⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Seattle Children's Hospital v. United States Department of Justice”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-12-29 · Published · cited 49× · 76 F. Supp. 3d 224; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177644; 2014 WL 7373218
MEMORANDUM OPINION EMMET G. SULLIVAN, United States District Judge Medicaid is a federal program that helps to cover the costs of providing medical care to certain individuals. Some hospitals treat significantly higher percentages of Medicaid-eligible patients than others. Because Medicaid does not generally provide the same level of reimbur
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-06-01 · Published · cited 0× · 315 F. Supp. 3d 322
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge On December 29, 2014, the Court granted a motion for a preliminary injunction brought by plaintiffs Texas Children's Hospital ("Texas Children's") and Seattle Children's Hospital ("Seattle Children's")(collectively "plaintiffs"). See Order, Dec. 29, 2014, ECF No. 19. The Court's Order enjoined the Secretary of Health and Human Services ("the Secretary"), the Centers for Medica
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-06-01 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ________________________________ ) TEXAS CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL and ) SEATTLE CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civ. Action No. 14-2060 (EGS) ) ALEX AZAR, Secretary, ) United States Department o
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026-08-14 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT QUEERDOC, PLLC, No. 25-7384 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:25-mc-00042- JNW v. DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OPINION Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States D
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017-06-20 · Published · cited 0× · 258 F. Supp. 3d 672
OPINION AND ORDER •REBECCA BEACH SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE This matter comes before the court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Emergency In-junctive .Relief (“Motion”), ECF No. 7, and accompanying Memorandum in Support. ECF No. 8. The Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the Defendants’ enforcement of FAQ 33, which would reduce a statutory payment adjustment to hospitals, like the Plaintiff, that serve a disproportionate share ■
Alaska Supreme Court · 2023-05-16 · Published · cited 4× · 529 P.3d 523
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the Pacific Reporter. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA TARYN M., ) ) Supreme Court No. S-18509 Appellant,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-03-01 · Published · cited 74× · 61 F.4th 674
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DONNITTA SINCLAIR, mother of No. 21-35975 deceased Horace Lorenzo Anderson, Jr., individually, D.C. No. 2:21-cv- 00571-JCC Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OPINION CITY OF SEATTLE, a Municipality, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District C
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-03-06 · Published · cited 6× · 300 F. Supp. 3d 190
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge Medicaid is a federal program that helps to cover the costs of providing medical care to qualified individuals. Some hospitals treat significantly higher percentages of Medicaid-eligible patients than others. Because Medicaid does not generally provide the same level of reimbursement as other types of insurance coverage, such hospitals are often at a financial disadvantage. To rectify
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020-08-04 · Published · cited 0×
19-3591, 19-3595 New York v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Make the Road New York v. Cuccinelli UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2019 Argued: March 2, 2020 Decided: August 4, 2020 Docket Nos. 19-3591, 19-3595 STATE OF N
Alaska Supreme Court · 2008-05-09 · Published · cited 42× · 182 P.3d 1110; 2008 Alas. LEXIS 64; 2008 WL 1990657
182 P.3d 1110 (2008) TESSA M., Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES, OFFICE OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Appellee. No. S-12802. Supreme Court of Alaska. May 9, 2008. *1111 Robert R. Polley, Kodiak, for Appellant. Megan R. Webb, Assistant Attorney General, Anchorage, and Talis J. Colberg, Att
District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-01-31 · Published · cited 1× · 841 F. Supp. 2d 349
MEMORANDUM OPINION EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge. Plaintiff Sierra Club brought this action alleging that the Department of Agriculture’s Rural Utilities Service (“RUS”) and certain officials in the Department of Agriculture (collectively, “the federal defendants”) violated the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”) by failin
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-08 · Published · cited 231× · 599 U.S. 166
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 599 U. S. Part 1 Pages 166–235 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 8, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-05-23 · Published · cited 86× · 43 F. Supp. 3d 28; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70894; 2014 WL 2171089
Re Document Nos.: 3, 24, 25, 26 29, 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for an Injunction; Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and Disposing of all Other Pending Motions in this Case RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Orp
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-01-28 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-14-00802-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 1/28/2015 6:59:36 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK EXHIBIT A Page 367 grades, and engaged in athletic activities. 544 S.W.2d 367 (Tex. 1976)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-02-24 · Published · cited 5× · 129 F.4th 636
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10312 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:18-cr-00258- v. EJD-1 ELIZABETH A. HOLMES, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10338 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C.
Washington Supreme Court · 2013-05-09 · Published · cited 0×
/ Fl LE IN CLERKS OFFICE llJIREME COURT, STAlE Of WASIIIG1al : 01TE....MAY 0 9 201~ -yl'1....,.~ 'JUSTICE CHIEF c ·ct'. ~· IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDENT ACTION COUNCIL, ) ) Respondent, ) No. 87656-8 ) v. )
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982-12-30 · Published · cited 39× · 552 F. Supp. 1352; 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16375
552 F.Supp. 1352 (1982) Robert G. PONTIUS, M.D., Plaintiff, v. CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, a Pennsylvania Non-Profit corporation, and Henry T. Bahnson, M.D., Lenox D. Baker, M.D., Thomas K. Oliver, Jr., M.D., James R. Zuberbuhler, M.D., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 78-987. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. December 30, 1982. *1353
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011-08-12 · Published · cited 33× · 648 F.3d 1235; 53 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1649; 108 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5728; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16806; 2011 WL 3519178
MARCUS, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part1: Today this Court strikes down as unconstitutional a central piece of a comprehen*1329sive economic regulatory scheme enacted by Congress. The majority concludes that Congress does not have the commerce power to require un