Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sheehan v. Verizon Communications, Inc.”
Levy v. Verizon Information Services Inc.public domain
498 F.Supp.2d 586 (2007) Sabrina LEVY, Joseph Bailey, Bonnie Phillips, Valerie MacHemer, John Kuper, and Charles Rossi, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. VERIZON INFORMATION SERVICES INC., a Division of Verizon Communications Inc., Verizon Directories, Corp., Verizon Accounting and Information Services, Inc., and Verizon New York Directory Sales Company, Defendants. Joseph Pasquali, Eve Wegener, Edwar
413 F.Supp.2d 553 (2006) CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL UNION, et al. No. CIV.A. DKC 2005-0419. United States District Court, D. Maryland. February 6, 2006. *554 *555 David Philip Callet, Nilufer Loy, Ronald Maurice Johnson, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer and
Murray v. Motorola, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM BLAKE, District Judge. On June 21, 2002, a consolidated and renewed motion for remand filed in the Pinney, Farina, Gilliam, Gimpelson, and Naquin actions in this multidistrict litigation was denied.1 I held that federal question jurisdiction supported removal based on the substantial federal question doctrine. In re Wireless Tel. Radio
In re Circuit City Stores, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed
Alivecor, Inc. v. Apple Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALIVECOR, INC., No. 24-1392 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 4:21-cv-03958- JSW v. APPLE INC., OPINION Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for
Rutter's, Inc. v. Ritchey, D.public domain
J-A24002-21 2022 PA Super 184 DAVID RITCHEY AND HOLLY : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RITCHEY : PENNSYLVANIA : V. : : RUTTER'S INC., RUTTER'S HOLDING, : INC, AND CHR CORPORATION AND : GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY,
Rutter's, Inc. v. Ritchey, D.public domain
J-A24002-21 2022 PA Super 184 DAVID RITCHEY AND HOLLY : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RITCHEY : PENNSYLVANIA : V. : : RUTTER'S INC., RUTTER'S HOLDING, : INC, AND CHR CORPORATION AND : GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY,
Silverman v. Motorola, Inc.public domain
772 F.Supp.2d 923 (2011) Eric SILVERMAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. MOTOROLA, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 07 C 04507. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 16, 2011. *924 David A. Rosenfeld, Joseph Russello, Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins
Lujan v. Cabana Management, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROANNE L. MANN, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Gerardo Valdez Lujan (“Lujan”) and several “opt-in” plaintiffs (collectively, “plaintiffs”) bring this lawsuit against defendants Cabana Management, Inc. (“Cabana”) and Glenn Frechter (collectively, “defendants”) to recover minimum wage and overtime payments allegedly due to Lujan and other current and former employe
Bravia Capital Partners, Inc. v. Fikepublic domain
*138MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX, United States Magistrate Judge. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is defendant Maryanne Fike’s (“Fike”) application, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, for an award of the reasonable attorneys’ fees she incurred in making her motion to compel plaintiff Bravia Capital Partners, I
MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge. Plaintiff Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. (“Sinai”) has filed this action against Defendant 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East (“the Union”) under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, seeking vacatur of an arbitration award in favor of the Union. Currently pending before this Court is the Union’s Motio
In Re Circuit City Stores, Inc.public domain
447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter
Schwarzwaelder v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.public domain
606 F.Supp.2d 546 (2009) Cheryl SCHWARZWAELDER, Plaintiff, v. MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. and Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Defendants. Civil Action No. 04-1879. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 9, 2009. *548 Joseph H. Chivers, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff. John David Collins, William B. Wahlhei
Top Rank, Inc. v. Ortiz (In Re Ortiz)public domain
400 B.R. 755 (2009) In re Victor M. ORTIZ, Debtor. Top Rank, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Appellant, v. Victor M. Ortiz, an individual, Appellee. No. CV 08-06116 MMM. Bankruptcy No. BK 08-10004 RR. Adversary No. AP 08-01037 RR. United States District Court, C.D. California. January 21, 2009. *759 Aram Ordubegian, Andy S. Kong,
Kneebinding, Inc., John Springer-Miller, Tina Springer-Miller and ACL Investments, LLC v. Richard Howellpublic domain
ROBINSON, J. ¶ 1. This case comes to us after a lengthy bench trial between appellants/cross-appellees Kneebinding, Inc. (Kneebinding) and Kneebinding company directors John and Tina Springer-Miller (the Springer-Millers), and appellee/cross-appellant Richard Howell (Howell) that resulted in a series of interlocutory decisions before final judgment. Kneebinding and the Springer-Millers
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 100 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2023 October 24, 2023 BARBARA CAMPBELL and WILLIAM LOVELAND, on behalf of themselves and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. CHRIS DAVIDSON; TRI COUNTY TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, INC., a Wyoming corporation; DALIN
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 100 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2023 October 24, 2023 BARBARA CAMPBELL and WILLIAM LOVELAND, on behalf of themselves and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. CHRIS DAVIDSON; TRI COUNTY TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, INC., a Wyoming corporation; DALIN
State of New York v. Next Millenium Realtypublic domain
*121 CHIN, Circuit Judge: In this case, the State of New York (the “State”) sued defendants-appellees under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. (“CERCLA”), to recover certain costs incurred in investigating and add
OPINION PER CURIAM. I. INTRODUCTION When the legislature enacted the Alaska Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act (UTPA)1 in 1970, it declared unlawful "unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of trade or commerce." 2 Through a 1974 amendment to the UTPA, the legislature directed Alaska courts to give "due co
Doe v. Shibinettepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1058 JOHN DOE; CHARLES COE; JANE ROE; DEBORAH A. TAYLOR, as guardian for SCOTT STEPHEN JOHNSTONE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Appellees, NEW HAMPSHIRE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION; ALICE PECK DAY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; ANDROSCOGGIN VALLEY HOSPITAL; CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER; CHESHIRE MEDICAL CENTER; COTTAGE HOSPITAL; ELLIOT H