Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-96-00442-CR Shane Edward Drousche, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

NO. 12-23-00047-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: § VOLT POWER, LLC, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING RELATOR § MEMORANDUM OPINION

OSCN Found Document:IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION2026 OK 48Case Number: SCBD-8135Decided: 06/15/2026IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2026 OK 48, __ P.3d __ FOR PUBLICATION IN

NO. 12-23-00047-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: § VOLT POWER, LLC, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING RELATOR § MEMORANDUM OPINION Volt Power, L

*888 OPINION Greg Neeley, Justice Jeremy Oney and Horizon Cable Service, Inc. appeal from a judgment against them and in favor of William “Chip” Crist and Heather Crist. Oney and Horizon present ten issues challenging the trial court’s judgment. We affirm in part and r

ELMORE, Judge. In an apparent effort to avoid a license checkpoint and traffic stop, Jerry Lamont Lindsey (defendant) steered his vehicle down a dead-end road into a ravine. After defendant was apprehended, police found a white substance inside a pill bottle in defendant's pants pocket, and white powder inside twenty-three plastic corner bags in defendant's vehicle. The State's evidence tended to show that the pill bottle and corner

OPINION Opinion by Justice FITZGERALD. This interlocutory appeal arises from the trial court’s order denying Union Pacific Railroad Company’s motions to transfer venue.1 Because we conclude plaintiffs did not meet their burden to establish that Union Pacific maintains a principal office in Dallas County, we reverse the trial court’s order. B

WINDHORST, J. Appellant/claimant, Reginald Billiot, appeals the trial court's September 10, 2018 judgment in favor of appellee/employer, Pala Group, LLC ("Pala"), finding that claimant failed to meet his burden of showing that he sustained a work-related accident or injury and dismissing claimant's case with prejudice. For the following reasons, we affirm. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Claiman

WINDHORST, J. Appellant/claimant, Reginald Billiot, appeals the trial court's September 10, 2018 judgment in favor of appellee/employer, Pala Group, LLC ("Pala"), finding that claimant failed to meet his burden of showing that he sustained a work-related accident or injury and dismissing claimant's case with prejudice. For the following reasons, we affirm. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Claiman

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

46 Cal.4th 364 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ ___ P.3d ___ KAREN L. STRAUSS et al., Petitioners, v. MARK B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. ROBIN TYLER et al., Petitioners, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO e

Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana The Clerk of the Court has notified this Court that certain attorneys have failed either to pay the annual registration fee required for them to be licensed to practice law in Indiana or to file an exemption affidavit as contemplated by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2, and/or have failed to make the IOLTA certification required by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2(f). In additi

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-13-00054-CV THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF R.J.R. On Appeal from the County Court at Law Lamar County, Texas Trial Court No. 123-13 Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss MEMO

694 F.Supp.2d 1192 (2009) In re WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & ERISA LITIGATION. In re Washington Mutual, Inc. Securities Litigation This Document Relates to: All Cases. Case Nos. 2:08-md-1919 MJP, C08-387 MJP. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. October 27, 2009. *1202 James Abram Har

500 F.Supp.2d 618 (2007) Richard John FLORANCE, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Jerry BUCHMEYER, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-125-M. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. July 31, 2007. *619 *620 *621 *6

25 S.W.3d 882 (2000) Allan HAWKINS, Appellant, v. Al WALVOORD; Allen D. Cummings; Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe & Dawson, A.P.C.; Michael T. Morgan; Midland County Bar Association; Midland County Bar Plan; Michael C. Tighe; Victor Torres; Carmen Eiker; John J. Rivas; Harper Estes; Jeff Norwood; James Fitz-Gerald; John Hyde; George D. Gilles; Dean Rucker; Vann Culp; Stubbeman, McRae, Sealy, Laughlin & Browder, Inc.; Mark Dettman; Pat Baskin; Will

21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LINDSAY R. COOPER; JAMES R. No. 19-55295 SUTTON; KIM GIESEKING; CHARLES A. YARRIS; ROBERT M. MILLER; D.C. No. CHRISTOPHER G. BITTNER; ERIC 3:12-cv-03032- MEMBRILA; JUDY GOODWIN; JLS-MSB JENNIFER L. MICKE; JOHN W. SEELBACH; MAURICE D. ENIS; JAIME L. PLYM; NATHAN J. PIEKUTOWSKI; OPINION CAROLYN A. WHITE; LOUIE VIERNES; MICHAEL L. SEBOURN; K.S., an infant by

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si

Sweeney, J. Once again, this court is called upon to reexamine its position with respect to the doctrine of parental immunity in the state of *327Ohio. Until today, the doctrine of parental immunity has stood as an impervious obstacle for almost all children who have attempted to institute legal proceedings against their parents, in order to recover damages for injuries