Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Scruggs v. Bryson”
Monsanto Co. v. Scruggspublic domain
ON PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL MAYER, Circuit Judge. ORDER Mitchell Scruggs et al. (Scruggs) petition for permission to appeal an order certified by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi as one involving controlling issues of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and for which an immediate appeal may m
Monsanto Co. v. Scruggspublic domain
ON PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL MAYER, Circuit Judge. ORDER Mitchell Scruggs et al. (Scruggs) petition for permission to appeal an order certified by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi as one involving controlling issues of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and for which an immediate appeal may m
Monsanto Company v. Scruggspublic domain
459 F.3d 1328 MONSANTO COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Mitchell SCRUGGS, Eddie Scruggs, Scruggs Farm & Supplies, LLC, Scruggs Farm Joint Venture, HES Farms, Inc., MES Farms, Inc., and MHS Farms, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 04-1532, 05-1120, 04-1121. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. August 16, 2006. COPYRIG
Bryson v. Statepublic domain
327 So.2d 919 (1976) In re Jesse William BRYSON v. STATE of Alabama. Ex parte Jesse William Bryson. SC 1611. Supreme Court of Alabama. February 27, 1976. Scruggs, Rains & Wilson, Fort Payne, for petitioner. Writ Denied. BLOODWORTH, Justice. Petition of Jesse William Bryson for Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and rev
Head v. Scruggspublic domain
Atkinson, J. 1. “A purchase by a husband at a sale had by his wife as administratrix is voidable at the election of heirs of the intestate, who move within a reasonable time after the sale to set the same aside.” Lowery v. Idleson, 117 Ga. 778 (2) (45 S. E. 51); Broadhurst v. Hill, 137 Ga. 833 (3) (74 S. E. 422); DeVaughn v. Griffith, 149 Ga. 697 (10
Iadanza v. Harperpublic domain
611 S.E.2d 217 (2005) Carol IADANZA, Plaintiff v. Robert N. HARPER Jr., MD. and Digestive Diseases Diagnostic Center, P.A., Defendants. Robert N. Harper Jr., MD., Counter Claimant v. Carol Iadanza and Anthony J. Iadanza, Counter Defendants. No. COA04-801. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 19, 2005. Kuniholm Law Firm, by Elizabeth F. Kuniholm, Luc
Adams v. M.A. Hanna Co.public domain
603 S.E.2d 402 (2004) Carl ADAMS, Doyle Woodrow Alexander, Audrey Louise Allison, Albert William Arrington, Jr., James Ronnie Arrington, Judith Hope Arrington, Hoyt Jay Barnes, Sammy Barnett, Tommy Barnette, Roger Dean Beasley, Carroll Beck, Glenn Ray Beck, James Arthur Beck, Thurman Blaine, Trudie Marie Blaine, James Bolden, Terry Lee Browning, Grady Dallas Bryson, Mack C. Bryson, Verlin Leo Bryson, Gordon J. Buchanan, Harold Dempsey Buchanan, Nancy Buc
Pernix Ir. Pain Dac v. Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd.public domain
WILLIAM C. BRYSON, UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE *572BACKGROUND This is a Hatch-Waxman Act case. The plaintiffs, Pernix Ireland Pain DAC and Pernix Therapeutics, LLC, (collectively, "Pernix") have sued the defendant, Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd. ("Alvogen") for patent infringement under
Rueter v. Commercepublic domain
Case: 21-2216 Document: 44 Page: 1 Filed: 04/03/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JASON W. RUETER, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Respondent ______________________ 2021-2216 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems
Monsanto Co. v. Bowmanpublic domain
LINN, Circuit Judge. This case presents the court with another question of patent infringement by farmers planting the progeny of genetically altered seeds covered by U.S. patents. Here, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Monsanto Company and Monsanto Technology LLC (collectively “Monsanto”), sued Defendant-Appellant, Vernon Hugh Bowman (“Bowman”), in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana alleging infringe
Monsanto Co. v. Bowmanpublic domain
657 F.3d 1341 (2011) MONSANTO COMPANY and Monsanto Technology LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Vernon Hugh BOWMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2010-1068. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. September 21, 2011. *1342 Paul R.Q. Wolfson, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Washington, DC, for plaintiffs-appellees. W
497 F.3d 1293 (2007) BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC. (formerly known as Scimed Life Systems, Inc.), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC. (also known as Medtronic AVE, Inc.), Defendant-Appellee, and Eric C. Martin, Defendant. No. 2006-1434. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. August 8, 2007. *1294 Grego
Organic Seed Growers and Trade v. Monsanto Companypublic domain
DYK, Circuit Judge. Appellants, a coalition of farmers, seed sellers, and agricultural organizations, sought declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity with respect to twenty-three patents owned by Monsanto Co. and Monsanto Technology, LLC (collectively, “Monsanto”). The district court concluded that there was no justiciable case or controversy and dismissed for
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA24-263 Filed 19 November 2024 Wake County, No. 22CVS4566-910 MICHAEL HUGHES, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES TEACHERS’ AND STATE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, a North Carolina body politic and corporate; TEACHERS’ AND STATE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NORTH CAROLINA; CONSOLIDATED JUDICIAL RETIREMEN
Cochran v. City of Atlantapublic domain
Leigh Martin May, United States District Judge This case comes before the Court on Defendants City of Atlanta, Georgia, and Mayor Kasim Reed's Motion for Summary Judgment [105] and Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [107].1 This matter concerns whether the City could fire the Fire Chief of the Atlanta Fire and Rescue Department ("AFRD") for publishing a book to be used as a religious guide f
Cochran v. City of Atlantapublic domain
ORDER LEIGH MARTIN MAY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case comes before the Court on Defendants City of Atlanta, Georgia, and Mayor Kasim Reed’s Motion to Dismiss [11]. Following a review of the record, a hearing on the matter, and due consideration, the-Court enters the following Order. - I. Factual Background The facts relied upon in th
People v. Churchpublic domain
778 N.E.2d 251 (2002) 334 Ill. App.3d 607 268 Ill.Dec. 265 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy CHURCH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 3-01-0148. Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District. October 2, 2002. *252 Kerry J. Bryson (argued), Office of the State
Luther v. Statepublic domain
The indictment charged Phillip Luther with second degree arson in the burning of Wilson's Discount Store, the property of Betty and Eugene Wilson. Defendant was convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary for four years. The state's evidence discloses that Wilson's Discount Store, in Boaz, and a drug store owned by defendant were situated about 150 feet apart with an alley way running behind both stores. The testimony of state's witness Eddie Scott was substantially as f
Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc.public domain
ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Crocs, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims V-XII [Docket No. 227] and. Scott Seamans’ Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims VI-IX [Docket No. 231], The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. I. BACKGROUND1 A. Procedural Background
Lee v. Metropolitan Government of Nashvillepublic domain
596 F.Supp.2d 1101 (2009) Bud LEE and Cindy Lundman, as next friend and as natural parents of Patrick Lee, deceased, Plaintiffs, v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:06-0108. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. January 26, 2009. *1106 Joseph Paul