Cases

DONALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Motions to Dismiss filed by the following Defendants: Barry M. Kornfeld, Ferne E. Kornfeld, First Financial Tax Group, Inc., and FEK Enterprises (the "Kornfeld *1330Defendants") (DE 41); Albert D. Klager, Michele Klager, and Atlantic Insurance & Fi

ORDER: (1)AMENDING THE COURT’S APRIL 3, 2015, ORDER; (2)GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE SEC’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ITS FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF; (3)DENYING AS MOOT THE SEC’S AMENDED MOTION; (4)DENYING AS MOOT THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR RESCHEDULING OF HEARING DATES AND MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE; (5)VACATING HEARING DAT

MOORE, Circuit Judge: I. In May, 1965, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) instituted private administrative proceedings against the broker-dealer firm of Richard Bruce & Co. (Bruce & Co.) and six individuals associated with the firm in connection with transactions in the stock of

MOORE, Circuit Judge. Aaron Fink, petitioner, was employed as a registered representative for the broker-dealer firm of Richard Bruce & Company (Bruce & Co.) from June 1960 to November 1962. During the first part of 1962, Bruce & Co. served as managing underwriter for a Regulation A

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with much of the majority opinion but am constrained to dissent. In my view the Commission’s Order must be vacated for three reasons: I. The Commission’s justification of its switch in classification of broadband from a Title I inf

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

388 A.2d 887 (1978) Allen R. HONIG, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Respondent, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. (3M), Intervenor. No. 11344. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued June 21, 1977. Decided June 30, 1978. David R. Taxin, Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Ted P. Gerarden, Asst. Corp.

373 F.3d 372 PROMETHEUS RADIO PROJECTv.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; United States of America Prometheus Radio Project, Media General, Inc., National Association of Broadcasters, Network Affiliated Stations Alliance, ABC Television Affiliates Association, CBS Television Affiliates Association and NBC Television Affiliates, Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. and Fox Television Stations, Inc., Viacom Inc., National Broadcasting Company, Inc.,

Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-24-2004 Prometheus Radio v. FCC Precedential or Non-Pr

497 U.S. 547 (1990) METRO BROADCASTING, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL. No. 89-453. Supreme Court of the United States. Argued March 28, 1990. Decided June 27, 1990.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT *551 Gregory H. Guillot

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA. MIKVA, Circuit Judge: These two cases present challenges to the refusal of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”) to conduct investigations or hold evidentiary hearings on appellants’ complaints that two licensees violated the FCC’s Equal Employment Opportunity (“EEO”) rules, 47 C.F.R. § 73.2080 (1987), before granting television l

WALD, Chief Judge, dissenting: Congress, governmental agencies, and federal courts have struggled for nearly two decades to define the constitutional limits on affirmative efforts to improve access of minority groups to the mainstream of American life. This case involves a unique type of governmental access program not heretofore passed on by the Supreme Court. The majority’s invalidation of the Commission’s ten-y

870 F.2d 704 49 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 536,49 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,934, 276 U.S.App.D.C. 290 TALLAHASSEE BRANCH OF THE NAACP and the National Black MediaCoalition, Appellants,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee,Holt-Robinson Television, Inc., Intervenor.LOUISIANA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF THE NAACP, et al.,Appellants,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee,Lou

231 F.2d 725 97 U.S.App.D.C. 391 WJIV-TV, Inc., Appellant,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee, WSAV, Inc., Intervenor. No. 12598. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Oct. 10, 1955.Decided Jan. 12, 1956. Mr. Philip M. Baker, Washington, D.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MITCHELL WINE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:21-cv-03349 (TNM) DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Mitchell Wine’s Motion for a New Trial, see Pl.’s Mot., ECF No.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2330 ___________________________ Lee Michael Pederson Petitioner v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Respondent ___________________________ No. 24-2526 ___________________________ John Amster; Robert Heath Petitioners

Opinion of the Court by CUÉLLAR, J. *56 *200 When convicted sex offenders have a diagnosed mental disorder making it likely they would engage in sexually violent behavior if released, they are sub

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge. Plaintiff John Delaney brings suit against Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America Merrill Lynch f/k/a Banc of America Securities, LLC (collectively, “Bank of America” or “BoA”), alleging that BoA (1) violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621, by terminating him; and (2) breached an oral agree

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS BARBARA BATES AND LARRY BATES’ MOTION FOR DISMISSAL AND SANCTIONS JON P. McCALLA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants First American Monetary Consultants, Inc. (“FAMC”), Information Radio Network, Inc. (“IRN”), Charles Larry B