Cases

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: This consolidated admiralty appeal requires us to determine the qualifications for trustee status under the Ship Mortgage Act (“Act”), 46 U.S.C. §§ 911-984. Initially, we must decide whether we have jurisdiction over the appeal brought by Pacific Fishermen, Inc. FACTS Appellants Ballard Oil Company, Inc. (“Ballard”), the Boatyard, Inc. (“Boatyard”), Lun

772 F.2d 565 1986 A.M.C. 1296 SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, Trustee, a national bankingassociation, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.BLUEWATER PARTNERSHIP, et al., Defendants,andPacific Fishermen, Inc., a Washington corporation,Defendant-Appellant.SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, Trustee, a national bankingassociation, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.BLUEWATER PARTNERSHIP, et al., Defendants,andBalla

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

Justice QUINN dissenting: I dissent. Although the United States Supreme Court in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2481, 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990), held that a state’s use of a highway sobriety checkpoint program does not violate the Search and Seizure Clause of the United States Constitution, I would affirm the suppression ruling in this case on the basis that the Search and

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2009-1372, 2009-1380, 2009-1416, 2009-1417 ______________________ Appeals from the Unite

Justice Thomas, concurring. Today, the Court holds that state entities may not experiment with race-based means to achieve ends they deem socially desirable. I wholly concur in The Chief Justice’s opinion. I write separately to address several of the contentions in Justice Breyer’s dissent (hereinafter dissent). Contrary to the dissent’s arguments, resegregation is not occurring in Seattle or Louisville; the

506 F.3d 315 (2007) Frederick E. BOUCHAT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BON-TON DEPARTMENT STORES, INCORPORATED; Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of Maryland, Incorporated; Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of Annapolis, Incorporated; Burlington Coat Factory of Gaithersburg, Incorporated; Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Of Security, Incorporated; Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of Baltimore, Incorporated; Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of R

305 S.W.3d 698 (2009) ROWAN COMPANIES, INC., Appellant, v. WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, Not in Its Individual Capacity but Solely as Owner Trustee of the Rowan-Halifax Jack-Up Rig, Textron Financial Corporation, North Sea Investments, Inc., and North Sea (Connecticut) LP, Appellees. No. 14-07-00465-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). October 8, 2009.

88 F.Supp.2d 116 (1999) John D.R. LEONARD, Plaintiff, v. PEPSICO, INC., Defendant. Nos. 96 Civ. 5320(KMW), 96 Civ. 9069(KMW). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 5, 1999. *117 OPINION & ORDER KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge. Plaintiff brought this action seeking, among other things, spec

247 F.Supp.2d 1171 (2003) CAESARS WORLD, INC. and Park Place Entertainment Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Cyrus MILANIAN and the New Las Vegas Development Company, LLC, Defendants. No. CV-S-02-1287-RLH RJJ. United States District Court, D. Nevada. February 19, 2003. *1174 Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, by Stephen W. Feingold, Ric

926 F.Supp. 321 (1995) STATE of New York, Plaintiff, v. KRAFT GENERAL FOODS, INC., Nabisco Cereals, Inc., Nabisco, Inc., Philip Morris Companies Inc., RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp., and RJR Nabisco Inc., Defendants. No. 93 Civ. 0811(KMW). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 22, 1995. *322

ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

76 B.R. 328 (1987) In re McLEAN INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 86 B 12238-41. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. July 29, 1987. Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy by Alan W. Kornberg, Stephen Shimshak, Robert Drain, New York City, for debtors-in-possession. Weil, Gotshal & Manges by Corinne Ball, Jacqueline Taubes, New York City, Mc

REED, District Judge. The plaintiffs, claiming to be tenants in common with defendants in certain mining claims, by this action are seeking to impose a trust on the proceeds of the sale by defendants of the whole of the common property proportionate to their claim of interest in such property. The facts in the case in some respects are similar to those involved in the case of Donohoe and Smith against the defendants, decided by t

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE