Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) SECURITIES AND ) EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Civil Action No. 23-1599 (ABJ) ) BINANCE HOLDINGS

*227 MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge When the Securities and Exchange Commission devises a settlement-distribution plan, a court does not consult a looking glass and ask whether it is the fairest of them all. The only question is whether such a pl

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1843 SOPHIA ZHOU, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Appellant, NICHOLAS LUONGO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; YICHUN XIE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; GREGORY HATHAWAY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; OSCA

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NEW START HOLDINGS, LLC., ) including protected series 22 6th ) Series and 804 Marshall Series and ) CHENXI LI, ) ) Plaintiffs/Counterclaim ) Defendants, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0831-MTZ ) ZI JUN ZHOU, and MARVIN ) DANIELS, as Truste

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RONALD A. GUZMÁN, District Judge. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) sued Yonghui “Harry” Zhang, All Know Holdings, Ltd., Sha Chen, and Zhi Yao (collectively, “Defendants”), among others, for insider trading in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. Defendan

274 F.Supp.2d 379 (2003) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. SOLUCORP INDUSTRIES LTD., Joseph S. Kemprowski, Peter R. Mantia, James G. Spartz, Robert Kuhn, Victor Herman, Arle Pierro, W. Bryan Fair and Glenn R. Ohlhauser, Defendants. No. 99 CIV. 11965(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 25, 2003. *381</

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS' DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Two petitions by the Federal Energy Commission (“FERC”) seeking affirmance *688of two of its orders assessing civil penalties have been pending before me. One petition (Case No. 13-cv-13056) seeks affirmance of a civil penalty against Lincoln Paper

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Defendants Joe Y. Zhou (“Zhou”) and Garrett Bland (“Bland”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss the claims against them in the complaint filed on March 29, 2011 (the “Complaint”) by plaintiff Vivine H. Wang (“Wang” or the “Plaintiff”). Upon

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE SINO CLEAN ENERGY, INC., No. 17-15316 Debtor. D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01781- SINO CLEAN ENERGY, INC., acting by JAD and through BAOWEN REN, PENG ZHOU, WENJIE ZHANG, ZHIXIN JING, and PAUL CHUI; and HUIQIN CHEN, OPINION LI HAN, GUANGJON HUANG, XIAODONG JIANG,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PIETRO CAMPANELLA, Individually ) and on Behalf of All Others Similarly ) Situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-1013-LWW ) S. KENT ROCKWELL, JOHN ) HARTNER, JOHN IRVIN, GREGORY F. ) PASHKE, WILLIAM F. STROME, ) ROGER W.

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs allege an epic Wall Street conspiracy. They charge that the nation’s leading underwriting firms entered into illegal contracts with purchasers of securities distributed in initial public offerings (“IPOs”). Through these contracts and by other illegal means, the underwriting firms allegedly executed a series of manipulations that grossly inflated the price of the securities after the IPOs in t

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs-appellants Jeffrey Klein and Samuel Ayoub (the “Investors”) appeal an August 6, 2015 judgment of .the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered after it dismissed the Investors’ claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The Investors do not appeal the merits of that Rule 12(b)(6) determination: They contend principally that the district court abused i

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1508 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DANA A. PULLMAN, Defendant, Appellant. No. 23-1510 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ANNE M. LYNCH,

MEMORANDUM & ORDER VITALIANO, D.J. Li Rong Gao commenced this action in 2010, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and New York Labor Law (“NYLL”). Presently before the Court is Gao’s motion for leave to file a stipulation of voluntary dismissal, terminating all claims against defendant Feng Lin with prejudice. (Pl’s Mot., ECF No. 332). Ml parties have consented to this partial

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-10553 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:10-cr-00121- RLH-RJJ-1 BRETT DEPUE, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from th

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1705 STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OHIO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Appellant, SHARAN COLEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.; JAMES C. FO

Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge Table of Contents I. Introduction...423 II. Factual Background...425 A. Case Background...425 B. Prior Opinion on FACEA...425 C. Religion and Commerce...426 III. Law...428 A. Timeliness of Constitutional Challenge...428

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2309 Doc: 38 Filed: 07/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 21 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2309 SAN ANTONIO FIRE & POLICE PENSION FUND; EL PASO FIREMEN & POLICEMEN’S PENSION FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 23, 2026 Decided July 7, 2026 No. 24-3013 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. ANDRE DE MOYA, APPELLANT Consolidated with 24-3030, 24-3031 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of