⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Sheila Staggs Brown”

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 14, 2012 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SCOTTY DALE STAGGS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Overton County No. 2010-CR-179 Leon C. Burns, Jr., Judge No. M2011-01675-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 12, 2013 The Defendant-Appellant, Scotty Dale Staggs, was indicted by an Overton County Grand Jury fo
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2025-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRYAN REILLY, individually on ) behalf of himself and all others similarly ) situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0654-LWW ) KEITH L. HORN, ZACHARY )
District Court, N.D. New York · 2016-02-04 · Published · cited 17× · 160 F. Supp. 3d 460; 2016 WL 447713
DECISION AND ORDER CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION This is an action against the United States of America under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1) (“FTCA”), seeking damages, for personal injuries and wrongful death, caused by a federal pre-trial releasee, David Renz (“Renz”), who, after being charged with receiving and possessing child po
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 787 So. 2d 699; 2000 Ala. LEXIS 244
I concur with the affirmance of the summary judgment for the defendant Colbert County. However, because I believe the plaintiff Willa D. Jones presented substantial evidence of wantonness on the part of the defendant Norfolk Southern Railway (hereinafter, the "Railway" or "Norfolk Southern"), I must respectfully dissent from the affirmance of the summary judgment for the Railway. The evidence in the record, viewed in a light most favorable to the plaintiff Jones, suggests these
Price v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989-10-30 · Published · cited 15× · 782 P.2d 143; 1989 OK CR 74; 1989 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 77; 1989 WL 128611
782 P.2d 143 (1989) Billy Dewayne PRICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. F-86-319. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. October 30, 1989. Patti Palmer, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Norman, for appellant. Robert H. Henry, Atty. Gen., Sandra D. Howard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998-11-09 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit Byron White United States Courthouse 1823 Stout Street Denver, Colorado 80294 (303) 844-3157 Patrick J. Fisher, Jr. Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998-11-09 · Published · cited 145× · 160 F.3d 613; 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 6258; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 28228; 1998 WL 778298
EBEL, Circuit Judge. Individuals injured by the April 19, 1995, bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building (“Murrah Building”) in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, filed suit against the manufacturers of the ammonium nitrate allegedly used to create the bomb. The plaintiffs’ complaint set forth theories of negligence, negligence per se, negligent entrustment, ne
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 12× · 899 F.3d 567
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Employees of Conagra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC, (ConAgra) appeal the dismissal of their claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. , and the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act, Ark. Code § 11-4-201, et seq. , arguing that factual disputes preclude summary j