Cases

11/14/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 29, 2017 Session MIKE BREEN, ET AL. V. JANICE C. SHARP Appeal from the Chancery Court for Stewart County No. CH-14-CV-74 David D. Wolfe, Chancellor No. M2016-02415-COA-R3-CV This

Justice BREYER delivered the opinion of the Court. *1672When Congress enacted the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, ch. 675, 52 Stat. 1040, as amended,

477 S.E.2d 258 (1996) Jane & Dennis SHARP, Petitioners, v. Tamula-Jean SHARP, Respondent. In re Samantha E. FERRELL and Amanda Lynn Sharp. No. COA95-1388. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 5, 1996. *259 Levine & Stewart by Michael D. Levine and Elizabeth R. Harrison, Chapel Hill, for plaintiffs appellants.<

W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: The Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), Pub.L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (2005), authorizes the removal to federal court of “mass actions.” 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(ll)(A), (B). “Mass actions” are civil actions in which “monetary relief claims of 100 or more persons are proposed to be tried jointly on the ground that the plaintiffs’ claims involve common ques

261 P.3d 1080 (2011) Rolland P. WEDDELL; Granite Investment Group, LLC; and High Rock Holding, LLC, Appellants, v. Michael STEWART, an Individual, and as Trustee of the Michael B. Stewart Trust; Empire Energy, LLC; Empire Group, LLC; Empire Foods, LLC; Empire Farms, LLC; Orient Farms, LLC; White Paper, LLC; Empire Geothermal Power, LLC; Nevada Energy Park, LLC; Amor II Corporation; M.B.S., Inc.; Tahoe Rose, LLC; Clearwater River Properties, LLC;

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SIMON CHEFFINS and GREGORY No. 12-16913 JONES, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants- D.C. No. Appellants, 3:09-cv-00130-RAM v. OPINION MICHAEL B. STEWART, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff- Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

OPINION JANE BLAND, Justice. In this real estate dispute, IQ Holdings, Inc. sued its title insurer and its escrow agent to recover damages it sustained in connection with the sale of a condominium unit. During pre-trial discovery, IQ also sought a spoliation-of-evidence finding and sanctions against both defendants. The trial court denied IQ’s motions for s

940 So.2d 724 (2006) Betty SHARP and Sherry Wyatt Brady, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PARKVIEW CARE CENTER, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Betty Sharp and Sherry Wyatt Brady, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Parkview Care and Rehabilitation Center, Inc. and Mark Vance Shelton, M.D., Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 41,341-CA, 41,342-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. September

GEER, Judge. In this appeal, appellant Dawn Sharp asks us to reverse the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss. Defendants have contended that dismissal is appropriate because the complaint establishes contributory negligence as a matter of law. Applying the standards governing a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the *242North Carolina Rule

PER CURIAM. The former husband appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We find merit only in his contention that the trial court erred in awarding permanent alimony to the former wife, and we reverse that award. The record below established that the wife, 34 years of age at the time of dissolution, was in good health, had a nursing degree and was employed as a pharmaceutical

915 P.2d 495 (1996) Marie V. SHARP, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Noel WILLIAMS and Does 1 through 10, Defendants and Appellee. No. 940379. Supreme Court of Utah. April 4, 1996. *496 Third District, Salt Lake County; The Honorable Pat B. Brian. Robert W. Hughes, Salt Lake City, for Sharp. J. Angus Edwards, Salt Lake C

FOX, J. “This is an appeal from the circuit court of Pike county wherein the appellant complains of the action of the trial court in sustaining respondents’ motion to set aside the sale of real estate, made *520under an alias execution, for failure of the sheriff to allow and set aside a homestead to# respondents. “The facts in this case are sub

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Amendment to Fla. Rules of Criminal Procedure Creating Rule 3.853, 807 So.2d 633 (Fla.2001). THOMPSON, C.J., and PALMER, J., concur. SHARP, W., concurs specially, without opinion.

OPINION ROTH, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a November 19, 2002 order by the United States District Court of the Virgin Islands. The Government of the Virgin Islands and the Virgin Islands Tax Assessor (Government) were sued by the Appellees (Commercial Property Owners), who contested the method utilized by the Government to assess their property. The Commercial Property Owners

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Disciplinary Counsel v. Sharp, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3702.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typograp

Lanzinger, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to reverse on authority of Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc., 122 Ohio St.3d 120, 2009-Ohio-2495, 909 N.E.2d 120. We originally held this case for the decision in case No. 2006-0189, Uddin v. Embassy Suites Hotel.1 When <

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge TRAXLER joined. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: Based on its efforts to purchase 1,400 calculators from Sharp Electronics Corporation, Audio Visual Associates, Inc., filed this action against Sharp for breach of contract, tortious b

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice: Plaintiff Drew A. Sharp commenced this action against defendant Maurice K. Rosk-elley to recover damages for the defendant’s alleged alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s wife, Abbie Sharp, and for criminal conversation with her. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant on both claims, and plaintiff appeals. Plaintiff and Abbie were married in 1977 a

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00061-CV ___________________________ CITY OF GAINESVILLE, Appellant V. SUZANNE SHARP, Appellee On Appeal from the 235th District Court Cooke County, Texas Trial Court No. CV20-00300 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Birdwell and Wallach, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Birdwell

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice. The appellee, Sharp County, Arkansas, brought this cause of action in replevin to obtain title to items of jewelry which the appellant, former County Judge Leslie Anderson, received as a bribe. The case was presented to the Sharp County Circuit Court on the following agreed statement of facts: Stewart Lambert, Deputy Prosecuting Attorne