Cases

OPINION McKEAGUE, District Judge. This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence rendered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. Defendant was charged in a seven-count indictment with conspiracy to transport stolen firearms and ammunition in interstate commerce, possession of stolen firearms and ammunition, and possessi

OPINION RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. A federal grand jury indicted George Bryant, Crystal Keel, Scottie Magouirk, and Richard Whited on ten counts relating to the manufacture and use of methamphetamine. Following a jury trial in Bryant’s case and guilty pleas in the cases of Keel, Magouirk, and Whited, the district court imposed sentences of 100, 188,

OPINION RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. A federal grand jury indicted George Bryant, Crystal Keel, Scottie Magouirk, and Richard Whited on ten counts relating *297 to the manufacture and use of methamphetamine. Following a jury trial in Bryant’s case and guilty pleas in th

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-KA-00317-SCT DAVID MILTON SILLS a/k/a DAVID SILLS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/03/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES T. KITCHENS, JR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: PAYTREEN KEYUM DAVIDSON BENJAMIN RUSH, JR. FORREST ALLGOOD

GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Mareellette Reynolds, as the personal representative of the estate of her deceased son Stephen Neal, appeals from an adverse jury verdict in a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The key issue on appeal is whether the district court erred in refusing the request of Reynolds’s counsel to correct an erroneous jury instruction in response to questions by the jury after deliberations had begun.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0267p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ VULENZO L. BLOUNT, JR., │

585 F.3d 923 (2009) Gary Van JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Betty MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 00-3350. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: December 6, 2007. Decided and Filed: November 4, 2009. *926 ARGUED: Timothy F. Sweeney, Law Office of Timothy Farrell Sweeney, Cleveland,

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0007p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appe

741 F.Supp. 353 (1990) UNITED STATES of America v. MAIN STREET DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Steven Pesce, Mark Benowitz, Arthur Eisenman, Robert Cavaliere, and Stuart Podolsky, Defendants. No. 88 CR 0261. United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 26, 1990. *354 Andrew J. Maloney, U.S. Atty., E.D. N.Y., Cheryl L. Pollak, Asst. U.S

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 06a0429p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITE

184 F.3d 589 (6th Cir. 1999) MARCELLETTE REYNOLDS, AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN NEAL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,v.HARRY GREEN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, DETROIT WOODWARD CORRECTIONS CENTER, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. No. 98-1128 U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Argued: June 11, 1999Decided: July 26, 1999

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE COMPLAINT [DKT. 189] VANESSA L. BRYANT, District Judge. I. Introduction The Plaintiffs, Debra Miller (“Miller”), Brittany DiCarolis (“DiCarolis”), Hope Kelm (“Kelm”), Jennie H.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0384p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - GARY VAN JOHNSON,

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

In January, 1914, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company operated a regular passenger train between Aiken, in Cecil County, Maryland, a station on its Philadelphia branch, and Baltimore City. According to the schedule the train left Aiken for Baltimore at 6.45 o'clock in the morning, and returning in the evening, left Baltimore at 6.10 o'clock and arrived at Aiken at 7.40 P.M., where it remained over night. Sewell Station, a station between Aiken and Baltimore, was a run of about twenty-seve

Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court- In January, 1914, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company operated a regular passenger train between Aiken, in Cecil County, Maryland, a station on its Philadelphia branch, and Baltimore City. According to the schedule the train left Aiken for Baltimore at 6.45 o’clock in the morning, and returning in the evening, left Baltimore at 6.10 o’clock and arrived at Aike