Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “Securities and Exchange Commission v. Traffic Monsoon”
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DENYING THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SET ASIDE THE RECEIVERSHIP Jill N. Parrish, United States District Court Judge Two related motions are before the court. First, the SEC has moved for a preliminary injunction that continues the receivership and asset freeze put into place by the TRO entered by the court. Second, defendants Traffic Mons
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sabrdaranpublic domain
ORDER RE POST-TRIAL AND REMEDY MOTIONS Re: Dkt. Nos. 170, 175 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) charge that Defendants Sasan Sabrdaran and Farhang Afsarpour engaged in insider trading in violation of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Following a three-week trial, the jury returned a verd
SEC. & Exch. Comm'n v. Scovillepublic domain
BRISCOE, J., concurring. I concur in the judgment. I agree with the majority that AdPacks are "securities" within the meaning of the 1933 and 1934 securities acts, Maj. Op. 1219-22, that Scoville did not adequately preserve the personal liability issue, id. at 1225 n.11, and that the SEC is likely
U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Ahmedpublic domain
Janet Bond Arterton, U.S.D.J. I. Introduction...636 II. Background...637 A. Overarching Facts...637 B. Procedural History...638 C. Defendant's Assertion of his Fifth Amendment Right...638 D. Defendant's Fraudulent Conduct...638 1. Company A ...638 2. Company B ...639