⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

15 opinions for “Shehan v. Barrone”

Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016-12-09 · Published · cited 0× · 2016 VT 123; 203 Vt. 616; 160 A.3d 1030; 2016 WL 7177846; 2016 Vt. LEXIS 128
Robinson, J. ¶ 1. Petitioner appeals the superior court’s summary judgment decision upholding his prison disciplinary convic *617 tion for threatening another person. He argues that the Department of Corrections (DOC): (1) failed to prove that he had the ability and opportunity to carry out his threat a
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019-04-19 · Published · cited 33× · 922 F.3d 1
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. After the district court denied his motions to suppress evidence, David Morel, Jr., entered a conditional plea to one count of possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252 (a)(4)(B). He was sentenced to seventy months'
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998-04-07 · Published · cited 9× · 497 S.E.2d 715; 129 N.C. App. 174; 1998 N.C. App. LEXIS 425
497 S.E.2d 715 (1998) Dale E. TAYLOR, B.J. Fore, Dillard A. Brown, Harvey R. Cook, Jr., Thomas P. Deighton, James M. Floyd, Cathy Ann Hall, Grant Harrold, Mary Rose Hart, Raymond Higgins, Kenneth D. Hinson, Allen C. Jones, James T. Malcolm, III, Randy W. Martin, Richard N. Oulette, Ralph Pittman, Sid A. Pope, Daniel L. *716 Powers, II, Daryl D. Pruitt, Lisa D. Robertson, Ricky E. Shehan, Gregory F. Snider, Timothy C.
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949-02-04 · Published · cited 2× · 54 S.E.2d 61; 215 S.C. 66; 1949 S.C. LEXIS 67
February 4, 1949. On November 7, 1944 respondent while employed by the Pendleton Manufacturing Company suffered injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment for which on May 14, 1946, the South Carolina Industrial Commission made an award which was paid in full. Within the statutory period respondent made application for further compensation on the grounds of a change of condition. Pursuant to a hearing on such application an award was made granting claimant compensation as bei
Quenstedt v. Wilsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1937-09-16 · Published · cited 55× · 194 A. 354; 173 Md. 11; 1937 Md. LEXIS 280
On May 11th, 1937, Florence Wilson, on behalf of Thomas E. Wilson, filed in the Baltimore City Court a petition for the writ of habeas corpus, to obtain his release from the custody of the warden of the Maryland House of Correction (Walter E. Quenstedt), by whom he was alleged to be illegally detained and imprisoned. The petitioner also filed at the same time a petition wherein she stated that the reasons for asking for the writ, which would be assigned at the hearing, were: "(A) Tha
Hubbard v. Hubbardpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1937-06-17 · Published · cited 6× · 192 A. 592; 172 Md. 645; 1937 Md. LEXIS 272
A testamentary trustee for the benefit of a life tenant and remaindermen, holding an investment in notes secured by a pledge of mortgage bonds of the same debtor, applied to the court of equity for instructions on the distribution of money received as interest on the bonds after default on the notes at maturity, without sale or foreclosure of the collateral; and the life tenant appeals from a direction denying her a right to priority for payment of the interest installments on the notes after
North Dakota Supreme Court · 1930-01-06 · Published · cited 2× · 228 N.W. 456; 59 N.D. 59; 1930 N.D. LEXIS 124
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries, which, she alleges, were sustained through the negligence of the defendant. In its answer the defendant admits that the plaintiff was a passenger on one of its passenger trains on the day the plaintiff claims to have been injured; but denies that the plaintiff was injured at all or that the defendant was in any manner negligent; and it alleges that if the plaintiff sustained any injuries that they were occasioned solely b
Rowe v. Cullenpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939-11-29 · Published · cited 9× · 9 A.2d 585; 177 Md. 357; 1939 Md. LEXIS 260
The first question presented by this appeal is whether an illegitimate child is a "descendant" of his mother within the meaning of Code, art. 93, sec. 311, which provides that, if the surviving spouse of a testator elects to renounce any provision for his benefit made by the will, he shall take one-third of the estate, if the testator leave "descendants" surviving, one-half if the deceased spouse is not survived by "descendants." Rosalie E. Rowe, a resident of Baltimore County, died on
Blanch v. Collisonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1938-05-18 · Published · cited 12× · 199 A. 466; 174 Md. 427; 1938 Md. LEXIS 283
The appeal here is from a decree of the chancellor which sustained the demurrer to an amended bill of complaint, and dismissed the suit, with costs to the defendants. A certain Richard W. Ward owned some years ago a parcel of land of sixty square perches in Anne Arundel County, and became indebted to Nicholas G. Collison in the sum of $100. To secure the indebtedness, Ward executed a mortgage whereby he conveyed the land to Collison by deed dated May 22d 1899, and duly recorded. Later,
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1938-05-20 · Published · cited 97× · 199 A. 628; 174 Md. 314; 1938 Md. LEXIS 274
The infant appellee, a pupil at a Roman Catholic parochial school in Baltimore County, the Immaculate School, has been granted the writ of mandamus to compel the Board of Education of the county to carry him to and fro between his home and the school, in accordance with a public local law of the county (Acts of 1937, chapter 185), ordering transportation of such a child in a bus provided for public school children. The board has appealed, and on its appeal questions the validity of the provis
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1938-10-26 · Published · cited 5× · 1 A.2d 903; 175 Md. 368; 1938 Md. LEXIS 214
Claiming disability indemnity by reason of the loss of the entire use of one hand and one foot within the meaning and terms of a disability policy issued by Commercial Casualty Insurance Company, James Zajic brought suit and recovered judgment for four hundred and fifty dollars in the Superior Court of Baltimore City, and from this judgment an appeal is prosecuted by the insurer. *Page 371 During the trial five exceptions were taken by appellant to
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936-11-19 · Published · cited 26× · 188 A. 15; 171 Md. 115; 1936 Md. LEXIS 36
Della Reed, appellant herein, brought suit in the Baltimore *Page 117 City Court against the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Gregorios Diacamacos, Basil Dezes, and Paraskevy Dezes, tenants, and Nicholas Karangelen and Peter Kavakos, subtenants, of the first-named defendant, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her while upon one of the walks or passageways of Cross Street Market in Baltimore City. The declaration alleges that
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999-05-06 · Published · cited 99× · 258 A.D.2d 127; 689 N.Y.S.2d 100
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration statement, which is mailed every two years by the Office of Co
Indiana Supreme Court · 1904-03-31 · Published · cited 2× · 162 Ind. 382; 66 L.R.A. 89; 70 N.E. 489; 1904 Ind. LEXIS 61
Monks, J. Appellee sued appellant on February 12, 1902, in the Vigo Circuit Court upon a bank check dated January 25, 1902, ’for $10,000 drawn by appellant upon the Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee, payable to appellee. Appellant on February 25, 1902, filed an inter-pleader and sought therein to have other alleged claimants substituted as defendants in its place, and to be discharged from liability to either party on its de
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1874-03-15 · Published · cited 1× · 56 Mo. 202
Napton, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court. This suit is to recover dower in a leasehold of 14.99-100 acres. Charles Huth, the husband of plaintiff, died in 1850, having in possession and claiming title to a leasehold for 99 years from the inhabitants of Carondelet, granted to one Chavtrand in 1843, and held by said Huth, through convey*20