Cases

BERZON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Faced with conflicting representations by two law enforcement officers, Hiroe Mukai did the only thing that a reason able parent could have done under the circumstances: She consented to a search for fear that the representation of one of the two officers that her young children would be taken from her if she did not consent would prove correct. The trial court recognized that

BERZON, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Faced with conflicting representations by two law enforcement officers, Hiroe Mukai did the only thing that a reasonable parent could have done under the circumstances: She consented to a search for fear that the representation of one of the two officers that her young children would be taken from her if she did not consent would prove correct. The trial court recognized th

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: I. Introduction... 393 II. Facts... 394 III. Law... 395 A. Legal Standard.. .395 B. Overtime under FLSA and NYLL...395 C. Joint Employment.. .395 1. Vertical Employment.. .396 2. Horizontal Emplo

701 F.Supp.2d 356 (2010) In re BAYER CORP. COMBINATION ASPIRIN PRODUCTS MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. No. 09 Md.2023(BMC)(JMA). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 30, 2010. *361 Andres F. Alonso, David Bruce Krangle, Jerrold S. Parker, Parker & Waichman, Great Neck, NY, Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Becnel Law Fi

Hillman, J. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff brought this action alleging breach of the defendant’s duty to defend and indemnify its insured under a homeowner’s policy. This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 56. Also before the court is the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on Counts I and II of the complaint. For the reasons set forth below

Case: 19-10663 Date Filed: 07/06/2020 Page: 1 of 44 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-10663 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:15-cv-

OPINION OF THE COURT Kaye, J. The pivotal issue in this libel action, brought by a plaintiff who is not a public figure against the author and publisher of a nonfiction book, is whether defendants’ investigation of allegedly defamatory statements was sufficient to shield them from liability, or whether they "acted in a grossly irresponsible manner without due consideration for the standards of information ga

OPINION OF THE COURT Ross, J. We are presented, in this libel action, with the issue of whether unflattering references allegedly referring to the plaintiff, who is a practicing psychologist, which appear in a nonfiction book are defamatory or are constitutionally protected expressions of opinion. Ms. Shana Alexander, in 1985, wrote a book entitled: Nutcracker: Money, Madness, Murder: A

Rup, J. This controversy arises out of a bicycling accident at a camp for diabetic girls, the Clara Barton Camp for Girls with Diabetes2 (“the camp”), in Oxford, Massachusetts, in August 1993. The injured youth, Cherish Eastman (“the plaintiff’), filed this action against the camp’s executive director, Shelley Yeager (“Yeager”), its director, Kathryn Gregorio-Palmer (“Gregorio-Palmer”), the assistant

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi

Charles H. Cohen, J. This application is made pursuant to Workmen’s Compensation Law (§227, subd 1, as amd by L 1975, ch 190, § 2, eff June 10, 1975), upon plaintiff Helen Greenough securing a recovery by settlement in this action to recover damages for personal injuries. The application seeks, in the words of the amendment, "an order apportioning the reasonable and necessary expenditures, including attorneys’ fees, incurred in

Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys

OPINION OF THE COURT Herman H. Tietjen, J. Defendant moves this court for a judgment declaring section 353 of New York’s Agriculture and Markets Law to be unconstitutional. This motion is being made pursuant to CPL 170.35 (subd 1, par [c]). The primary question presented here is: whether section 353 of the Agriculture and Markets Law is unconstitutional on the ground that the statute is too vague for the

120 F.Supp.2d 735 (2000) Suzanne DeWEESE, Plaintiff, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant. No. IP99-1064-C-B/S. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. November 13, 2000. *736 Gregory A. Stowers, Stowers Weddle & Henn, Indianapolis, IN. *737 Susan B.

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1167 TIMOTHY B. BOSTIC; TONY C. LONDON; CAROL SCHALL; MARY TOWNLEY, Plaintiffs − Appellees, JOANNE HARRIS; JESSICA DUFF; CHRISTY BERGHOFF; VICTORIA KIDD, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Intervenors, v. GEORGE E. SCHAEFER, III

MacNeille and Millar, JJ., The first and partial account of the Secretary of Banking, in possession of the South Philadelphia Merchants’ Building and Loan Association, was called for audit on June 17 and 18,1936, in Room E, City Hall. Proof of notice of the filing of the account and of the time and place of audit was duly filed and made part of the record. On June 2,1936, this court entered a decree confirming

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge FLOYD wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge GREGORY joined. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a separate dissenting opinion. FLOYD, Circuit Judge: Via various state statutes and a state constitutional amendment, Virginia prevents same-sex couples from marrying and refuses to recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere. Two same-sex couples filed suit to challenge the cons

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 24-199 Filed: January 23, 2026 PATRICK SNEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Steven M. Wald, with Michael J. Smith, Thomas S. Stewart, and Reed W. Ripley, Stewart, Wald & Smith, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiffs. Emily A. Davis, Environment and Natural Resources Division,

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge, dissenting. This is a close case because it tests the outer limits of ERISA preemption. Although my decision is made more difficult because the New Jersey regulatory scheme (the “Act”) is admirable for its intended purpose and goals, I think Congress intended to preempt these kinds of statutes. The issue is whether a statute of purported general applicability “relates to,” in the ordi