Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Scott Garner”
Tina Dawn Garner v. Scott Whitney Garnerpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 20, 2016 TINA DAWN GARNER v. SCOTT WHITNEY GARNER Appeal from the General Sessions Court for Hardin County No. 8763 Daniel L. Smith, Judge ___________________________________ No. W2016-01213-COA-T10B-CV – Filed August 10, 2016 _________________
Garner v. Premopublic domain
HADLOCK, C. J. Petitioner was convicted of two counts of aggravated murder and sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. On direct appeal, we reversed the conviction on one of those counts and remanded for entry of a corrected judgment reflecting a conviction on a single count of aggravated murder. State v. Garner, 194 Or App 268, 279, 94 P3d 163, rev den, 337 Or 616 (2004) (Garner
State v. Garnerpublic domain
Per Curiam: Mr. Thomas E. Garner appeals from his conviction by a Jackson County jury for driving while intoxicated. § 577.010, RSMo (2010 Supp.). The circuit court sentenced him, as a persistent offender, to thirty days of shock time, which he served, and to four years in the Department of Corrections, but suspended execution of sentence and placed him on probation for three years subject to certain conditions. For reasons stated
Mike Garner v. Brent Scottpublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-09-00018-CV
State v. Garnerpublic domain
94 P.3d 163 (2004) 194 Or.App. 268 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Anthony Scott GARNER, Appellant. 981296, 981307; A116412 (Control), A116413. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted May 26, 2004. Decided July 21, 2004. *164 Eric M. Cumfer, Senior Deputy Public Defender, argued t
Scott v. Scottpublic domain
GARRETT, J. 11 Reginald Scott appeals from a city court eviction judgment rendered in favor of his former wife. For the reasons given below, we reverse and vacate the city court judgment because the city court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute. *461FACTS Reginald and Angela Scott, a married couple, bought a hous
Marilyn Garner v. Knoll, Incorporatedpublic domain
WIENER, Circuit Judge: This adversary action was brought by Appellant Marilyn D. Garner (the “Trustee”) against Appellee Knoll, Incorporated (“Knoll”). Specifically, the Trustee seeks to avoid transfers from Tusa Office Solutions, Incorporated (“Tusa Office”), the debtor, to Knoll, its creditor, as preferences under § 547 of the Bankruptcy Code. Facts &
State v. Garnerpublic domain
47 So.3d 584 (2010) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee v. Brian GARNER, Appellant. No. 45,474-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. August 18, 2010. *585 W. Jarred Franklin, Louisiana Appellate Project, for Appellant. Charles R. Scott, II, District Attorney, Tommy J. Johnson, Laura Owen Wingate Fulco, Jacob P. Brouss
Garner v. Scottpublic domain
59 F.3d 1242 Garnerv.Scott* NO. 94-50347 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 21, 1995 Appeal From: W.D.Tex., No. W-93-CV-429 1 AFFIRMED.
Garner v. Statepublic domain
The appellant, Franklin Garner, was convicted of first-degree sodomy, a violation of § 13A-6-63(a)(3), Ala. Code 1975. The trial court sentenced him, as a habitual offender, to serve a term of life in prison. See § 13A-5-9(b)(3), Ala. Code 1975. It also imposed an additional ten-year period of post-conviction supervision pursuant to § 13A-5-6(c), Ala. Code 1975. The appell
Garner v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Co.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER OF PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, alleging violations of Plaintiff Jennifer Garner’s (“Garner’s”) rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1992 (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-54, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-13, as amended by the ADA Amendments Act
Hopper v. Garnerpublic domain
944 S.W.2d 540 (1997) 328 Ark. 516 Paul E. HOPPER, Appellant, v. Tom GARNER, Appellee. No. 96-1423. Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 12, 1997. *541 Paul E. Hopper, Little Rock, for Appellant. J. Scott Davidson, Batesville, Tom Garner, Glencoe, for Appellee. IMBER, Justice. This appeal in
Tavakolian v. Scottpublic domain
652 S.E.2d 542 (2007) TAVAKOLIAN v. SCOTT et al. No. S07A0703. Supreme Court of Georgia. October 29, 2007. Gholamreza Tavakolian, Avondale Estate, pro se. Stephen Earl Whitted, Dekalb County Law Department, John E. Robinson, Mclarty, Robinson & Van Voorhies, LLP, Decatur, James W. Garner, Garner & Still, Lawrenceville, for Appellee. BENHAM, Jus
Garner v. Louisiana Housingpublic domain
1DAVID S. GORBATY, Judge. In this appeal, Louisiana Housing contends that the trial court erred in rescinding the sale of a mobile home bought by the plaintiffs, returning to them the purchase price, and awarding them an additional $29,333.50 in damages, plus legal interest, costs, and attorney’s fees. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On
State v. Garnerpublic domain
976 S.W.2d 57 (1998) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Santino J. GARNER, Appellant. No. WD 53839. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. September 15, 1998. *58 Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Alana M. Barragan-Scott, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson
State v. Garnerpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Garner, 2025-Ohio-2570.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2025-L-075 Plaintiff-Appellee, Civil Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas SHURMALE LAMAR GARNER,
Alston v. Garner's Cleaning Servicepublic domain
*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Amy L. Pfeiffer and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commi
State Dept. of Revenue v. Garnerpublic domain
The State Department of Revenue ("the Department") appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Marion County in favor of R.L. Garner and Saundria Pate Garner ("the Garners"). In its judgment, the circuit court concluded that the Garners' appeal to the circuit court from an adverse decision of the Department's administrative law judge ("ALJ") was proper; that court reversed the ALJ's decision, holding that the Garners were entitled to a deduction from their 1998 Alabama income tax
Jackson v. Garnerpublic domain
The blood test ordered by the Commission showed that Bobby Fitzgerald Holland was the biological child of decedent/employee. No question has been raised as to its authenticity. Consequently, it is ORDERED that the report of this test, dated May 2, 1994 is admitted into the record. By letter to the Commission dated June 7, 1994, in light of the results of the blood tests performed pursuant to the Commission's order entered March 17, 1994, the appellant-widow conceded the paternity and
Scott v. Statepublic domain
995 S.W.2d 325 (1999) Glen Reed SCOTT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 01-98-00161-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). July 1, 1999. Danny K. Easterling, Easterling & Easterling, P.C., Houston, for Appellant. Calvin Hartmann, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, John B. Holmes, Dist. Atty. of Harris County, Houston, for State. <