Cases

Opinion RUBIN, Acting P. J. Christopher Murray appeals from the judgment entered after he was resentenced to life without parole, plus an additional combined consecutive term of 104 years to life after he pleaded no contest to two counts of first degree murder and one count of attempted murder. Murray contends that because he was 17 at the time of the crimes, the sentence violates the state and federal constitu

50 F.Supp.2d 1368 (1999) Sandra L. MURRAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHN D. ARCHBOLD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 6:96CV-67 (WLS). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Thomasville Division. March 31, 1999. *1369 *1370 Kent Spriggs, Tallahassee, FL, Christopher David Ad

FILED STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA June 23, 2021 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

416 F.Supp.2d 740 (2006) John MURRAY and Sharon Murray, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. 03-0206-CV-W-HFS. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division. February 17, 2006. *741 William H. Pickett, William H. Pickett, P.C., Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiffs. Can Franke Walsh, A

12/07/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 17, 2022 Session SHARON TOOMES v. D & S MOTORS ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lauderdale County No. 7196 A. Blake Neill, Judge

790 P.2d 868 (1989) In re the MARRIAGE OF Sharon D. MURRAY a/k/a Sharon D. Smith, Appellee, and Russel Murray III, Appellant. No. 88CA1397. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II. October 26, 1989. Rehearing Denied November 30, 1989. Certiorari Denied April 16, 1990. Margaret Whipple-Warner, Denver, for appellee. Sally S. Townshend,

995 F.Supp. 831 (1998) Eli BLUMENTHAL, Plaintiff, v. George MURRAY, individually and as the former Chief of Police for the Chicago Housing Authority Police Department, Sharon Cruse-Boyd, individually and as Director of Human Resources for the Chicago Housing Authority, and the Chicago Housing Authority, Defendants. No. 97 C 5267. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

946 F.Supp. 623 (1996) Eli BLUMENTHAL, Plaintiff, v. George MURRAY, Sharon Cruse-Boyd, and the Chicago Housing Authority, a Municipal Corporation, Defendants. No. 96 C 2895. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 5, 1996. *624 Martin A. Blumenthal, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Timothy Fair,

212 Ga. App. 648 (1994) 442 S.E.2d 795 MURRAY et al. v. SLOAN PAPER COMPANY. A93A1997. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided March 8, 1994. Reconsideration Denied March 30, 1994. Paul C. Parker & Associates, William S. Sarandis, for appellants. Long, Weinberg, Ansley & Wheeler, Lance D. Lourie, Sharon

702 F.Supp. 524 (1988) Charles E. MURRAY, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Alan K. SILBERSTEIN, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 86-4730. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. December 14, 1988. *525 Isadore A. Shrager, Sharon K. Wallis, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. Howland W. Abramson, Charles W. Johns, Nancy E. Gilberg,

Appellant Donald Murray's wrists broke out in hives shortly after he drew a sample of raw gas as part of his job activities. When the Workers' Compensation Division denied Murray's claim for benefits, a contested case hearing was held to determine whether his injury was work-related. The hearing examiner held that Murray's inability to identify the precise chemical which caused his skin problem constituted failure to prove a compensable injury as a matter of law. We find that Murray's

873 F.Supp. 618 (1994) Kathleen T. EDWARDS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MURRAY CHRIS-CRAFT SPORTBOATS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 92-953-CIV-T-21A. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. March 9, 1994. *619 Nathaniel G.W. Pieper, Lau, Lane, Pieper & Asti, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Kathleen T. Edwards, Joann D. S

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2021 ME 18 Docket: Wal-20-103 Argued: November 17, 2020 Decided: April 1, 2021 Panel: GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. Majority: GORMAN, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. Dissent: JABAR, J. STATE OF MAINE v. SHARON CARRILLO G

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 14, 2022 Decided April 19, 2022 No. 21-5088 MURRAY BRAUN, APPELLANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1

50 F.3d 564 129 Lab.Cas. P 33,214, 2 Wage & Hour Cas.2d(BNA) 1057 Gladys MURRAY, for herself and all others similarlysituated; consent to become parties plaintiff: FloydCaskey; Allan Christiansen; Donald Scott; Deborah L.Hoyt; Russell C. Renecker; Eugene A. Rutledge; LawrenceB. Taylor; Warren Kajander; Jeannette (Petrimoulx)Arbuckle; Kinney Bryant; Carol S. Lewis; Harley Blair;<

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. “Bona fide executive” employees are exempt from the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). See 29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(1). In Murray v. Stuckey’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 614 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073, 112 S.Ct. 970, 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992) (Murray I), we reversed a damage award in favor of former managers of Stuck-ey’s roadside stores. We he

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2187 TRUSTGARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. SHARON COLLINS; DOROTHY L. JACKSON, individually and as Executor of the Estate of Alfred Jackson Sr.; JOHN A. GODFREY; MATTIE E. RENDER, Defendants – Appellants, and MICHAEL BR

11/30/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 13, 2022 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KEITHANDRE TREVON MURRAY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Macon County No. 2017-CR-173 Brody Kane, Judge No.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED MAY SESSION, 1998 December 30, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) Appellate Court Clerk C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9702-CR-00066 ) Appellee, )

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Michael Conrad Murray, FILED Respondent Below, Petitioner June 7, 2013 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS vs) No. 12-07