Cases

TANGEMAN, J. *24The California Constitution mandates the payment of victim restitution "in every case" resulting in economic loss, "regardless of the sentence or disposition imposed." ( Cal. Const., art. I, § 28, *25subd. (b)(13)(B).) Courts are often called upo

*965MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 4]; and (2) Plaintiffs Motion to Remand to State Court [Doc. No. 26], For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiffs Mo

805 F.Supp.2d 655 (2011) Sheila HELMERT, Wilma Brown, and Lori West, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. BUTTERBALL, LLC, Defendant. Roxie Garner, Roy Garner, Jason Foster, Miguel Anguiano Araujo, Christopher Smith, John Snarr, and James Rollins, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Butterball, LLC, and Gary R. Lenaghan, Defendants. Nos. 4:08CV00342

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-3264 ___________________________ Branden Kittle-Aikeley; Michael Barrett, IV; Jacob Curliss; John Doe lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellees v. Dr. Shawn Strong, in his official capacity as Presiden

978 F.Supp. 839 (1997) Albert L. WOKAS, Plaintiff, v. DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC., d/b/a Wayne Dresser, Defendant. No. 1:96-CV-0297. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Wayne Division. September 12, 1997. *840 David R. Melton, Barnes and Thornburg, South Bend, IN, D. Randall Brown, Bobby B. Gillenwater, Richard E. Steinbronn

Justice BREYER delivered the opinion of the Court. In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 ,

Justice LEHRMANN, joined by Justice BOYD and Justice DEVINE, dissenting. Throughout history, science has informed our society in important ways. Educated people once believed that the sun orbited the earth, until Nicolaus Copernicus used geometry and astronomy to *367prove a heliocentric model of the solar system. Doctors once accepted that illness was ca

(2008) Peter A. PEDROLI, derivatively on Behalf of MICROTUNE, INC., Plaintiff, v. Douglas J. BARTEK, et al., Defendants, and Microtune, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Nominal Defendant. No. 4:07-CV-43. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division. March 31, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD A. SCHELL, District Judge.

Cite as 2025 Ark. 59 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: May 1, 2025 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2025 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2025 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2025. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, the clerk of t

ORDER GRANTING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS’ EXPEDITED MOTION TO SUSPEND REQUIREMENT FOR RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE RICHARD A. SCHELL, District Judge. Before the court is “Certain Defendants’ Expedited Motion to Suspend Requirement for Rule 26(f) Conference” (de # 64), “Plaintiffs Opposition to Certain Defendants’ Expedited Motion to Suspend Requirement for Rule 26(f) Conference” (de # 70), and “Certain Defen

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge. Plaintiff The National Organization for Marriage, Inc. (“NOM”) has filed this action alleging that the United States of America, through agents of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), violated 26 U.S.C. § 6103 by improperly disclosing its confidential tax return information. (Compl. [Dkt. 1] at 1-2.) Currently before the Court is the Government’s

Filed 8/22/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B289580 (Super. Ct. No. 15F-01361) Plaintiff and Respondent, (San Luis Obispo County) v. DREW BARRETT GRUNDFOR, Defendant and Appellant. The California Constit

Case: 21-2255 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 11/30/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DONALD MARTIN, JR., PATRICIA A. MANBECK, JEFF ROBERTS, JOSE ROJAS, RANDALL SUMNER, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant ______________________

04/01/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 23, 2022 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KENNETH COX Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 111617 Steven Wayne Sword, Judge ___________________________________

336 F.Supp.2d 87 (2004) Emily MCINTYRE and Christopher McIntyre as co-administrators of the Estate of John L. McIntyre, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.01-CV-10408-RC. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 30, 2004. *88 *89

07/22/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 10, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RICHARD CALDWELL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-85154 Howard W. Wilson, Chancellor ________________________________

307 Ga. 537 FINAL COPY S19A1344. CLARK v. THE STATE. PETERSON, Justice. Shawn Clark appeals his malice murder conviction for killing Antonio Ellison.1 Clark did not dispute at trial that he intentionally shot Ellison, but claimed that his actions were justified because he was defending himself and his vehicle. On appeal, Clark argues that the State failed to disprove defense of habitation beyond a reasonable doubt. Clark also argues that his trial counsel

OPINION & ORDER JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: Officers Erin O’Donnell, Wilfredo Diaz, Christopher Ereg, Michael -Farley, Cynthia Moore, Michael Rinkus, William Salu-po, Brian Sabolik, and Scott Sistek (“Plaintiffs”) work as police officers with the Cleveland. Police Department. In this case, the Plaintiff Officers sue the City of Cleveland,' Michael McGrath, Martin Flask, Calvin William

[Cite as State v. Yacobucci, 2019-Ohio-36.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney Plaintiff-Appellee :

Cite as 2020 Ark. 418 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-19-926 Opinion Delivered: December 17, 2020 MARVIN ARRELL STANTON APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE MILLER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 46CR-15-503] STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE KIRK JOHNSON,