “e911 fee” statutes. The first, enacted in 1997, imposes on wireless subscribers a $0.50/month “emergency service fee” 1 collected on the customer’s bill. The seco

17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN

618 F.Supp. 1534 (1985) In re SCOTT COUNTY MASTER DOCKET. Greg MYERS and Jane Myers, individually and as parents and natural guardians of Andy Myers, Amy Myers and Brian Myers, minors, Plaintiffs, v. SCOTT COUNTY and R. Kathleen Morris, Scott County Attorney, Scott County Human Services, and Peg Subby, its Director of Human Services, Thomas Price, and Phipps-Yonas & Price, P.A., Paul Thomsen, Guardian Ad Litem, Doris Wilker Social Worker,

672 F.Supp. 1152 (1987) In re SCOTT COUNTY MASTER DOCKET. Greg MYERS and Jane Myers, individually and as parents and natural guardians of Andy Myers, Amy Myers and Brian Myers, minors, Plaintiffs, v. SCOTT COUNTY and R. Kathleen Morris, Scott County Attorney, Scott County Welfare Department, and Peg Subby, its Director of Human Services, Thomas Price, and Phipps-Yonas & Price, P.A., Paul Thomsen, Guardian ad Litem, Doris Wilker Social Wor

ROWE, J. The Florida Education Association, the Florida Congress of Parents and Teachers, Inc., the League of Women Voters of Florida, Inc., the Florida State Conference of Branches of the NAACP, a group of parents, of children in public schools, teachers employed by public schools, and religious and community leaders (collectively, Appellants) argue that the Florida Tax Credit

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX 22-APR-2021 12:06 PM Dk

Even Rushton's comment that Nunes needed to consult her attorneys about whether she was "guilty of harassment" does not assert that Nunes committed criminal acts. Rushton posted the following on Nunes's public Facebook account: Ask your attorneys if in your quest to investigate and have people rally around you if you are guilty of harassment. I think the answer is yes. My LDS mom and grandmother have seen all the posts today and do

349 F.Supp.2d 566 (2004) Carmen VELAZQUEZ, Wep Workers Together!, Community Service Society of New York, Inc., New York City Coalition to End Lead Poisoning, Centro Independiente de Trabajadores Agricolas, Inc., and Greater New York Labor-Religion Coalition, on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, organizations and their members; namely, individuals and organizations *567 who are, or wish to be, represented b

JOHN J. MCCONNELL, JR., United States District Judge. This is an action for review of the decision ("Decision")1 of a due process hearing *375officer ("Hearing Officer") under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,

CORRIGAN, J., Concurring. I concur fully in the judgment affirming the Court of Appeal’s decision. I write separately to set out an alternative ground for distinguishing the “political structure” cases, particularly Washington v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1 (1982) 458 U.S. 457 [73 L.Ed.2d 896, 102 S.Ct. 3187] (Seattle), where the high court gave its broadest explanation of that equal protection doctri

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1281 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1282 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NO

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER [Resolving ECF Nos. 167, 168] PEARSON, JUDGE. Defendants Jordie Callahan and Jessica Hunt (hereafter “Defendants”) jointly submit to the Court a motion for judgment of acquittal and a motion for new trial. The Government filed a brief in opposition, to which Defendants filed a reply. The Court has reviewed and considered the parties’ briefs, the law, and the trial

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. TERRY HUBBARD, Appellee. No. 4D2022-3429 [July 17, 2024] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; George Odom, Judge

618 F.Supp.2d 24 (2009) Mohammed Abdullah Taha MATTAN, et al., Petitioners, v. Barack OBAMA, et al., Respondents. Civil Action No. 09-745 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 21, 2009. *25 Gordon Samuel Woodward, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP, Washington, DC, Rebecca Y. Starr, William T. Hangl

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 617–622 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 18, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

VICTORY, J. I,We granted this writ application to resolve a split in the courts of appeal regarding whether the fourth category of the doctrine of contra non valentem, i.e., the discovery rule, is applicable to suspend prescription of a conversion claim against a payor under La. R.S. 10:3^120(f). After reviewing the record and the applicable law, we find that the discovery rule cannot suspend the one-year prescriptive

SHARON G. LEE, J., dissenting. The maxim, “every man’s house is his castle,” is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence. Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 390, 34 S.Ct. 341, 58 L.Ed. 652 (1914). It applies whether the house is a castle or a cottage—a mansion or a mobile home.1 The right to retreat into the privacy of one’s home and be free from governmental intrusion is a basic

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0335p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ RHONDA HEHRER, personal representative of the Estate │ of Joseph Hehrer, │

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