⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Searles v. Board of Ed”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2011-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 179 L. Ed. 2d 296; 2011 U.S. LEXIS 1349; 131 S. Ct. 1552; 562 U.S. 1213; 79 U.S.L.W. 3475
Motion to direct the Clerk to file petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-04-07 · Published · cited 0× · 538 U.S. 963; 123 S. Ct. 1753; 71 U.S.L.W. 3639; 155 L. Ed. 2d 516; 2003 U.S. LEXIS 2776
538 U.S. 963 SEARLESv.TOWN OF WEST HARTFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION. No. 02-8866. Supreme Court of United States. April 7, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT. 2 Ap
California Court of Appeal · 2021-01-22 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 1/22/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN QUEEN SEARLES, B296011 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 18PDRO01062) v. MICHAEL ARCHANGEL, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angel
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006-12-20 · Published · cited 1× · 861 N.E.2d 210; 308 Ill. Dec. 145; 369 Ill. App. 3d 500
861 N.E.2d 210 (2006) 308 Ill.Dec. 145 Queen A. Tiye SEARLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF CHICAGO, Arne Duncan, as Chief Executive Officer of the Board, Ruth Moscovitch, Individually and as General Counsel of the Board, Sunil Kumar, Individually and in his official capacity as Assistant General Counsel, John Franz, Individually and as Chief Labor Relations Officer of the Board, Ascencion J
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006-12-20 · Published · cited 0×
THIRD DIVISION December 20, 2006 No. 1-05-3471 QUEEN A. TIYE SEARLES, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Cook County.
California Court of Appeal · 2008-02-26 · Published · cited 22× · 72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 857; 160 Cal. App. 4th 514; 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 282
72 Cal.Rptr.3d 857 (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 514 SEARLES VALLEY MINERALS OPERATIONS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Defendant and Respondent. No. D049905. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division One. February 26, 2008. *858 Winston & Strawn, Charl
Searles v. Pompiliopublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2009-07-23 · Published · cited 2× · 652 F. Supp. 2d 432; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64725; 2009 WL 2222607
652 F.Supp.2d 432 (2009) Daniel SEARLES, Plaintiff, v. Frank POMPILIO and City of Beacon, Defendants. No. 02 Civ. 6567 (PGG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 23, 2009. *434 Russell A. Schindler, Russell A. Schindler, Kingston, NY, for Plaintiff. James A. Randazzo, Gelardi & Randazzo LLP, Rye Brooke, N
Searles v. Dechantpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004-12-28 · Published · cited 16× · 393 F.3d 1126; 60 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 594; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26978; 2004 WL 2988528
MARTEN, District Judge. Jimmy Searles appeals from the district court’s orders granting summary judgment for the defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint, and denying his motion for reconsideration of the order of summary judgment. ** We dismiss his appeal from the summary judgment order for lack of j
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005-08-05 · Published · cited 45× · 878 A.2d 509; 2005 ME 94; 2005 Me. LEXIS 101
LEVY, J. [¶ 1] This case arises from Ronald and Debra Searles’s purchase of a home from Schiavi Homes, LLC, that was manufactured by Fleetwood Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc. After experiencing a series of problems with the home, including the growth of extensive mold, the Searleses filed a complaint seeking damages. Following a jury trial, the Superior Court (York County, Brennan, J.) entered a judgment awarding money da
Conway v. Searlespublic domain
District Court, D. Vermont · 1997-01-29 · Published · cited 3× · 954 F. Supp. 756; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1169; 1997 WL 49986
954 F.Supp. 756 (1997) William H. CONWAY, Jr. and Gordon B. MacArthur, Plaintiffs, v. Brian SEARLES, State of Vermont Commissioner of Personnel, and State of Vermont, Defendants. No. 5:94-CV-309. United States District Court, D. Vermont. January 29, 1997. *757 *758
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997-06-06 · Published · cited 105× · 695 A.2d 1206; 1997 Me. LEXIS 137
