⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Sheehan v. Verizon Communications, Inc.”

District Court, E.D. New York · 2007-07-25 · Published · cited 12× · 498 F. Supp. 2d 586; 12 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1377; 182 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2407; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53907; 2007 WL 2122050
498 F.Supp.2d 586 (2007) Sabrina LEVY, Joseph Bailey, Bonnie Phillips, Valerie MacHemer, John Kuper, and Charles Rossi, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. VERIZON INFORMATION SERVICES INC., a Division of Verizon Communications Inc., Verizon Directories, Corp., Verizon Accounting and Information Services, Inc., and Verizon New York Directory Sales Company, Defendants. Joseph Pasquali, Eve Wegener, Edwar
District Court, D. Maryland · 2006-02-06 · Published · cited 3× · 413 F. Supp. 2d 553; 179 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2029; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4421; 2006 WL 273582
413 F.Supp.2d 553 (2006) CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL UNION, et al. No. CIV.A. DKC 2005-0419. United States District Court, D. Maryland. February 6, 2006. *554 *555 David Philip Callet, Nilufer Loy, Ronald Maurice Johnson, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer and
District Court, D. Maryland · 2004-07-19 · Published · cited 0× · 327 F. Supp. 2d 554; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13954
MEMORANDUM BLAKE, District Judge. On June 21, 2002, a consolidated and renewed motion for remand filed in the Pinney, Farina, Gilliam, Gimpelson, and Naquin actions in this multidistrict litigation was denied.1 I held that federal question jurisdiction supported removal based on the substantial federal question doctrine. In re Wireless Tel. Radio
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009-02-12 · Published · cited 0× · 447 B.R. 475
MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026-01-08 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALIVECOR, INC., No. 24-1392 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 4:21-cv-03958- JSW v. APPLE INC., OPINION Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022-10-20 · Published · cited 3× · 286 A.3d 248; 2022 Pa. Super. 184
J-A24002-21 2022 PA Super 184 DAVID RITCHEY AND HOLLY : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RITCHEY : PENNSYLVANIA : V. : : RUTTER'S INC., RUTTER'S HOLDING, : INC, AND CHR CORPORATION AND : GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY,
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022-10-20 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 Pa. Super. 184
J-A24002-21 2022 PA Super 184 DAVID RITCHEY AND HOLLY : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RITCHEY : PENNSYLVANIA : V. : : RUTTER'S INC., RUTTER'S HOLDING, : INC, AND CHR CORPORATION AND : GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY,
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011-02-16 · Published · cited 4× · 772 F. Supp. 2d 923; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15693; 2011 WL 679908
772 F.Supp.2d 923 (2011) Eric SILVERMAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. MOTOROLA, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 07 C 04507. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 16, 2011. *924 David A. Rosenfeld, Joseph Russello, Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins
District Court, E.D. New York · 2012-07-26 · Published · cited 71× · 284 F.R.D. 50; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104585; 2012 WL 3062017
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROANNE L. MANN, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Gerardo Valdez Lujan (“Lujan”) and several “opt-in” plaintiffs (collectively, “plaintiffs”) bring this lawsuit against defendants Cabana Management, Inc. (“Cabana”) and Glenn Frechter (collectively, “defendants”) to recover minimum wage and overtime payments allegedly due to Lujan and other current and former employe
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-04-22 · Published · cited 21× · 296 F.R.D. 136; 2013 WL 1728059; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57644
*138MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX, United States Magistrate Judge. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is defendant Maryanne Fike’s (“Fike”) application, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, for an award of the reasonable attorneys’ fees she incurred in making her motion to compel plaintiff Bravia Capital Partners, I
District Court, D. Maryland · 2014-11-03 · Published · cited 0× · 65 F. Supp. 3d 440; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155417
MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge. Plaintiff Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. (“Sinai”) has filed this action against Defendant 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East (“the Union”) under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, seeking vacatur of an arbitration award in favor of the Union. Currently pending before this Court is the Union’s Motio
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009-02-12 · Published · cited 2× · 447 B.R. 475; 61 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1312; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 672; 51 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 73
447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009-03-09 · Published · cited 10× · 606 F. Supp. 2d 546; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19451; 2009 WL 605751
606 F.Supp.2d 546 (2009) Cheryl SCHWARZWAELDER, Plaintiff, v. MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. and Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Defendants. Civil Action No. 04-1879. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 9, 2009. *548 Joseph H. Chivers, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff. John David Collins, William B. Wahlhei
District Court, C.D. California · 2009-01-21 · Published · cited 3× · 400 B.R. 755; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10384; 2009 WL 151218
400 B.R. 755 (2009) In re Victor M. ORTIZ, Debtor. Top Rank, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Appellant, v. Victor M. Ortiz, an individual, Appellee. No. CV 08-06116 MMM. Bankruptcy No. BK 08-10004 RR. Adversary No. AP 08-01037 RR. United States District Court, C.D. California. January 21, 2009. *759 Aram Ordubegian, Andy S. Kong,
Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018-10-05 · Published · cited 34× · 201 A.3d 326; 2018 VT 101
ROBINSON, J. ¶ 1. This case comes to us after a lengthy bench trial between appellants/cross-appellees Kneebinding, Inc. (Kneebinding) and Kneebinding company directors John and Tina Springer-Miller (the Springer-Millers), and appellee/cross-appellant Richard Howell (Howell) that resulted in a series of interlocutory decisions before final judgment. Kneebinding and the Springer-Millers
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2023-10-24 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 WY 100
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 100 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2023 October 24, 2023 BARBARA CAMPBELL and WILLIAM LOVELAND, on behalf of themselves and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. CHRIS DAVIDSON; TRI COUNTY TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, INC., a Wyoming corporation; DALIN
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2023-10-24 · Published · cited 3× · 537 P.3d 734; 2023 WY 100
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 100 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2023 October 24, 2023 BARBARA CAMPBELL and WILLIAM LOVELAND, on behalf of themselves and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. CHRIS DAVIDSON; TRI COUNTY TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, INC., a Wyoming corporation; DALIN
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013-10-15 · Published · cited 25× · 732 F.3d 117; 43 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20229; 2013 WL 5614000; 77 ERC (BNA) 1245; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 20781
*121 CHIN, Circuit Judge: In this case, the State of New York (the “State”) sued defendants-appellees under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. (“CERCLA”), to recover certain costs incurred in investigating and add
Alaska Supreme Court · 2011-11-04 · Published · cited 29× · 267 P.3d 1151; 2011 Alas. LEXIS 118; 2011 WL 5288786
OPINION PER CURIAM. I. INTRODUCTION When the legislature enacted the Alaska Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act (UTPA)1 in 1970, it declared unlawful "unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of trade or commerce." 2 Through a 1974 amendment to the UTPA, the legislature directed Alaska courts to give "due co
Doe v. Shibinettepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021-10-26 · Published · cited 27× · 16 F.4th 894
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1058 JOHN DOE; CHARLES COE; JANE ROE; DEBORAH A. TAYLOR, as guardian for SCOTT STEPHEN JOHNSTONE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Appellees, NEW HAMPSHIRE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION; ALICE PECK DAY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; ANDROSCOGGIN VALLEY HOSPITAL; CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER; CHESHIRE MEDICAL CENTER; COTTAGE HOSPITAL; ELLIOT H