Cases

460 N.W.2d 363 (1990) Lisa Kay McDONNELL, Petitioner, Respondent, v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellant. Cindy Jean MOSER, Petitioner, Respondent, v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellant. Troy Eugene WEEDING, Petitioner, Respondent, v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellant. STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Keith Arnold DRIVER, Respondent. STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Michael Josep

Penn Athletic Club Building, Girard Trust Company, Trustee for First Mortgage Bondholders, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, RespondentPenn Athletic Club Bldg. v. CommissionerDocket No. 9007United States Tax Cou

MEIERHENRY, Retired Justice. [¶ 1.] When our state founders laid the cornerstone for our state capítol building in 1908, the distinguished leader and Dakota Territorial Superintendent of Public Instruction, Gen. W.H.H. Beadle, addressed the crowd. He spoke of the importance of education to the future of the state: The advance of every free state depends upon the broad intelligence of its citizens. B

OPINION BAKER, Judge. Appellant-plaintiff Louisville & Indiana Railroad Company (Railroad) appeals the entry of summary judgment for appellee-defendant Indiana Gas Company (IGC) in the Railroad’s action for trespass, license rent, quantum meruit, and quantum vale-bant.1 Specifically, the Railroad argues that the trial court erred as a matter of law when it held that the de

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KAREN E. SCHREIER, District Judge. Pending are motions for summary judgment by all defendants. Plaintiff, Daniel Reed Christensen, opposes each motion, and separately moves for summary judgment against defendants Humane Society of the United States, Wayne Pacelle, Scottlund Haisley, Dr. Dawn Dale, Dr. Adam Bauknecht, United Animal Nations, Ti

956 P.2d 608 (1998) Crosby L. POWELL, Crosby L. Powell & Associates, Michael Townes, Betty Lou Townes, Donzell Rosenberg, and all other inmates similarly situated in the Colorado Department of Corrections, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COLORADO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION; Robert J. Hix, Vincent Majkowski, R. Brent Alderfer, Commissioners Thereof; Colorado Inmates' Phone System; Colorado Department Of Corrections; And Sprint Communications Compa

618 F.Supp.2d 661 (2009) David K. BROYLES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of TEXAS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-08-02320. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 31, 2009. *666 Robert L. Bernard, Attorney at Law, Fulshear, TX, for Plaintiff. Joe Wilson Cox, Mary Elizabeth Reveles, Randall

WALTERS, Justice pro tem. On November 19, 2004, a jury found Azad Haji Abdullah guilty of first-degree murder, first-degree arson, three counts of attempted first-degree murder, and felony injury to a child. The ease proceeded to sentencing and the jury found the existence of two aggravating circumstances. The jury also found that all the mitigating circumstances when weighed ag

177 F.Supp.2d 303 (2001) Nicholas R. CIPRIANI, Plaintiff, v. LYCOMING COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY; Janice Pepperman, Individually and as Community Counsel of the Lycoming County Housing Authority; and Elizabeth Montgomery, Individually and as Deputy Executive Director of the Lycoming County Housing Authority, Defendants. No. 4:CV-99-980. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

1 F.Supp.2d 635 (1998) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff v. EXXON CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action Nos. 3:95-CV-1311-H, 3:95-CV-2537-H. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. April 10, 1998. *636 *637 Katherine Elizabeth Bissell, Jeffrey Charles Bannon,

77 P.3d 1042 (2003) 2003 OK 72 Paul TIBBETTS, Erwin Olds, Mary Dittemeyer, Mary Pittman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. SIGHT `N SOUND APPLIANCE CENTERS, INC., an Oklahoma Corporation, d/b/a Sight `n Sound & Cost Warehouse, Defendant/Appellant. No. 96,079. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. September 16, 2

ACCEPTED 15-25-00030-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/19/2025 4:35 PM NO. ________________ CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

625 F.2d 967 27 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) 80,470 MESCALERO APACHE TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee,v.Fred L. O'CHESKEY, as Commissioner of Revenue of and for theState of New Mexico and his Successors in Office; the Bureauof Revenue of the State of New Mexico; and the State of NewMexico, Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants. Nos. 77-2102, 77-2103.

FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/19/2025 4:35:10 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk FILED: 2/6/2025 10:26 AM David Trantham Denton County District Clerk

399 F.Supp. 1068 (1975) Hiram L. SCHOONFIELD v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, a Municipal Corporation, et al. Civ. A. No. N-73-896. United States District Court, D. Maryland. August 20, 1975. *1069 *1070 *1071 Patrick A. O'Doherty, Baltimore, Md., fo

255 Minn. 396 (1959) 96 N.W. (2d) 673 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. ALLAN E. GREENMAN. No. 37,620. Supreme Court of Minnesota. May 29, 1959. *397 Lewis L. Anderson, for appellant. Harold L. Rutchick, Irving Shaw, and Louis P. Sheahan, Corporation Cou

338 F.Supp. 67 (1972) Carolyn BRADLEY et al. v. The SCHOOL BOARD OF the CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, et al. Civ. A. No. 3353. United States District Court, E. D. Virginia, Richmond Division. January 5, 1972. Order January 10, 1972. *68 *69 *70

PER CURIAM. Motion for leave to go to Court of Appeals granted, and the following questions of law certified to the Court of Appeals as questions of law which ought to he reviewed by said court-: (1) Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant Charles B. Alexander? (2) Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant Henry M. Ale