695 A.2d 1206 (1997) Paul SEARLES v. TRUSTEES OF ST. JOSEPH'S COLLEGE, et al. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued December 3, 1996. Decided June 6, 1997. *1208 Paul F. Macri (orally) Berman & Simmons, P.A., Lewiston, Ronald J. Cullenberg Farmington, for plaintiff. Stephen C. Whiting (orally) Douglas, Whiting, Denha
District Court, D. Kansas · 1998-01-07 · Published · cited 4× · 993 F. Supp. 1350; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1678; 1998 WL 58875
993 F.Supp. 1350 (1998) Jimmy SEARLES, Plaintiff, v. Durward A. VAN BEBBER, et al., Defendants. No. 96-3515-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. January 7, 1998. *1351 Jimmy Searles, Hutchinson, KS, pro se. Hsing Kan Chiang, Office of Attorney General, Topeka, KS, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORD
District Court, S.D. New York · 2000-05-24 · Published · cited 30× · 98 F. Supp. 2d 456; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7108; 2000 WL 679892
98 F.Supp.2d 456 (2000) David SEARLES, Plaintiff, v. FIRST FORTIS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 99 CIV. 3535 (LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 24, 2000. *457 Evan S. Schwartz, Quadrino & Schwartz, P.C., for Plaintiff. Randi F. Knepper, Del Mauro, DiGiaimo & Knepper, P.C., New York Cit
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024-03-27 · Published · cited 12× · 97 F.4th 120
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 23-3166 PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES; LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA; PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD; COMMON CAUSE PENNSYLVANIA; BLACK POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT PROJECT; MAKE THE ROAD PENNSYLVANIA; BARRY M. SEASTEAD; MARLENE G. GUTIERREZ; AYNNE MARGARET PLEBAN POLINSKI; JOEL BENCAN; L
California Court of Appeal · 2019-10-15 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 9/23/19; Certified for publication 10/15/19 (order attached) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOLOMON ODUYALE, D073755 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. ECU09627) CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY,
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-10-31 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 24-8024 Document: 167 Date Filed: 10/31/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 31, 2025
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993-07-12 · Published · cited 28× · 998 F.2d 728; 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5275; 119 A.L.R. Fed. 633; 93 Daily Journal DAR 8892; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 17163; 1993 WL 248766
TANG, Circuit Judge: Greg Searles, a resident of Arizona, brought an action in the Central District of California against Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”), which has its principal place of business in Cincinnati, Ohio. Searles alleged that Cincinnati breached its insurance contract when it failed and refused in bad faith to indemnify Searles for damages and costs of d
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2016-06-30 · Published · cited 5× · 2016 COA 104; 409 P.3d 516; 2016 Colo. App. LEXIS 918
Opinion by JUDGE DUNN ¶ 1 Unhappy that the roads in their subdivision have fallen into disrepair, property owners in unincorporated Boulder County (collectively, the Owners) filed an action to force the Boulder County Board of County Commissioners (the County) to maintain their subdivision- roads.- We conclude the Owners do not have standing to bring their clai
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2016-04-07 · Published · cited 1× · 237 W. Va. 77; 785 S.E.2d 627; 2016 WL 1397301; 2016 W. Va. LEXIS 204
LOUGHRY, Justice: The petitioner, J.F. Allen Corporation (“J.F. Allen”), appeals a January 5, 2015, order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County dismissing, with prejudice, its breach of contract claim against the respondent, the Sanitary Board of the City of Charleston, West Virginia (“CSB”), pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure. In this appea
District Court, D. Colorado · 2012-12-12 · Published · cited 0× · 916 F. Supp. 2d 1191
ORDER LEWIS T. BABCOCK, District Judge. This matter is before me on the following motions filed by Defendant Board of County Commissioners of Elbert County (the “BOCC”): (1) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Claims of Kenneth G. Rohrbach, Karen L. Rohrbach, Paul K. Rohrbach, and Compost Express, Inc. (the “Rohrbaehs”) [Doc #81]; and (2) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Claims of Onyx